pepin1234 Posted December 9, 2023 Posted December 9, 2023 (edited) As the secret Su-17 project use the Kh-29T and Kh-25. It's possible those improvements have to do with the only possible full fidelity project that use those weapons. Those weapons have been there for years without any attention from ED, as Su-17 is quite long teased in the OctopusG Facebook with a very good quality cockpit panel show, it is probably the Su-17 project need some extra attention to the main guided A/G missiles. Facebook Edited December 9, 2023 by pepin1234 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Avimimus Posted December 9, 2023 Posted December 9, 2023 It is available on the Su-25T, and there had been issues with a number of the behaviours of Russian missiles for the Su-25 and Su-25T. I don't think it needs explanation beyond that. 1
Silver_Dragon Posted December 10, 2023 Posted December 10, 2023 19 hours ago, pepin1234 said: As the secret Su-17 project use the Kh-29T and Kh-25. It's possible those improvements have to do with the only possible full fidelity project that use those weapons. Those weapons have been there for years without any attention from ED, as Su-17 is quite long teased in the OctopusG Facebook with a very good quality cockpit panel show, it is probably the Su-17 project need some extra attention to the main guided A/G missiles. These comments have no validity, and to believe that ED has begun to improve the physics of air-to-ground missiles by one mod is nonsense. ED already had plans for a long time about improving missile physics, so don't make up value judgments. Remember, all modules require ED approval and an official statement. For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
pepin1234 Posted December 10, 2023 Author Posted December 10, 2023 6 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said: These comments have no validity, and to believe that ED has begun to improve the physics of air-to-ground missiles by one mod is nonsense. ED already had plans for a long time about improving missile physics, so don't make up value judgments. Remember, all modules require ED approval and an official statement. respect the freedom of opinion... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted December 10, 2023 ED Team Posted December 10, 2023 Your opinion is wrong, they are not related to the Su-17 mod 1 Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
pepin1234 Posted December 10, 2023 Author Posted December 10, 2023 4 minutes ago, BIGNEWY said: Your opinion is wrong, they are not related to the Su-17 mod we actually have a Su-17 mod? I made my opinion based in a teased Su-17 panel on the OctopusG Facebook. No mod related. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted December 10, 2023 ED Team Posted December 10, 2023 2 hours ago, pepin1234 said: we actually have a Su-17 mod? I made my opinion based in a teased Su-17 panel on the OctopusG Facebook. No mod related. You asked " Kh-29T improvement have something to do with the OctopusG Su-17? " and gave your opinion in the posts above, I replied to let you know your assumption was wrong. The work on the Kh-29t is not related. thank you Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Recommended Posts