Leaderboard

hey ironmike, i posted about inviting international squads for out birthday event, but i am not in charge of the event or a member of the hq. the basic answer was, no we do not want that, but i do not really understand that, cause i alos pointed out, that we should invite the 51st too, cause we flew a couple of times against them in squadwars. well i talk to my ingman if he want to set up such campaign again, like we did before but for more then ust our squad internal. if so, i will invite specific squads for the event, but when we make such event, for sure there will be more flights, just have to think about the timing and how many flights we want to make in which timeperiod etc etc. it is a ton of workload, and yes i am a bit sad about the fact, that they do not want other squad from other countries right now, cuase the german community has only a few active squads left, which there are, 33rd, 31st, vjg71, vjs161, and the jabog 32nd. that are squads i knowof, which fly online, but most of them chrinked in sise, like we did too. it sometime seem that the golden days are over, but who knows. i really would love to make a big event with more then just one day, more something that bulits up in some way, judged by the system of my wingamn and me developed, but who knows. i just talked to my wingman and he wants to wit for fc3, cause this would give us more possibilities, his answer to my idea, so well it looks like that there will come up something with fc3, which maybe will be mindblowing :-) @mav: well whatever man. if you think i only use wiki, thats none of my serious resource, but the once available for puplic ;-) and for you beeing a hero, shooting down reallife IPs, well, good for you, but we have a real f4 pilot who will transition to the eurofighter, or maybe allready did, in our squad, and guess what, in bfm, i was able to kick his butt gunzo 8:3, in bfm gunz and IR we were equal, and in bvr, he learned something from me and i learned something from him, so this is how it should be. to learn from each other, not just say, ohh i am an ace who even shots down real IP in virtual skies. never forget, in RL they have also g forces, which we will not sustian that well like they do, so we would probably kill ourselfs faster then they could say "tally ho bandit1" lets keep this constructive and for ironmike, i see that with the tactics, what you mentioned, thats why i did not say to much about it :-) but when you are overrun, then you should have an open gap when all thier planes are rtb. i could see that overrun at the first engagement, it was huge, but well with this force, the red side should have managed better, in my oppinion, but well for the missile spamming, both sides did that, not only blue, thats for sure :-), only diffrence is 70 missiles, which is at a near total of 800 missiles shot in an event, less then 10%, which shows me, that both sides spammed :-) so this is not just pointed to the blue side.

This is a good video, shows rain coverage on canopy prior to takeoff (the rest of the flight is awesome too!) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1fc_1324038018

Блин ,то что читеры ползают как блохи по серверам и долбят так как в честном бою выиграть не могут .... обид не у кого нет, а тут 800тый пару тройку раз понеопытности накосячил ... расплакались.

This is not the first time I have seen people running around looking for the an old version. Doesn't anybody make copies of stuff. Blank DVDs are cheap, disk drives are cheap. It takes a couple of minutes to make a copy. I have every full version and every patch since the release last spring and I have never actually used any of them. But if I want/need them they are there. :music_whistling:

1. это что такое? 2. модов нет; 3. куда катить? 4. не могу, там товарищи.

BTW: For everyone interested visit http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/ Full USAF crash reports. I had to use a US-proxy server to access the site

ждемс.

