anivanov Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 well, i must have a good thinking before i can say he is the best aircraft we have ever seen.On one side(which is better i think) he"s got two roles for a price of one. on the other side(which is worser) he doesn"t have real caracteristic of fighter.......:icon_evil:icon_evil:icon_evil:icon_evil:icon_evil this is just a trick......
GGTharos Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 What do mean it doesn't have real characterstics of a fighter? It carries air to air weapons, it's fast, has high thrust, and high maneuverability ... potentially helmet-mounted display, and hwo-knows-what-else? What are you talking about, and why are you posting this in screenshots and movies? O.o [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
anivanov Posted December 11, 2005 Author Posted December 11, 2005 GG, i"m not just talking about tehnical support, i"m talking about spirit.it is true that he"s got who-knows-what-else.but it looks like he"s just a little bit inert( I DON"T WANT TO OFFEND ANYONE WITH THIS).this why i"m posting this here it was a mistake......lol.........my reflexes..........i thought i"m not in screns and movies thread.......sorry.......my....mistake......:icon_redf:icon_redf:icon_redf P.S. i just want to know what other peoples think about this plane.:icon_roll:icon_roll:icon_roll
GGTharos Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 But I don't understandw what you mean by inert, or spirit :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
anivanov Posted December 11, 2005 Author Posted December 11, 2005 he must have some soul (you know, same thing is with the girls:cool::cool::cool:, or a sport car-ferrari has a long history, that"s why he is so popular except good desing and horse power) or i can"t look at him like a whole.:icon_wink:icon_wink:icon_wink:icon_wink this thing with inert-he really looks clumsy........again i don"t wont to offend anyone.;);););)
SuperKungFu Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 inert-he really looks clumsy .....are you talking about the shape of the F/A-22? Because you do know it has stealth. That'y probably why it looks "clumsy" [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
GGTharos Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Hehe. Well, it won't win any beauty contests, that's for sure ... but I'm still not sure how you can say it has no soul. It's fast, powerful, and even if it looks 'clumsy' it's extremely agile. ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
jorvilla Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Hello everyone; real quick, I just wanted to show some pictures of this amazing creation. I hope you guys enjoy it. Thank you. 1
Yellonet Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 It's even uglier than the F-117. i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5
Mobius1 Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I think it's a great looking, next-gen fighter.:D Stupid thermals...
SuperKungFu Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Ugly things do have its own beauty, it’s called inner beauty. Like the An-225, A-10, and F-22, all of them are ugly but damn they kick ass at what they do. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
anivanov Posted December 24, 2005 Author Posted December 24, 2005 Ugly things do have its own beauty, it’s called inner beauty. Like the An-225, A-10, and F-22, all of them are ugly but damn they kick ass at what they do. yeah, i agree just for the first two, but the last one it seems to me like a 2-months baby.........;););););)
zaGURUinzaSKY Posted December 25, 2005 Posted December 25, 2005 I think it's a great looking, next-gen fighter.:D yep, we just have to get used of it, it'll be nicer on next years to our eyes.. and anyway this is a weapon not a car.... Robbie.
anivanov Posted December 25, 2005 Author Posted December 25, 2005 maybe today"s multi role aircrafts looks ugly because aircrafts like f-14 and 15, su-27 have history and a lot of succes missions behind them................................and i wish you marry christmas and a lot flight hours and a succesfull landings!!!
SKK Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 maybe today"s multi role aircrafts looks ugly because aircrafts like f-14 and 15, su-27 have history and a lot of succes missions behind them................................and i wish you marry christmas and a lot flight hours and a succesfull landings!!!Well not the Sukhoi, unfortunately.
Animalmother Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 It hasnt exactly had an outstandingly succesfull combat record.
Annihilator911 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 its not ugly! its really cool and i like it.
anivanov Posted January 25, 2006 Author Posted January 25, 2006 its not ugly! its really cool and i like it. i don"t like it, yet. maybe i will.........who knows......
nscode Posted January 31, 2006 Posted January 31, 2006 Because you do know it has stealth. Does it have a built-in fax system that informes the enemy radar station to "please, ignore this aircraft" or... ;) Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
GGTharos Posted January 31, 2006 Posted January 31, 2006 Yes, typically in the form of 'your radar waves won't bounce back' or JDAMs, and sometimes HARMs. That's a heckuva way to deliver a message. ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
nscode Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Oops, sorry, thoes things you've just hit with your HARMs were just decoy emmiters cheaper than a LockOn licence. Ough, and here you are now on my 50 year old radar screen.. somebody must have cut my fax lines. Ракета пошла.. Is that your plane burning? In the $$$ vs. creative people the later always wins.. eventually Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
anivanov Posted February 1, 2006 Author Posted February 1, 2006 well, stealth has some good sides, but sooner or later it will be replaced by something another ( read better ). it will be interesting to track it"s development.
lunanera Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 how about this for looking clumsy? still I wish it had won the race instead of the F-35
GGTharos Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Oops, sorry, thoes things you've just hit with your HARMs were just decoy emmiters cheaper than a LockOn licence. Ough, and here you are now on my 50 year old radar screen.. somebody must have cut my fax lines. Ракета пошла.. Is that your plane burning? In the $$$ vs. creative people the later always wins.. eventually So the people who spent then $$$ weren't creative? Sorry, you're grasping for straws, and wishful thinking ... I do realize every opponent of the F-22 /desperately/ wishes stealth to not work and to be so easily defeated. Get over it - it works, and it works well ... and it's proven. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Recommended Posts