EOS and sun glare fail

[104th_Crunch]

While I agree with the fact that glare is over done, and bugs need to be fixed, ED do listen. See the update to the Su-33 for one of many examples.

 

Also, it is not like these bugs were put here on purpose to make sure the Eastern jets are at a disadvantage. The way software works, you fix one thing, then another breaks without you noticing. It is all complicated I am sure.

 

I hope these bugs are fixed quick, and I'm sure they are being looked at.

[kobac]

I think the sky is so brightly in the horizon level, that it sometimes impossible to read the symbols on the HUD.

[Boberro]

I have to express my disagreement with you.Almost there is no example where the ED has acknowledge the request of the comunty.Thay

have decided to change thair clients.Older and experienced players, fans of the air force to replace the with young gamers,people why are going to play enything where thay can do scrips changes,do some cheats...Thats why thay dont put effords and attention to missiles and radar, but do dynamic shadows, sun glare, unusable TWS on russian planes and a bunch of other useless things that are useless,that someone new and ignorant to get impression it is something great.So,is it seomething like in reality or not, it's totally irrelevant.Only thing that is important is that the F-15 must be better than any russian plane.It is important that russian aircraft pilots deny any possibility of success if his presence is revealed by the pilot F 15.

I'm glad now that others say that,because testers are adamant that this is just my problem and a few others, and the rest were very satisfied.

Look the forum.In the time of the 1.12b we where desscuing abouth events.Now on the forum people asking which key activates aftherburner,why i brake lending gear when i lend at bombed runway...

I think it's bad for them and will have financial losses because of that, but...

At this moment,whole comunity of the Lock on is server of the 51-st squadron.

 

You will be no pleased of DCS: Su-27S either. It will fail more often than DCS:F-15 in fight.

Can't wait to see your next complains :)

[159th_Falcon]

You will be no pleased of DCS: Su-27S either. It will fail more often than DCS:F-15 in fight.

Can't wait to see your next complains :)

 

SU-27SM

 

At least if we go by the official announcements.;)

[Boberro]

Then chances change :)

 

Su-27SM is quite new (for Russian standards only) but if we're going to have F-35 then Su-27SM wouldn't be a problem :D

[Teknetinium]

Then chances change :)

 

Su-27SM is quite new (for Russian standards only) but if we're going to have F-35 then Su-27SM wouldn't be a problem :D

 

Su-27SM is not that new, if you consider that Mig-29S used R-77 long time befor Su-27 acquired them, Russian air force just didn't have the money to get those updates that should be done around 1999. same story with Su-34 it has been around for ages but just recently entered service.

 

I would assume Su-27SM would be possible if some cooperation could be done with russian avionics developers. If it is presented right I really don't think they would miss such opportunity to make free advertisement of their avionics that can be done through simulations as DCS. When it comes to air-dynamics I would assume Su-27S/SM have more documentation then F-35.

Edited July 22, 2013 by Teknetinium

[TaliG]

Yes,exactly.

What´s the use of 6dof cocpit if you have no missiles to fight?Or sensores to find target?

What is the use of broken tws?Do you using it?How many "kills" have you made with it?(multiplayer of course)

Thats what am I talking abouth.

 

The only use for all the above was to grab some more money...

Tell me who was going to buy a downgraded FC2 just to fly MP with the hogs?

And believe me..most of the new ''wannatry'' simmers that buy FC3, go MP and ask questions like what is the best plane to fly , how do i fire, how do i find targets... what is the key for ecm and so on..

Most of them if not all, doesn't even know what tws or eos means and what or how it is used for...Why should they care if it is there, if it works and if it was implemented in previews versions? Those are the same people who prefer a 3d model update over a functionality fix.

 

I do not blame them. They are free to enjoy their time and money as they like.

I do not blame ED. they are free to choose what to produce and what not.

 

 

I blame only myself because my old-time brain was not suited for FC any more...

but I gifted my self a copy of FC3 anyway..

I grow up with LOMAC. 1.12b was the most MP fun for me..but after BS and A-10c, I think it was a mistake that I bought FC3. It brought only frustration (ok, ok, ok, and a little bit of MP air-quake fun:smilewink: ) to me...

[*Rage*]

The only use for all the above was to grab some more money...

Tell me who was going to buy a downgraded FC2 just to fly MP with the hogs?

And believe me..most of the new ''wannatry'' simmers that buy FC3, go MP and ask questions like what is the best plane to fly , how do i fire, how do i find targets... what is the key for ecm and so on..

Most of them if not all, doesn't even know what tws or eos means and what or how it is used for...Why should they care if it is there, if it works and if it was implemented in previews versions? Those are the same people who prefer a 3d model update over a functionality fix.

 

I do not blame them. They are free to enjoy their time and money as they like.

