Leaderboard

I think claiming that ED is closing the door in people's faces is pretty darned arrogant too. They have a plan, and right now, they are catering to the LARGE helicopter community which hasn't had a new hard core sim for a LONG time. And if you can claim they are arrogant, how arrogant are you to presume on knowing more than they about what the market is like, and telling them how to run their business? People paid $40 or whatever for LO, two years ago. They got patches, they still will likely get another, but LO is over and done with. Live with it. Why not go complain about EA dropping Jane's or something now? Maybe you should start your own company and cater to the A2A crowd then. I like A2A very much myself, but I don't feel like ED owes me another A2A sim. I -want- them to produce one, 'cause I want my hi-fi F-15C, but thinking that they OWE it to anyone? Rather huge, inflated sense of self-entitlement there. Why don't you go see what $100 will buy you in the industry? (I'll make it easy for you: On the cheap side, you might get 60 min of phone support - we're pretty lucky the gaming industry hasn't adopted that ... )

Since there is no LO online subforum in the English speaking community forum, I'm posting here. You can find our server statistics here : http://80.250.162.148/stats/Default.aspx?dir=1&subdir=5 You can find our server rules here : http://80.250.162.148/stats/Default.aspx?dir=10 Failure to comply with these rules 1 time will lead to a 1 week ban, 2 times – 1 month ban, 3 times – permanent ban. Although it isn’t mentioned in the rules, being on the server as spectator is not welcomed and it can be a reason for a ban for spying. translation by © =RAF=Shemit

and check out my cabrio. :D

Even when compared to the other Lock On aircraft, it seems like an appropriate candidate: - can bomb bridges and other targets that the Ka-50 can't handle on its own - can be used on both teams for multiplayer competition (Russia & Georgia) - AFM and damage model already finished - property rights exclusive to ED, not owned by UbiSoft - has the flying range to actually use the new airbases added to the DCS map - has an RWR/ARMs, allowing SAMs/AAA to appear in missions without overwhelming players The only thing it seems to lack is a 6DOF cockpit - does ED really think that makes it worth getting rid of multiplayer competition altogether? That would imply that non-TrackIR4 users are not in the target market for the DCS product line. Besides, recent screenshots have shown how quickly the AH-64A and A-10A cockpits could be thrown together - long before the Ka-50 is finished itself. The cockpit designers obviously have too much time on their hands if they're that far ahead. What's the issue? -SK

reb inbound, if i see pictures post by Torwak, i'm sure they will be great !!!:thumbup: grtz...Ross...

вот оно! то, чего нам всем так не хватало :)

Однако... А как ты отличаешь левых от нелевых. Нелевые - это те, которых ты знаешь что ли:)? Попытки сделать войну не здесь, а в другом разделе. Жестоко :). И как ты себе представляешь выбор командира? Все летают, себе, приходят, уходят и каждые десять минут сервер становится на паузу и автоматический ротатор говорит: "А сейчас голосуем за командиров". Так что ли?

Ooh, big words. I suppose someone would be getting their money at the end of "forever?" How will Black Shark be "good" for rotorheads without a dynamic campaign? It's not like you can stick them all in Hyperlobby and let them fight each other the way we're treated - they depend on a DC even more than we do. The starvation will continue. -SK

Ctrl+E+E. Откроются все двери!

Может пока для "внутреннего" использования наладим? А потом уже и на международный рынок выйдем с продуктом, с буквой -М- в конце! :)

You know what...........you may just be right! Proof :D

Strangely enough, Tom Cruise could still fit in it! :D

yes :) its called Chroma key or something like that but yes.