Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm playing with bombs.  What could possibly go wrong?

Reasonably soft targets; couple Toyotas, Mi-8s, Ka-50s, Su-25s, lots of mannequins standing around.

8 CBUs, a handful of mannequins fall over.  That's 24 shy of 2,000 little high explosive anti-tank bomblets; based on what I see some of those were pretty much centered on non-tanks.

Are CBUs on the F-18 the punch line of a joke, am I employing them wrong, or am I missing something?  Sure, if I actually want to blow something up with cluster bombs I use an F-16, but why should the Air Force have all the fun?

2024.005.02 8xMk20.trk 2024.005.02 8xCBU99.trk

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
12 hours ago, icecold951 said:

Um, those aren't anti-tank CBUs.

Yes they are.

Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

@Raisuli Mk20 and CBUs contain Mk 188 Rockeye bomblets - which is specifically designed as armor-piercing, anti-tank weapon. It is HEAT-only design with shaped charge to penetrate ~200mm of armor - which only works on direct hit. Mk188 hits near the target do mostly nothing as it does not have fragmentation case.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...