Легко. Пан Х имеет лицензию и 10 активаций. Пан Х деактивирует свою игру и передаёт ключ мне. Я активирую игру, провожу облёт, выдаю свои рекомендации и деактивирую игру. Пан Х активирует игру. Если такая схема вызывает нарекание у маркетологов команды DCS, то я покупаю у пана Х его лицензию, а потом пан Х покупает её же у меня. Ты умничка - ухватил самую суть Читая это: я конечно представляю разницу между гидродемферами и торсионами. И если в ЧА-1 лопасти моделировались как гидродемпфированные, а в ЧА-2 смоделированы более жёсткие торсионы, то моя печаль удваивается, из-за того, что в ЧА-1 моделирование было принципиально не верное, а в ЧА-2 моделирование имеет принципиальные ошибки. Размышляя о рекомендациях, которые я могу дать уважаемым специалистам по динамике команды DCS, я вспоминаю нашу встречу с представителями фирмы Камова, которая состоялась, дай Бог памяти, в 90 году, в Германии (там по моему даже Михеев был, но наверное не буду утверждать). Так вот там, они не без гордости говорили, что на первых экземплярах В-80 у лётчика не было ограничений по работе рулями. Однако, из-за того, что с такой высокой втулкой вертолёт не отвечал стандартам перевозки по ЖД, МО потребовало привести общую высоту вертолёта в соответствие этим стандартам. В результате команде Камовского КБ пришлось вводить ограничения по пилотажным характеристикам. Далее. Продолжая анализировать источник возможных рекомендаций, обращусь к видео Eponsky_botа. Там наглядно показано ряд несоответствий поведения модели реальному вертолёту. При перехлёсте лопастей, на редуктор действуют такие силы, которые за доли секунды разрушают его со всеми вытекающими последствиями. В моей практике полётов на Ми-8 был случай отслоения участка элемента обогрева лопасти. Произошло это с уважаемым Е.А.З. (он ныне в Афгане, посему разрешения на публикацию полного его имени получить от него не могу). Так вот лопасть у него выпадала на полметра. И только благодаря своему опыту и хладнокровию, он довёл машину на базовый аэродром и посадил её. По сообщению пассажиров вибрация в салоне достигала 15-20 см\с. И это только из-за отслоения 30 см элемента обогрева. Но если от лопасти уходит хотя бы 5% массы, полное разрушение несущей системы вкупе с редуктором неминуемо. Далее. Просматривая видео Eponsky_botа про реакцию лопастей на управляющие движения РППУ при ветре, увидел явное не соответствие поведению "тюльпана" реальности. Если ручка даётся от себя, то в азимуте 0 лопасти должны опускаться, а в азимуте 180 напротив, подниматься. В модели мы наблюдаем полное поднятие "тюльпана" вне зависимости от азимута. На сём, заканчивая, констатирую: бригаде динамиков DCS предстоит значительная работа по доведению FM Ка-50 до реального образца. После облёта модели выдам более конкретные рекомендации. С уважением.

Вот)

Kuky, perhaps you didn't see this: "unfortunately the only way to access the internet is with wireless broadband" :P You can get things eminently playable with wireless anyhow though, as long as the provider and location is up to the task. 70-90 isn't as good as you can get on cable, DSL or fiber, but sometimes those simply are not an option. If the copper sucks (or is non-existant), then wireless is all you've got.

А как вообще работает репутация? Или киньте ссылку, или тут опишите как плюсовать. А то хочешь добавить кому -то плюсик, а не получается.

I would like to see the extra layer of texture on terrains for the forests like in FC1.12. Because from low and medium height the terrain looks terrible with noise texture repeating itself.

Красота.

--> 7miss.zip

Besides the fact that you are wrong? No. Out of all the people, I would expect you to never use a phrase such as "by extension", not to mention in that same sentance you, yourself, say different aircraft have different FCS. Anyways, the SU-27S allows for assymetric loadouts. The disbalance limit is 450kg. Even different type of missiles can be deployed on symmetric stations. For example: R-27ER on one R-27R on the opposing.

That is a pretty long extension... don't over extend yourself.

1.1.1.1 is still not good enough,i think i will pass on this one.

I don't think ED is up to the challenge of the F-15Es avionics integration though... :D :D :D Maybe they should do an F-16 sim just to ride on the coattails of all the scrubs who are obsessed with this very unthrilling airframe. And then maybe the next sim company should come along and do the same thing, since ED's F-16 sold so well. And then when the sim industry is almost totally dead and the F-16 is long since mothballed, we can all look back and go 'Good thing we have a dozen simulations of the same stupid aircraft that has been replaced by the F-35, that all model the same avionics and do the same thing, too bad the last F-15E simulator was 1998, and this is the only fighter that still doesn't have a replacement'. Good riddance, go play Falcon 4 BMS if you love it so much, because it's 90% the exact same game that ED could deliver.

Tell them to bring it man :thumbup:

That's not even the cliffs notes. ;)

What an incredibly ignorant and arrogant statement. Even if you were a real pilot, real pilots don't talk like this. This is like pissing on the guy's grave. 228 people died and you're using it as a chance to show off your make-believe pilot "cred." I've never seen a more depressing showing from this forum, even knowing that you frequently spew BS. Oh whoop-de-friggin-doo you simulated this in A-10C? REALLY? Why don't you go write that up in a logbook! You must be ready for the real deal! Someone get this pretend computer pilot a medal! :mad: Accidents are situational. Mistakes are made in real time, under real stress, in the REAL world. Check your friggin ego and get off the computer for a few hours.

LOL A drone talking about another drone. Only at FOX news.