golfsierra2 Posted November 25, 2012 Posted November 25, 2012 How about this as your wingman? kind regards, Raven.... [sigpic]http://www.crc-mindreader.de/CRT/images/Birds2011.gif[/sigpic]
Pilotasso Posted November 25, 2012 Posted November 25, 2012 It looks like somenthing I want to shoot down due to beeing so damn ugly. :] .
Exorcet Posted November 25, 2012 Posted November 25, 2012 None. FC should not continue, if for anything else to avoid license issues with Ubisoft. Though, more Su-25 level planes that are fighters would be nice depending on how long it takes to get full DCS level fighters. Actually given that Russian planes are so hard to find data for, maybe FC+ level Russian fighters for DCS World would be an option (though on the other hand, I personally see nothing wrong with educated guessing when the info is lacking - at least in the case of the Russian planes because it seems like DCS won't see many of them otherwise). Awaiting: DCS F-15C Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files
Agg Posted November 25, 2012 Posted November 25, 2012 None. FC should not continue, if for anything else to avoid license issues with Ubisoft.Agreed! FC3 is okay while we wait for the next DCS module, but I agree that this should be the last FC version.
104th_Crunch Posted November 26, 2012 Posted November 26, 2012 Yes, when it comes to ED anyway, I hope the focus now is mainly with the next DCS level fighter jet. Soon I hope we have one Western and one Eastern jet, then anyone can make what ever they want after that :) 1
Teknetinium Posted December 6, 2012 Posted December 6, 2012 (edited) I wish there will be TWS for mig-29S, And I wish that it would be possible to convert it to Su-27, I know it is unrealistic but we could pretend as it is early upgrade, it would be more realistic then Su-27S usage of R-77 in FC2 servers. Edited December 6, 2012 by Teknetinium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
Frostie Posted December 6, 2012 Posted December 6, 2012 "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 'Red 5'. Lord Flashheart 51st PVO "Bisons" - 100 KIAP Regiment Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
159th_Viper Posted December 6, 2012 Posted December 6, 2012 ...... it would be more realistic then Su-27S usage of R-77 in FC2 servers. TWS can only be used with R-77's. Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
D4n Posted December 6, 2012 Posted December 6, 2012 Though, more Su-25 level planes that are fighters would be nice depending on how long it takes to get full DCS level fighters. What u mean by "level" ? DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 4060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence
104th_Crunch Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 (edited) What u mean by "level" ? He means that the Su-25T and Su-25 in FC use an advanced flight model, where as the other jets use a standard flight model. Death to SFM! :gun_rifle:or at least offer it at as an option for easy mode only. Edited December 7, 2012 by Crunch
D4n Posted December 10, 2012 Posted December 10, 2012 (edited) Difference between std. and adv. flight model pls? -.- :P :) Edited December 10, 2012 by DanielNL DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 4060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence
104th_Crunch Posted December 11, 2012 Posted December 11, 2012 The best thing to do is in FC2 or FC3 is try a 25, and compare it to the other jets. There is just a lot more going on with the 25s flight dynamics similar to the A-10C and P-51 releases. There is more programing and scripting to take in account more flight dynamics as they happen. Stalls and landings characteristics for example. Fly a the Su-27 into a stall and it will more or less go in to a simple series of scripts that play out very similar each time you stall. Fly a 25 into a stall and it the flight model will take in to account things as they happen, current speed, current AoA when the stall happened, etc. The physics are more realistic and more detailed in AFM. There is a lot more to it, but that gives you an idea.
Frogisis Posted December 11, 2012 Posted December 11, 2012 (edited) You really can feel the difference with the AFM - It's much more like you're actually moving through a fluid instead of just moving in the "abstract" way that an airplane moves. The feeling of inertia seems a lot thinner without it, as well. When the plane starts to do something you don't want, there are physical signs beforehand, such as shaking, whereas with the basic flight model you just go into some bad state if you break a hidden rule. ~ All things being equal, I'd rather see the current selection of aircraft get nice new models, cockpits, and flight dynamics, but if that's not in the cards, it'd be neat to see some Western European aircraft join the lineup, like the Tornado, the Gripen, and the Rafale. I know the Tornado's got a lot of fans, and those last two I think are just gorgeous. I'd also like to see some other regions of the world join in on the coalitions - It'd be nice to get China, South Korea, and Japan in on the action, as well as places in South America, the Middle East (beyond Turkey and Israel), and Africa. Also, didn't there used to be just "Insurgents"? Would be down for seeing that restored, along with a "UN" side, with those spiffy white paint jobs in the User Files section. It'd be neat if we could even set up 3-way conflicts, though I'm not sure if there's actually modern military doctrine for that which we could draw from (what color would they be? etc.) Edited December 11, 2012 by Frogisis For when it goes wrong: Win10x64, GTX1080, Intel i7 @3.5 GHz, 32GB DDR3, Warthog HOTAS, Saitek combat rudder pedals, TrackIR 5 / Vive Pro, a case of Pabst, The Funk
Recommended Posts