Jump to content

Flaming--Cliffs--2.0  

139 members have voted

  1. 1. Flaming--Cliffs--2.0

    • Flaming Cliffs 1.0 was Political Suicide...We had fun but lets move forward ;)
    • We learned how 2 become better Pilots with NATO aircraft and and cant wait for the real deal.
    • Im warn out from all the drama. I just want 2 fly.
    • Put me back in the pit....I got some new moves and I cant wait 2 C how 2.0 is!!!


Recommended Posts

Posted

’Unsinkable buoyancy of this thread’’ what do you think?

Or may be the planet is too far away considering all this time delay due to the speed of light the message has to travel.

I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
024db430.jpg
  • Like 1

Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career?

Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell....

One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'

Posted
I think the FM is decent considering this game was originally created almost 10 years ago.

 

What I really want to see (and this has plaged LOMAC from the beginning) is less bugs, things to work as advertised, basic attention to detail.

 

Better frame rates, less crashes, because what is the point if after investing 30 mins of your time, to have it all end with a game freeze or crash.

 

I would also like to see better graphics with more detail, including better weather to take advantage of todays new systems and graphic cards.

 

The core sim itself is really, really good, but it really needs to work better and not be buggy to be worth the time investment.

 

You will see, as DCS Modules are coming.

 

This is just the last breath for LOMAC, cash for ED and a better sim to LOMAC SIMERS while DCS MIG29 or SU27 or other, come to DCS.

 

DCS is the future duude.

 

I´m sure that with next modules, upgrades like multi-core optimization, new 3D engine, weather engine and much more will come.

 

Greetings

Posted

Yeah. Like was said previously, it would cost too much to create a new graphics engine and sim from scratch. It's far cheaper to do things more gradually. I suppose the problem is the sim will always be a few years behind the newest technology. But, in a way that's a good thing. The amount of processing and other things that go on on screen to have a sim with DX10 and insane graphics would bring only but the very best and most expensive systems to their knees.

Posted
I suppose the problem is the sim will always be a few years behind the newest technology.

This wasn't the case when LOMAC arrived. It was a few years ahead of the available technology.

But, in a way that's a good thing. The amount of processing and other things that go on on screen to have a sim with DX10 and insane graphics would bring only but the very best and most expensive systems to their knees.

It was that way when LOMAC was available. Exactly that was the case. No-one had a rig to run LOMAC with all setting at high and without ending up watching a slide show.

kind regards,

Raven....

[sigpic]http://www.crc-mindreader.de/CRT/images/Birds2011.gif[/sigpic]

Posted

considering how many hours, how many megawatts of energy I have spent, how many girls I didn't met because I was having a dogfight with you all. no lifes like me, how many joysticks I have bought and destroy, how much worst my eyesight got(700 on transition lenses with anty scrach surfaces, that got scratch anyway), how bad my back hurts... I think lock on is very very expensive... just kidding I think it is cheap if you don't account all the previous aspects I mention.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...