S77th-konkussion Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 :smartass:When you say "TiE" fighter do you mean; :D http://www.moviewavs.com/php/sounds/?id=bst&media=MP3S&type=Movies&movie=Star_Wars_Episode_IV_A_New_Hope"e=tiefighters2.txt&file=tiefighters2.mp3 :joystick: without the background music of course.. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
RIPTIDE Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Americans really need to get more than 2 federal parties to vote for, with that bi-polar you can only choose establishment-Frick or establishment-Frack. I cast my lines and I hooked. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
LARGE Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 I seriously don't think that airship is below or equal to 4.5 generation technology. Its says its from a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.. so its like -5 gen? btw i ve got this on a very high res if anyone needs it i'll give a link..
aaron886 Posted February 3, 2011 Posted February 3, 2011 Americans really need to get more than 2 federal parties to vote for, with that bi-polar you can only choose establishment-Frick or establishment-Frack. Canadians should be worried about having to pay for bandwidth, not our bipartisan system. :lol:
mikoyan Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 I seriously don't think that airship is below or equal to 4.5 generation technology. puff a raptor would eat that
revalence Posted February 4, 2011 Author Posted February 4, 2011 ... search the forum, you'll get all the opinions on the matter that you need. Ok... sure... However, this post is already pretty well set already... Any moderator can delete this thread (Stupid me :D) Thanks all, and oh, LARGE, that is a aircraft I am hoping to see in the near or.... far-fetched future. :smilewink: Thanks all. -Andrew (Revalence)
ED Team Groove Posted February 4, 2011 ED Team Posted February 4, 2011 I think moving it to chit-chat will be the appropriate action. Our Forum Rules: http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en
RIPTIDE Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 puff a raptor would eat that Ya... The Imperial Class Star Destroyer has a lot of work to do on its RCS. :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
LARGE Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 Who do you think would win the destroyer versus the Liberty class star cruiser?
BiPod Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 Hi LARGE, What you appear to have there is either an imperial I or Imperial II star destroyer. They are virtually identical from exterior appearance, but the Imperial II has almost twice the firepower and more than twice the shielding. In the tactical gameplay of Star Wars:Rebellion the Mon Calimari Cruiser would win against an Imperial I even after taking account of the star destroyers fighter capacity which is twice that of the Cruiser. The battledamage would however take a long time to repair, and I would expect to effectively lose the Cruiser from the order of battle for about a year. The Imperial II Star Destroyer is another matter altogether. Without concentrated fire from several capital ships, you would have no chance against it. In a one on one battle you would need either a Dauntless Cruiser or Bulwark Battlecruiser, but good luck finding one of those. This is all from Star Wars:Rebellion. Other sources DO differ! Hope this helps your next mission, BiPod.
effte Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 And here I thought I had a chance of actually winning the geek world championship... I admit my defeat! :D By the way, do you have charts or tracks to prove what you are saying? ;) ----- Introduction to UTM/MGRS - Trying to get your head around what trim is, how it works and how to use it? - DCS helos vs the real world.
BiPod Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 And here I thought I had a chance of actually By the way, do you have charts or tracks to prove what you are saying? ;) I could include a screenshot of the ingame encyclopedia and a FRAPS recording of a battle, but I think I've gone too far already. My point is that LARGEs question is not just hypothetical. In some games you do have to actually know this stuff. BiPod.
LARGE Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 and I thought I was a Star Wars nerd lol By the way the destroyer's shield generators are much exposed and easy to hit, what if the Mon Calimari concentrate the fire firstly on them :)
BiPod Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 Well, it worked in ROTJ. Funny that Ackbar did not attempt to repeat his success. You would think he would learn from this.
effte Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 And I'm down to third place... :D ----- Introduction to UTM/MGRS - Trying to get your head around what trim is, how it works and how to use it? - DCS helos vs the real world.