I do not blame ED. they are free to choose what to produce and what not.

 

 

I blame only myself because my old-time brain was not suited for FC any more...

but I gifted my self a copy of FC3 anyway..

I grow up with LOMAC. 1.12b was the most MP fun for me..but after BS and A-10c, I think it was a mistake that I bought FC3. It brought only frustration (ok, ok, ok, and a little bit of MP air-quake fun:smilewink: ) to me...

 

I disagree with this sort of elitism. You were not born able to fly and fight perfectly. Neither was anyone else. We all started out as noobs and the more noobs that fly, the more experienced a pool of players we develop and the greater success of DCS will become.

[TaliG]

I disagree with this sort of elitism. You were not born able to fly and fight perfectly. Neither was anyone else. We all started out as noobs and the more noobs that fly, the more experienced a pool of players we develop and the greater success of DCS will become.

 

You misunderstood me...I started as a noob with LOMAC and I am STILL a noob after 10 years with FC3. my kill/death ratio is 1:1 and sometimes even less.

My point is that my ''interest'' jumped up a ''level'', from airquake to study sims with complex systems to work with and buttons to press all the time inside the cockpit (not on the keyboard).

Thats all, and no offence to the noobs as i am one of them in airquake.

[Rhinox]

You misunderstood me...I started as a noob with LOMAC and I am STILL a noob after 10 years with FC3. my kill/death ratio is 1:1 and sometimes even less.

Taking into account you meet virtual opponents of mixed level, I'd say you are no way "noob" if you keep k/d ratio close to 1:1. And if you fly "Su-27FC3", I'd call you an ace if you have this score...

[TaliG]

Taking into account you meet virtual opponents of mixed level, I'd say you are no way "noob" if you keep k/d ratio close to 1:1. And if you fly "Su-27FC3", I'd call you an ace if you have this score...

 

I usually start with the 27 and a couple of beers :beer: , as I become more ''lazy'' :drunk:

I ride the 33, but when I am really pissed off I ride the rocket 29, just to proove that russians can ''SPAMRAM'' and run like ..(you know), too:music_whistling:

I never fly the 15 and will never fly it... for me its like dumping DCS for FSX:rolleyes:

 

But anyway, I consider myself a noob on the above situations..

1-1 MP combat is a different thing though :smilewink:

[blkspade]

I usually start with the 27 and a couple of beers :beer: , as I become more ''lazy'' :drunk:

I ride the 33, but when I am really pissed off I ride the rocket 29, just to proove that russians can ''SPAMRAM'' and run like ..(you know), too:music_whistling:

I never fly the 15 and will never fly it... for me its like dumping DCS for FSX:rolleyes:

 

But anyway, I consider myself a noob on the above situations..

1-1 MP combat is a different thing though :smilewink:

 

The R-27ET is more threatening than the AIM120 realistically, and can be spammed just the same. Even worse when they are spammed post 'death', as the inexperienced will just assume they've killed the bandit and not check to see if they are still launching. There is a chance to defeat the 120 in the same situation because there is a warning even if you fail to spot the launch. The F-15 as well as it is designed to be excellent at BVR, still needs to be in capable hands. I'm personally not interested in flying the Russian jets, but I have mostly the mindset being the best F-15 pilot I can be. And only a little bit of "America, F yeah"...

[TaliG]

The R-27ET is more threatening than the AIM120 realistically, and can be spammed just the same. Even worse when they are spammed post 'death', as the inexperienced will just assume they've killed the bandit and not check to see if they are still launching. There is a chance to defeat the 120 in the same situation because there is a warning even if you fail to spot the launch. The F-15 as well as it is designed to be excellent at BVR, still needs to be in capable hands. I'm personally not interested in flying the Russian jets, but I have mostly the mindset being the best F-15 pilot I can be. And only a little bit of "America, F yeah"...

 

I ll tell you a secret... (anyway experienced 15 riders know about it)

Between your chaff dispenses..be litle more generous and throw some flares aswell, and thats it my friend..ET goes home.. (wrong way though) :thumbup:

[Teknetinium]

so is EOTS working now?

 

 

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

[Fishbreath]

It's a shame. During the run-up to 1.2.6, Wags did mention that one of the things they're working on is separate code for IRST and radar; I'd expect some fixes/improvements at that point. Hopefully.

[karambiatos]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

putting it lightly

[SESova]

It's a shame. During the run-up to 1.2.6, Wags did mention that one of the things they're working on is separate code for IRST and radar; I'd expect some fixes/improvements at that point. Hopefully.

 

He wrote on the forum abouth that.Thay will do it,but thay need long,long,long time for that.If thay do it...

[*Rage*]

HDR Warm seems to exacerbate the unreadable hud glare issue. Any news of acknowledgement or a fix?