Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

looking forward to this with great attention.

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

Posted

Frick me...

 

I won't get into too many details and I know this has been brought up a hundred times before-

 

But I wouldn't think twice about doing things I normally wouldn't ever consider doing to get this merged with DCS. I'll let you use your imagination- but it's all on the table.

 

This looks amazing...

"ENO"

Type in anger and you will make the greatest post you will ever regret.

 

"Sweetest's" Military Aviation Art

Posted
Frick me...

 

I won't get into too many details and I know this has been brought up a hundred times before-

 

But I wouldn't think twice about doing things I normally wouldn't ever consider doing to get this merged with DCS. I'll let you use your imagination- but it's all on the table.

 

This looks amazing...

 

I want it so bad for DCS also, but alas it isn't meant to be for the foreseeable future.

  • ED Team
Posted
Frick me...

 

I won't get into too many details and I know this has been brought up a hundred times before-

 

But I wouldn't think twice about doing things I normally wouldn't ever consider doing to get this merged with DCS. I'll let you use your imagination- but it's all on the table.

 

...Awkward :doh:

 

:megalol:

Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man.
DCS Rotor-Head

Posted

I was very excited about this project. But, overtime and after some images and videos, I lost it. After DCS stuff I can't see something to be excited about Combat-Helo... I don't know though...

 

By the way; Is there anyone who has difficulties about accessing the web-site?

Chrome says "No data received!"

Intel i7-14700@5.6GHz | MSI RTX4080 SuperSuprimX | Corsair V. 64GB@6400MHz. | Samsung 1TB 990 PRO SSD (Win10Homex64)
Samsung G5 32" + Samsung 18" + 2x8"TFT Displays | TM Warthog Stick w/AVA Base | VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle | TM MFD Cougars | Logitech G13, G230, G510, PZ55 & Farming Sim Panel | TIR5 & M.Quest3 VR
>>MY MODS<< | Discord: Devrim#1068

Posted (edited)
I was very excited about this project. But, overtime and after some images and videos, I lost it. After DCS stuff I can't see something to be excited about Combat-Helo... I don't know though...

 

By the way; Is there anyone who has difficulties about accessing the web-site?

Chrome says "No data received!"

I know what you mean ...

 

Tbh, I find this video a bit disappointing. Or is it just me who finds that constantly burning rocket motor a bit odd and the smoke trail, well, a bit "cheap"?

 

But damn me ... I will buy CH ... no matter what. I sooooo must fly a helo with a decent MOVABLE cannon ...

 

The Ka-50 gun is great, but a tad bit inflexible. The miniguns of the Huey are awesome - and movable - but "just" 7.62 mm. And same will be true for the upcoming AH-1G ... :/

Edited by Flagrum
Posted
Tbh, I find this video a bit disappointing. Or is it just me who finds that constantly burning rocket motor a bit odd and the smoke trail, well, a bit "cheap"?
Not just you, but it is mostly a one man project and it is still in the making. It needs a big artistic touch
Posted

Right... Needed very very big artistic touch.

 

And yes, this video disappointed me too. I really wonder, if Mr.Hawley is playin DCS World... :)

Intel i7-14700@5.6GHz | MSI RTX4080 SuperSuprimX | Corsair V. 64GB@6400MHz. | Samsung 1TB 990 PRO SSD (Win10Homex64)
Samsung G5 32" + Samsung 18" + 2x8"TFT Displays | TM Warthog Stick w/AVA Base | VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle | TM MFD Cougars | Logitech G13, G230, G510, PZ55 & Farming Sim Panel | TIR5 & M.Quest3 VR
>>MY MODS<< | Discord: Devrim#1068

  • ED Team
Posted

The CH dev team has recently said (and I'm paraphrasing) that the Leadwerks engine they use is limited for their intended application, however affordable. Their intent is for a rolling release of features to build some more capital with the ultimate goal of porting the program to a more capable engine. I'm confident they're gaining traction and development will pickup upon the release of Combat Helo: Gunnery.

Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man.
DCS Rotor-Head

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
New Blog Update......Getting VERY CLOSE to Steam Release

http://www.combat-helo.com/general/the-road-to-release-part-1/

Sweet!

 

I found his explanations about the Hellfire interesting. They often overshoot if the target is closer than 1.4 km. The sources I found speak of a minimum distance of 0.5 km, others of 1.5 km. I could imagine, 0.5 km is the bare minimum, i.e. to get the missile armed, and 1.5 km for the "effective minimum range" - which would be quite in line with CH's hellfires.

 

What are our, DCS, Hellfire's parameters?

Posted
Frick me...

 

I won't get into too many details and I know this has been brought up a hundred times before-

 

But I wouldn't think twice about doing things I normally wouldn't ever consider doing to get this merged with DCS. I'll let you use your imagination- but it's all on the table.

 

This looks amazing...

 

Old mate says that releasing it for DCS is off the table under the blog MONDAY, 20 JANUARY 2014 The World on DCS World (I think it is meant to be "The Word")

 

He then goes on to say that if his company is still around in the next 3 years and he has the money then maybe. IMO chasing this model up for DCS is a lost cause.

 

It will end up like another 3rd party dev who came on then pulled the pin. In other words, Had all the gear but no idea.

Posted

Interesting views on what makes this SIM interesting for some and not for others. What this SIM will will do for me is bring back some fun immersion in flying online simulators. CH is modeled around Janes LB2 in terms of fun to play but takes it to the next step of having a fully working cockpit and much more in depth controls/FM and avionics. No one can sit here and say that DCS graphics are any better in terms of what we have now for NOE flying. Once CH gets to the point of allowing MP (Pilot and CPG) capability along with a dynamic campaign it will rock as a good fun SIM to play which DCS right now lacks unless one of the mission builders spends many many hours building something for all to play and those missions are few and far between at best. As we all know DCS are working hard to bring us much more in terms of content and as with CH these guys need our support to keep these things going. I just hope most will buy it and play it as I think they might be pleasantly surprised.

Posted

I will back this with my bollocks even (LMFAO)!!! I am sick of waiting and waiting... patience has limits too..

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...