jazjar Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 WOW! I got bored and wen't into the editor, where I saw "F-15E" as an aircraft option. I thought "hmm, never seen this one before" and set up a simple route with 9 t-72s and a strela that I programmed the thing to attack with Mavs and LGBs. I started the mission, and the first thing I thought when I saw the model with A sniper XR loaded underneath it was " I am going to kill ED if they do not make this next!" ( I know you won't, just exaggerating :) ) like seriously! I peeked into the engine turbines and found detailed fans spinning on both ends!I then watched the thing take out a strela and a t-72, then turn to a base without emptying its LGBs which I barely noticed because I was so addicted to the model. Then I wanted to see the damage on this thing so I put a route over a SA-15 TOR, and then after the missile hit, I watched the wing shred and the pilots eject, and while it was spiraling towards the ground, I saw the wing shred even further, and the nose cone flew off, revealing a beautiful radar, then finally, the crash. W-O-W!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Roadhog Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Yeah, the F-15E is probably the most detailed model in the game besides the a-10. Makes you wonder if that is indeed next.
kylania Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Christmas Cheer - A Landing Practice Mission : Beta Paint Schemes : HOTAS Keyboard Map : Bingo Fuel - A DCS A-10C Movie
andysim Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) 100% agree with you. The F-15 is the most detailed AI ive seen. I cant imagine the hard work that went into getting in looking just right. The afterburner effects on it are like nothing ive seen before. They look perfect. :megalol: Even the Linkages that control the nozel openings are modeled. If you look at the F15 in spot view then hit F4 so you are looking at it from the top then turn your view round 180deg so you are looking back at the engines you can watch them open close up. Just need to make a fast waypoint (1100Km so they use the ABs. Edited November 27, 2010 by andysim
Furia Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 F-15E the is the most sexiest plane on this sim. I am dreaming to hear this one would be the next DCS Module. The ammount of missions we could do with this one, even the A2A role, is just endless. Sexy Sexy Sexy. :P [sIGPIC]http://menorca.infotelecom.es/~raulurbina/ESA/banner_furia.png[/sIGPIC]
SkidMark Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Found this over here >> http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=58337&highlight=screenshots&page=223 ....very nice...indeed.
Bucic Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Makes you realize how pitiful FPS 3D modellers perform compared to 'ours' at ED. I pay them my regards! :thumbup: F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
hassata Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Looks like a labor of love for a couple of the ED modelers. Can't imagine it being a module-or at least the next module, [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
jazjar Posted November 27, 2010 Author Posted November 27, 2010 Can't imagine being modeled next for a number of reasons. They seem to have the jet fighter and afterburner down beautifully, but you would need to model radar and a2a combat again, and model it more realistic than FC2. You would also need to model a radar with a2a and a2g modes. and finally, front seat and back seat, I won't say anything more :) . And since grey beauty here can get from the bottom of the map to the top ( probably with a few fuel tanks ), they might even have to face the prospect of a DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN! I expect ED to take little "bites" into their meat first and make just a front seat back seat fighter without any radar, such as a earlier Tornado IDS, then make a radar fighter ( F-16 ) then combine all their knowledge into the F-15E. just my thoughts! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Cali Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Yeah, the F-15E is probably the most detailed model in the game besides the a-10. Makes you wonder if that is indeed next. That doesn't mean anything, in lock on and FC1 the F-18 was very detailed and yet it was never added. All we can do is hope and wait. i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED
Steel Jaw Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Mud Hen would ROCK. F16 been done to death. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Boberro Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 ... and this is why we do need once more :D Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Fox One Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Thanks for making me notice the beautiful F-15 models. I thought only F-15E has a new model, and to my surprise the F-15C model is as detailed! I was curious about cockpit interior and is as detailed as A-10C in external view. There are even TEWS avionics boxes. And the nozzles are a work of art! 1 My DCS videos
rud Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 we can hope, we can dream, we can pray. Boy how I would love a two seater! I almost always play Black shark and now the A-10C with just one other buddy on a LAN. Doing some front-seat / back-seat co-op missions would just be a blast.
Miro Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Yes. F-15E Will be better than F-16 or F-18 :thumbup: :pilotfly:
hassata Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 As long as this is turning into another wish list thread: F-18C/Carrier ops :P I hope someone from ED chimes in and tells us why the Hen is rendered in such amazing detail. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
andysim Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) since when has the F-16 been "Done to death" anyway? I mean apart from some FSX addons here and there and of course Falcon4 (no longer in development it seems. Freefalcon/Openfalcon <(so buggy its not even funny, ive never been able to run them for more than a few minutes) We really really really need a new F-16 sim with the quality of DCS/ED Edited November 27, 2010 by andysim
jazjar Posted November 27, 2010 Author Posted November 27, 2010 Right, we must use the f-16 as a stepping stone to programming and modeling such a modern work of art. I personally am rooting for the tornado IDS, but hey, what is the possibility of that getting released, huh? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Bubb Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 I'd say making the next DCS module an F-16 will be both a good strategic and financial decision. By making an F-16 module they will essentially put a hammer down on the entire FalconAF/OpenFalcon/FreeFalcon community, in turn it will bring much more serious simmers to the community and also the sales will be higher by a mile. After doing the Ka-50 and the A-10 i can safely say that an ED F-16 module will be the best in the market for decades to come. And will always be remembered as the golden egg that marked the next step in simming for all those who fly the old generation stuff. My 2 cents :)
Greb Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 I have to agree with Bubb! I like the F16 and I think it would be fun to fly in. I flew a lot of Falcon back in the day. It has been done to death but not to the degree ED and DCS and can do it. It is a multi role and it would drag the falcon crowd to the table. It just makes sense!
LeadDoctor Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Would be happy with an F16 or F15E. Already have the controls for both. AMD 955, Asus M4A79t, 12GB 1600 cas7 Mushkin red line and black line, EVGA 670 FTW, Samsung 840 SSD 250GB, Samsung spin point 620GB x3 extra storage.
power5 Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Why the F15E over the C? I would rather have the single seat. They both do multi role don't they? I think I would rather have just about anything besides an F jet for the next module though. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Aaron i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5 BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109
KillaALF Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Why the F15E over the C? I would rather have the single seat. They both do multi role don't they? E = ground pounder. Sure, she can defend herself, but A/A is not the strong suit of the hen. C = air superiority/pure fighter ("not a pound for air-to-ground")
GGTharos Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 Drop the CFT's and it'll do the C's job in a pinch, but it isn't its purpose. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
KillaALF Posted November 27, 2010 Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) How would you do that, they're part of the airframe and can't be dropped. Strike that, they can be removed, but from what I can gather they cannot be dropped like external tanks. Edited November 27, 2010 by KillaALF
Recommended Posts