WildBillKelsoe Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 All I want is Eagle Dynamics Advanced Flight Model. In A-10C, it took some time to get to 'be one' with the aircraft. I don't care about naval. I think F-16 would be the greatest add-on. 1. HARM capability. 2. A-G capability 3. Air to Air capability 4. Refuel compatible. 5. F-16's are rock solid. AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
104th_Crunch Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 ;1658307']I'm looking forward to the long missions! When DCS F-18 comes out I'll build a MP mission with the US Carrier based just north of the Bosphorus Straight so all sorties to the mainland have to involve refueling etc. Shoot off the CAT Grab some gas Shoot some fools Run some SEAD / DEAD Bomb a bridge Shoot some more fools Grab some gas Trap *Sigh* can't wait :D This scenario is not possible in any modern sim at a DCS level. When a F18 comes out for DCS, hopefully by ED, there will be nothing like it. I can't freakin wait!
Cali Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 This scenario is not possible in any modern sim at a DCS level. When a F18 comes out for DCS, hopefully by ED, there will be nothing like it. I can't freakin wait! The Su-33 can do that, which was something I loved to do, very hard though and no actives. The tanker in every mission is key to getting fuel. Why would someone fly 60 miles past their base to tank? when they can just land and be closer, which most people did. i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED
SUBS17 Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 This scenario is not possible in any modern sim at a DCS level. When a F18 comes out for DCS, hopefully by ED, there will be nothing like it. I can't freakin wait! Already doing it all in FSX with the VRS SH, that IMO is DCS level I have had to do just as much study for this as DCS A-10C/DCS KA50.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
104th_Crunch Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 The Su-33 is great, but it's not to DCS standards, and the F/A-18 has guided A2G. FSX is great as well, but there is no combat at the level of even the current FC/DCS standard. Listen, I want that F/A-18 now damn it. Nothing you're going to type gonna change my mind :)
Cali Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 F-16 or F-18 and I'll be happy with either one.........ok, I'll be happy with the 15 too. I think it's the F-16... i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED
AliasVBA1 Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 F/A-18C Reports question for Wags Longtime since I have posted here since Kato and I started the Virtual Blue Angels, I was reading over the sim hq interview and also see now Wags avatar is a F/A-18 C . Are the reports of that being the next DCS Aircraft true? If so I'm going to jump for joy!!!.. also how are my beloved VBA doing? report in guys! :)
Hammer Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) ROTFLMAO! Honor is important. Edited February 1, 2013 by Hammer
Sierra99 Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) That's a false statement, there are a lot of people that would be very happy with a F-16. +1... I'd love a DCS level F-16CG/CJ but for reasons completely unrelated to the ongoing discussion... I paid good money for a Thrustmaster cougar about 10 years ago and I'd like to get some real use out of it. (And Please don't suggest BMS... Yeah, I downloaded it, installed it and it kinda works. But after 3 hours trying to figure out graphics setting and trying to get my warthog to work...I gave up. DCS looks a thousand times better with 1/10 the hassle.) A previous post also alluded to going fast...while I enjoy the pace of CAS missions in the A10...you can order a pizza and eat during a flight from Tbilisi to Sochi... Sometimes going fast is just good for the soul. No matter if we get a -16, -18 or something else, as long as it can carry HARMS... We'll be doing better. ( come to think of it...wouldn't the HTS modeling be the same for both aircraft? ) I also think as far as fidelity...Aircraft such as the F-15, F-16 and F-18 would be better candidates for the DCS treatment due to their age. Not that they are " old" but they are from the same era as the A-10.., Finally, if the ever figure out the one seat two seat logic, I too would like to see the AH-64... Counterpoint to the go fast, go slow... Hover Gadgets Edited February 1, 2013 by Sierra99 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Primary Computer ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5. -={TAC}=-DCS Server Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.
WildBillKelsoe Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) First off, nothing confirmed by ED. Second, I'd love an F-16 over the F-18. Nevermind the naval ops. The GMR of F-16 is second to none, IMHO. And besides, the F-16 is a world class multirole fighter, whereas the F-18, is NATO limited. Most countries if not all have at least a parked F-16 somewhere. +1... I'd love a DCS level F-16CG/CJ but for reasons completely unrelated to the ongoing discussion... I paid good money for a Thrustmaster cougar about 10 years ago and I'd like to get some real use out of it. (And Please don't suggest BMS... Yeah, I downloaded it, installed it and it kinda works. But after 3 hours trying to figure out graphics setting and trying to get my warthog to work...I gave up. DCS looks a thousand times better with 1/10 the hassle.) A previous post also alluded to going fast...while I enjoy the pace of CAS missions in the A10...you can order a pizza and eat during a flight from Tbilisi to Sochi... Sometimes going fast is just good for the soul. No matter if we get a -16, -18 or something else, as long as it can carry HARMS... We'll be doing better. ( come to think of it...wouldn't the HTS modeling be the same for both aircraft? ) I also think as far as fidelity...Aircraft such as the F-15, F-16 and F-18 would be better candidates for the DCS treatment due to their age. Not that they are " old" but they are from the same era as the A-10.., Finally, if the ever figure out the one seat two seat logic, I too would like to see the AH-64... Counterpoint to the go fast, go slow... Hover Gadgets Are you my mind? I've been looking for the past 3 days for FSX longbow (alphasim's) and can't find it. Best match is virtavia's. Same for the viper, except something wrong with Iris's website, and the confusion of selecting that or aerosim's Viper. Edited February 1, 2013 by WildBillKelsoe AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
Recommended Posts