celticcoho Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 (edited) I think moving it to chit-chat will be the appropriate action. It would seem that DCS is Tired of your Humor or Chit Chat that binds the community as one..I already got the BanHammer threat for beta 5, which never was meant for us anyway. if we can't talk and chat, joke and share, WHY are we here? EVEN in the Military, we did Joke, Chat, Share, Learn and Protect our community, as it were. If this keeps up, With all due Respect, Your Followers(Soldiers) Will Revolt. What is everyone doing Wrong?:mad: Though i have had Great Info from Comrades around the World, and have learned so much from them, as well as a good laugh too. I think it is time to just wait for what I paid for. Feel like not a member, just a customer, What a shame. Some one tell me when final release can be downloaded..best to all Jim Edited February 4, 2011 by celticcoho 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Celticcoho (OriginFreedom) WIN 7 64 bit, I7975 at 3.6ghz,X58 Classified 3 Mobo, 6gb Corsair 2000 ram, 2 ea ATI 5870 Eyefinity 6 2gb's , 27" Ultra Sharp,(main view), 3 23"touch screens , Tm Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals Track IR 5,:D JIM.:book:
BiPod Posted February 4, 2011 Posted February 4, 2011 To be fair, this is a commercial site and ED has every right to decide the tone of discussions to be allowed. I already feel a little guilty about the sillyness of my own posts in the last couple of days. This thread was highjacked to the disappointment of the OP, and it was only moved not locked. To me, that was a green light to start posting as I had previously refrained from joining in. If there are no standards, then things may get out of hand and the usefullness of the forums will be diminished, but your point is taken about the need to allow some humour to "bind the community". BiPod.
159th_Viper Posted February 5, 2011 Posted February 5, 2011 It would seem that DCS is Tired of your Humor or Chit Chat that binds the community as one..I already got the BanHammer threat for beta 5, which never was meant for us anyway. if we can't talk and chat, joke and share, WHY are we here? EVEN in the Military, we did Joke, Chat, Share, Learn and Protect our community, as it were. If this keeps up, With all due Respect, Your Followers(Soldiers) Will Revolt. What is everyone doing Wrong?:mad: Though i have had Great Info from Comrades around the World, and have learned so much from them, as well as a good laugh too. I think it is time to just wait for what I paid for. Feel like not a member, just a customer, What a shame. Some one tell me when final release can be downloaded..best to all Jim Quit the Witch-Hunt :) This thread was moved for the sole reason that, due to the content, it did not belong in the forum in which is was originally posted. Reasons for said moves are pretty obvious I would have thought: To inter alia facilitate forum navigation and troubleshooting.......To have sub-forums cluttered with threads that do not relate (as is clearly the case in this instance - see post #10 as an example) is,for the lack of a better word, messy. No Harm no Foul ;) Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
celticcoho Posted February 5, 2011 Posted February 5, 2011 Quit the Witch-Hunt :) This thread was moved for the sole reason that, due to the content, it did not belong in the forum in which is was originally posted. Reasons for said moves are pretty obvious I would have thought: To inter alia facilitate forum navigation and troubleshooting.......To have sub-forums cluttered with threads that do not relate (as is clearly the case in this instance - see post #10 as an example) is,for the lack of a better word, messy. No Harm no Foul ;) MY APOLIGIES TOO ALL!! Even those who chatted with me, in humor or to tell me to take a hike.. Ok, Best i just GO, Good luck all and no worries to anyone.JIM [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Celticcoho (OriginFreedom) WIN 7 64 bit, I7975 at 3.6ghz,X58 Classified 3 Mobo, 6gb Corsair 2000 ram, 2 ea ATI 5870 Eyefinity 6 2gb's , 27" Ultra Sharp,(main view), 3 23"touch screens , Tm Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals Track IR 5,:D JIM.:book:
Demokrator Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 I think this one:D. Oh, and btw watch from 6:44 till the end:lol:.
jazjar Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 BiPod, no, that isw not an imperial or imperial 2 class star destroyer. It's odd curves identify it to be from the planet of Mon Calamari. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
BiPod Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 BiPod, no, that isw not an imperial or imperial 2 class star destroyer. It's odd curves identify it to be from the planet of Mon Calamari. I was referring back to the earlier posts of the Star Destroyer (10,15,17). They were being compared with the post above mine (34), which was the Mon Calamari craft. I stand by my comments.;)
Recommended Posts