diveplane Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 really wish the dev team added 3 sea states in lockon =calm =moderate =heavy would make for a great landing on the kuz in poor wet condtions have the ships pitch and roll in rough seas... https://www.youtube.com/user/diveplane11 DCS Audio Modding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enigma6584 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 That would be fun indeed. Maybe some day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Feedback Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Lol, that's the reason people buy X-plane :p Yes, it would be great, but I guess it's a lot of work, because the collision detection (the deck and other things) would have to move constantly in 3 directions. Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALDEGA Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I don't see how collision detection is an issue. Anyway, this is part of a more general "realistic weather" request. Su-33 with AFM on Admiral Kuznetsov in rough seas :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EVIL-SCOTSMAN Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 any of you out there with pacific fighters, trying to land on the carrier when the weather is set at its worst is a nightmare, the pitching and rolling of the carrier can be seen from a good distance, and it just looks crazy, i would think it would be 10x harder in lockon to land on the carrier in such weather...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldcrew Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 but they'll be an even bigger framerate issue with long threads of why they can't get 50 fps from their 7800GTX SLI :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfa Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 really wish the dev team added 3 sea states in lockon =calm =moderate =heavy would make for a great landing on the kuz in poor wet condtions have the ships pitch and roll in rough seas... Yes I agree something like that would be great :) On a more modest note, it would be nice to have ships produce a wake as the move across the sea - it looks a little weird without it :) Cheers, - JJ. JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Feedback Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 but they'll be an even bigger framerate issue with long threads of why they can't get 50 fps from their 7800GTX SLI :) errm 50? more like 15 if you ask me :p (well, I don't have an uber pc, and my cpu is bottlenecking everything, but I get 30 fps on medium low, and like 20-24 fps in the su-25t) Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brit_Radar_Dude Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 On a more modest note, it would be nice to have ships produce a wake as the move across the sea - it looks a little weird without it Yep, sure would. You may be shocked but I got IL-2 after a year of flying Lockon and was amazed at just how nice the sea and ship wakes look in IL-2 (even thought the ship models look a bit poor compared to Lockon). [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Sorry Death, you lose! It was Professor Plum.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team Groove Posted September 9, 2005 ED Team Share Posted September 9, 2005 Guys do you see an planes or seamen on the deck of the carrier on the above picture ? I think flight deck operations are suspended on such a heavy sea. Our Forum Rules: http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
192nd_Erdem Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Probably,I see some kind of "Run for your life" situation in that pic :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diveplane Posted September 9, 2005 Author Share Posted September 9, 2005 maybe this pic http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105472759.jpg&s=x4 http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105481540.jpg&s=x4 http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105491238.jpg&s=x4 http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105505459.jpg&s=x4 http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105520441.jpg&s=x4 we need some smoke out the kuz stack as well http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105524322.jpg&s=x4 https://www.youtube.com/user/diveplane11 DCS Audio Modding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfa Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 we need some smoke out the kuz stack as well http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=9/25105524322.jpg&s=x4 I agree - some smoke effect would be as relevant for Russian ships as it would for Russian fighters :) . Cheers, - JJ. JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
169th_Crusty Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Guys do you see an planes or seamen on the deck of the carrier on the above picture ? I think flight deck operations are suspended on such a heavy sea. hehe - Jeez, I get sick just looking at that pic (thread starter). Yes, there`s a limit out there... ...would be nice though to have a moderately pitching and heaving deck on occasion for some extra challange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfa Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 hehe - Jeez, I get sick just looking at that pic (thread starter). Yes, there`s a limit out there... ...would be nice though to have a moderately pitching and heaving deck on occasion for some extra challange. Yeah....such stormy conditions would probably be a bit over the top. But it would be nice with a "choppy" sea state to go with the windy conditions already implemented :) Cheers, - JJ. JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts