TheMoose Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 (edited) MIG-29 OVT pls if possible MIG-29 OVT most maneuverable aircraft in the world. Xb4ILzzDwjQ my vote Edited October 5, 2011 by TheMoose Antec 900 gaming tower, PSU: Corsair 750W, Q6600, Asus P5K, 8Gig Mushkin, Nvidia eVGA 280 GTX Superclocked 1G DDR3, SSDNOW200 Kingston Drive, TrackIr 3000+Vector, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro joystick, Saitek rudder pedals pro, Sharp 42" inch LCD Aquo. OS: windows 7 64bit.
GGTharos Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 Try the X-31. And at least it doesn't pretend to not be an experimental model. There's nothing secret about the OVT's TVC. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Laud Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 F-16's have tons of upgrades, is there any doubt? Really? I thought Blk60 was just introduced to make the bird look a little weird. :lol: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
thaisocom Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 Enough with the FSX cheerleading please, it's off topic. (and IMHO X-Plane is much better and has X-Plane 10 in development, whereas FSX has been abandoned - so please no more hyping up FSX, since many of us that use both disagree ... and are here to fight as well as fly!). That's no longer true. Microsoft has started the work on new FS called "Microsoft Flight". Check it out http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CM HAF-X | Corsair HX1000i | ASUS P8P67Pro | Intel Core i7 2600 @ 4.0GHz | Corsair CWCH70 | G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600MHz | ASUS GeForce GTX 970 4GB | Plextor M5Pro 256GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB * 2 RAID 0 | WD Caviar Green 2TB | Windows 10 Professional X64 | TM HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedal
Frostiken Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 That's no longer true. Microsoft has started the work on new FS called "Microsoft Flight". Check it out http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/ Kind of like how Simcity was still around because they made "Simcity Societies"... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Pyroflash Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 Even if FSX was abandoned by Micro$oft, I doubt that the community would be so quick to let go of it. People have been flying FS2004 since it released, and certain mod teams are still developing for it. The same would go for FSX I believe. If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.
Pilotasso Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 (edited) Really? I thought Blk60 was just introduced to make the bird look a little weird. :lol: CJ, MLU, Block50/52+Advanced, Block60, F-2. And there are others if custumers want, in similar fashion as Sukhoi is doing. So I think unless you want to put only your personal tastes forward, there is really no technical reasons to say the falcon had any less upgrades than the Hornet. Edited October 5, 2011 by Pilotasso .
manfrez01 Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 MIG-29 OVT most maneuverable aircraft in the world. Xb4ILzzDwjQ my vote Just asking More maneuverable than the 37? [sIGPIC]http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7877/72368977.jpg[/sIGPIC]
Pilotasso Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 the 37 is history. Check the 30MKI and the 35. :) .
Laud Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 CJ, MLU, Block50/52+Advanced, Block60, F-2. And there are others if custumers want, in similar fashion as Sukhoi is doing. So I think unless you want to put only your personal tastes forward, there is really no technical reasons to say the falcon had any less upgrades than the Hornet. I thought the sarcasm in my post was obvious!? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
RIPTIDE Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 I thought the sarcasm in my post was obvious!? It was to me. One thing about this forum. Even native speakers ignore or do not recognise sarcasm. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
manfrez01 Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 (edited) @Pilotasso I think you have a point:thumbup: Edited October 5, 2011 by manfrez01 [sIGPIC]http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7877/72368977.jpg[/sIGPIC]
Laud Posted October 5, 2011 Posted October 5, 2011 It was to me. One thing about this forum. Even native speakers ignore or do not recognise sarcasm. I also thought about Pilotasso might have accidently quoted the wrong post (mine). [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
TheMoose Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 (edited) Just asking More maneuverable than the 37? Either both, they would suit me find lol ;) any Russian airplanes would do for me. I just find them more graceful in the skies... NO pund intended to US or Canadian jet fighters... :) Edited October 7, 2011 by TheMoose Antec 900 gaming tower, PSU: Corsair 750W, Q6600, Asus P5K, 8Gig Mushkin, Nvidia eVGA 280 GTX Superclocked 1G DDR3, SSDNOW200 Kingston Drive, TrackIr 3000+Vector, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro joystick, Saitek rudder pedals pro, Sharp 42" inch LCD Aquo. OS: windows 7 64bit.
