159th_Viper Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 Ouch! :megalol: Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
Lucas_From_Hell Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 So, basically, we're totally dependant on what the military wants. Taking things all round, if they aren't interested in a (*airplane name here*) simulator, we'll never get it as a DCS title :huh:? You just hurt my feelings... :cry:
Bucic Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 Keep this image handy :D 1 F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
amalahama Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 I guess I must repeat for the nth time that countries operating a given type is not necessarily enough - ED will go for an aircraft that a country will pay to have a trainer for, and then it will transfer what they have done (minus some stuff that you likely won't miss) to us. If there's no one paying for a 64A sim, but there's countries paying for sims of other aircraft, you'll get the other aircraft. Currently this is the A-10C. Next module? Who knows. Anyway, these can't assure anything; one country can pay for an aircraft simulator and don't let ED to use the documents for an entertainment version. In fact, initially the next DCS iteration were a A-10A, no an A-10C, because the classified systems. Regards!!
joey45 Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 So, basically, we're totally dependant on what the military wants. Taking things all round, if they aren't interested in a (*Jaguar GR3a*) simulator, we'll never get it as a DCS title :huh:? You just hurt my feelings... :cry: done... :D The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
arneh Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) It looks like "somebody" has already got the -10 :P Nope, that's made without the -10 manual. I only have the AH-64A -10 manual and other documenation for the D. Edited January 29, 2010 by arneh
isoul Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Well, not that I support the idea, but we have to consider that there are more than just US and Russia in the military world, specially since Cold War ended. The thing is: The AH-64A is operated by Egypt, Greece, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. It would require a whole rework to expand possible situations, but it's still possible to include these countries in a big conflict. GGTharos, by the way, Wikipedia says (too lazy to look somewhere else) that the US Army operates 240 AH-64A, and another 500 AH-64D. Are you sure all A models were retired since January 2009? Greece uses AH-64A which are upgraded to A+ in order to be able to work together with the rest AH-64D(which acts as AFAC). I believe that excluding AH-64A from DCS would be wise only if AH-64A+/D becomes fully disclassified. Still I instist that besides the Longbow radar usage and some enhanced capabilities the D variant is very similar to A one so modeling the AH-64A is still a good thing to do!
Recommended Posts