horrible quality, not woth my money

[BackboneOne]

absolute disaster of a campaign: broken triggers, poor voice acting and filter, AI voices, very basic scenarios. after fantastic outpost campaign this is absolutely below any standards for its price

[Tom P]

On 10/7/2025 at 12:02 PM, BackboneOne said:

absolute disaster of a campaign: broken triggers, poor voice acting and filter, AI voices, very basic scenarios. after fantastic outpost campaign this is absolutely below any standards for its price

Ok so what feedback do you have so the campaign maker can use it for the future instead of basically saying "This sucks." 

[BackboneOne]

20 hours ago, Tom P said:

Ok so what feedback do you have so the campaign maker can use it for the future instead of basically saying "This sucks." 

I have paid money and get low quality product, i can give any feedback i want. Who do you think you are talking to me like that?

[Reflected]

On 10/8/2025 at 1:02 AM, BackboneOne said:

absolute disaster of a campaign: broken triggers, poor voice acting and filter, AI voices, very basic scenarios. after fantastic outpost campaign this is absolutely below any standards for its price

The Outpost campaign was made by someone else, so I'm sure it wasn't a 'deliberate lowering of standards' nor 'negligence'. Every campaign maker is different, with different ideas, experience, etc...we often don't even play each others' campaigns, because we don't know how to fly that module. ( e.g. have no clue about the Apache)  So, some details would be nice to hear what Fight's On Simulations should work on to improve this and any upcoming campaigns.

You mentioned AI voices, that's a good start. I agree, real people will always sound better.

What didn't you like about the voice filter?  Too distorted? too quiet? How could the scenarios be less 'basic'? Should they be more difficult? Or more planes and actors being around for more immersion? 

Such feedback helps us improve, I know it helped - and still helps me over the course of the past 6 years.

[BackboneOne]

7 hours ago, Reflected said:

The Outpost campaign was made by someone else, so I'm sure it wasn't a 'deliberate lowering of standards' nor 'negligence'. Every campaign maker is different, with different ideas, experience, etc...we often don't even play each others' campaigns, because we don't know how to fly that module. ( e.g. have no clue about the Apache)  So, some details would be nice to hear what Fight's On Simulations should work on to improve this and any upcoming campaigns.

You mentioned AI voices, that's a good start. I agree, real people will always sound better.

What didn't you like about the voice filter?  Too distorted? too quiet? How could the scenarios be less 'basic'? Should they be more difficult? Or more planes and actors being around for more immersion? 

Such feedback helps us improve, I know it helped - and still helps me over the course of the past 6 years.

I have also mentioned broken triggers, wingman that do not follow you and landing in a middle of nowhere and so on. Voice acting and writing is poor, high frequencies of filters makes my ears bleed. Not to mention AI voices - that is just below standards. Briefing documents has poor design and content. And most of all this garbage is the most expensive campaign for ah64. Too bad that that creators dont look into another products on the market, thats profanity. Too bad that ed sell stuff like that for that price.

[JohnW71]

3 hours ago, BackboneOne said:

 And most of all this garbage is the most expensive campaign for ah64

The Outpost campaign is the most expensive AH64 campaign, its just not included in the current sale.

[BackboneOne]

2 minutes ago, JohnW71 said:

The Outpost campaign is the most expensive AH64 campaign, its just not included in the current sale.

Oupost is the best campaign for AH64. Also funny that Griffin campaign is free and its kinda better than Four Horsemen))

[Florence201]

As the campaign designer, i appreciate feedback. However, that does not give you the right to be rude to people who are asking you to be constructive.

I think it's strange that you are starting out blaming me for things outside of my control.

1. Broken Triggers - As ED make game changes, it can break things designers have built. We rely on player inputs to fix bugs

2. Voice Audio and Content - Again, when i built the campaign, there were no radio effects in game. Since the campaign was released, it is ED who have made changes to radio effects, that seem to be the reason you now feel it "Makes your ears bleed".

 

Those are just 2 examples of things I cannot control.

 

As for the actual scripts. Having flown aircraft in the UK RAF for over 25 years, I have some experience with radio calls and banter within a crew/team. So, I find your comments to be incorrect and a little out of order. BUT, that is my opinion and we are all entitled to them.

 

I thank the other people on this thread, for their constructive comments.

[BIGNEWY]

Dear all a reminder of our rules 

1.2 Forum members must treat each other with respect and tolerance.

1.10 Product feedback and constructive criticism is encouraged when provided in a mature and courteous manner. However, feedback that is abusive, insulting or condescending is not welcome. Additionally, to bring up a particular issue repeatedly after it has already been acknowledged will be considered "trolling" - in such cases a warning will be issued to the author and the post will be removed