Moa Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 That's no longer true. Microsoft has started the work on new FS called "Microsoft Flight". Check it out http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/ The only relation "Flight" has to "Flight Simulator" is in the name. Flight is being designed by a different bunch of developers (the FSX developers were laid off => hence I used the word "abandoned") and is for a more "casual" audience than Flight Simulator. I don't know exactly how "casual" this is (details on Flight are rare), but for sure it will not be as good at the simulation aspect as FSX or X-Plane (or DCS). Conclusion, FSX is abandoned. I would also consider FSX 'more abandoned' than Falcon, since the latter benefited immensely from a code leak - which has allowed it to live on and improve. Perhaps Lockheed Martin might make FSX++ commercial available, perhaps not. Until then it is all vapourware and FSX stands abandoned by the rights-holder (although still heavily used and modded). Just as well ED (and X-Plane) are keeping the torch alive for the high realism crowd.
thaisocom Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 The only relation "Flight" has to "Flight Simulator" is in the name. Flight is being designed by a different bunch of developers (the FSX developers were laid off => hence I used the word "abandoned") and is for a more "casual" audience than Flight Simulator. I don't know exactly how "casual" this is (details on Flight are rare), but for sure it will not be as good at the simulation aspect as FSX or X-Plane (or DCS). Conclusion, FSX is abandoned. I would also consider FSX 'more abandoned' than Falcon, since the latter benefited immensely from a code leak - which has allowed it to live on and improve. Perhaps Lockheed Martin might make FSX++ commercial available, perhaps not. Until then it is all vapourware and FSX stands abandoned by the rights-holder (although still heavily used and modded). Just as well ED (and X-Plane) are keeping the torch alive for the high realism crowd.I wouldn't say that until I get my hand on the final product. The game seem to be developed from Microsoft ESP which developed from FSX. Eventhough ACE was shut down, Microsoft didn't laid off their core members and they are working on this title. Anyway this is just off the topic here. :doh: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CM HAF-X | Corsair HX1000i | ASUS P8P67Pro | Intel Core i7 2600 @ 4.0GHz | Corsair CWCH70 | G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600MHz | ASUS GeForce GTX 970 4GB | Plextor M5Pro 256GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB * 2 RAID 0 | WD Caviar Green 2TB | Windows 10 Professional X64 | TM HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedal
kobac Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 Despite the apparent wishes of this community I think F-15E Strike Eagle will be the next ED DCS aircraft. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Everything is possible ...
HerrKaputt Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 The only relation "Flight" has to "Flight Simulator" is in the name. Flight is being designed by a different bunch of developers (the FSX developers were laid off => hence I used the word "abandoned") and is for a more "casual" audience than Flight Simulator. I don't know exactly how "casual" this is (details on Flight are rare), but for sure it will not be as good at the simulation aspect as FSX or X-Plane (or DCS). Conclusion, FSX is abandoned. I would also consider FSX 'more abandoned' than Falcon, since the latter benefited immensely from a code leak - which has allowed it to live on and improve. Perhaps Lockheed Martin might make FSX++ commercial available, perhaps not. Until then it is all vapourware and FSX stands abandoned by the rights-holder (although still heavily used and modded). Just as well ED (and X-Plane) are keeping the torch alive for the high realism crowd. I hope FSX doesn't get the same fate as Age of Empires. Age of Empires 3 was an awesome game, with brilliant graphics for its time (and for now for that matter), great gameplay, some concern with historical accuracy, and various civilizations you could play with (8 on the original game, 14 with all expansions). I never played AoE2 consistently, but it is rated even higher than AoE3 and multiplayer communities are still going strong on it. Now, Age of Empires Online is free-to-play with cartoonish low-poly graphics, gameplay which reminds me of Farmville, spells to summon allies, and if you want to unlock one full civilization (to get the benefits of paying players), it costs $20, i.e., roughly half of a full game. I wouldn't be surprised if this micro-transaction model was used in Flight as well.
Madman777 Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 The next aircraft will be a Hornet. If ED doesn't jump in a post within the next half hour and say it's not...then we know it's a Hornet! Countdown starting now.... i7-12700k, 32GB Ram, RTX 3060 12GB, TrackIR 5, Lots of SSD Space, etc etc DCS World - All the cool modules
EtherealN Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 It may or may not be a hornet, and that tactic won't work. ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
GGTharos Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 The next aircraft will be a Hornet. If ED doesn't jump in a post within the next half hour and say it's not...then we know it's a Hornet! Countdown starting now.... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Phantom88 Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 Ok I've changed my Avatar to Step off my One man Campaign for a F-15E StrikeEagle.........Who's with me??:thumbup: Patrick
manfrez01 Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia---Navy/Mikoyan-Gurevich-MiG-29K-%289-41%29/1968181/L/ Can I wish five:D [sIGPIC]http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7877/72368977.jpg[/sIGPIC]
jp203000 Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 (edited) I don't care if it is hornet , I just care if it is a fighter. A fixed wing tells us it's most likely a fighter. now I conclude it to be F15C. It takes much less work to develop F15c than F18c. I think ED may well tell us its type though they can't tell us exactly what it is for certain reasons. Time is up ! Edited October 7, 2011 by jp203000
Recommended Posts