Leaderboard

Now that with DCS World, there will be more options to choose what you want to fly, we will see missions with more players. Will the netcode improve at level of BMS or IL2? Greetings

Yes, I do understand all of that. But I have tried making a mission with no AI, No planes in the air, no trees(yes to heard it right), changed affinity to 4, 3, 2 Cores!!, a flat dead landscape. No change in the framerate. Removed most of the buildings(low settings) and when flying very low near any town, there is performance problems even when there are no buildings at all!!. It's not just what you mention, there is something else in the code that is making the computer struggle almost all the time.

Why do you think specs are only tied to graphics? In-depth modeling of aerodynamic is very cpu intensive. Not to mention modeling the various systems and equipment + dozens of AI units (you know, things like pathfinding, are not-so trivial in a the huge enviroment of DCS). Just because you don't see all the things that tick under the hood doesn't mean they don't have their costs. The more fidelity you want, the more you have to pay in terms of required CPU power, there is no magic way around it. And sims (since the dawn of gaming) allways required all the CPU power they could get.

А вот еще!

Этот ролик видел?

I'm not sure this is something that can be designed for, ever. If ED could program something that magically enabled instant and easy cooperation between random players who really have no interest in talking to each other, every military in the world would be clobbering them with contract requests. Instead I think there's a very good reason people spend years training to do this kind of stuff in the real world, and there's no easy way around it even in a computer game. If you want to avoid the free-for-all in online play, all you need to do is join a virtual squadron or found your own with some like-minded players.

Invalid Album specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator cough

I took these a few months back flying over Georgia. Mt El´brus Coast 1 Coast 2 Coast 3 Moldovka Kutaisi....i think...

Personally I think if you go with either gigabyte or ASUS you won't be disappointed. I've had both. You cant compare mboards with different chipset versions though as each manufacturer will add something new each time e.g. Windows Bios control. I do think that ASUS has created something a little special with the z77 chipset this time around though. Any particular reason you don't want to go with ivy bridge? Ppl keep going on about the heat as if it's a massive stumbling block. The main reason ppl are complaining is because they EXPECTED to clock it higher than sandy bridge. You should still be able to clock ivy to about 4.5 - 4.6 which is similar to clocks speeds on air for sandy. Also overclocking ivy is a LOT simpler too. Have you read this? Always thought this was a good tech website. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-3770k-overclock-geforce-gtx-680,3212.html You know that mboard has 8 channel realtek onboard sound already right? Also if you,plan on overclocking (which I am sure you are) then you have a good custom cooler that is compatible with board and CPU?

http://files.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/131074/ http://files.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/131241/

I do now see a lua file with a title "Default Coalitions" i think i understand now that is what you mean Kamov, sorry in my previous above , i didnt know what you meant, thx again. My only problem is trying to figure what number i give and what matching number to assign it. regards Strut

Great to hear you'll finally be getting an upgrade Cali - it's about time :) I recently switched from buying Gigabyte boards to an Asus board. The Asus is noticeably superior enough I won't be going back. The BIOS is much better and friendlier for overclocking, and coupled with a few reset buttons on the Asus board to help out if you get a setting wrong (like accidentally disabling the USB ports, doop!) then I'd say the Asus is the clear winner. A 2500k is also a good choice. There isn't much point at getting anything more expensive at this stage. Do try and get as fast RAM as you can, between 1600 MHz and 2133 MHz seems to be a good price point. I wouldn't get less than 8 GB these days - especially as you'll want to run a 64-bit operating system. Don't buy a video card with less than 2 GB Video RAM (VRAM) on it. If doesn't matter how fast the rest of your system is, if you video card starts swapping excessively between RAM and VRAM then you will notice it. All that VRAM is needed if you crank texture quality, anti-aliasing, anisotropic filtering, high dynamic range (HDR) rendering, or Screen Space Ambient Occlusion (SSAO) up. You're gonna love these sims with your new rig.

Oh dear, I should have checked your history before I posted. Seems you have been having performance problems for more than two years on that hardware. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=991537&postcount=410 Performance problems in Lock On you say? Will try the demo and then buy it you say? Considering the history of issues here and the help and advice previously you've been given, I'm wondering why you are posting? PS Thats a rhetorical question.

Pretty simple :) Copy your f-15c folder from: FC2/Config/Input/Aircraft/f-15c To folder: C:/users/username/saved games/dcs/config/input Then Rename it: f-15e

And now he's our Ambassador to the US...Go figure, as the yanks would say! In terms of the Radar used in the F/A-18E (current talking point, now it would seem) I'm guessing the APG-73 would be modeled, as opposed to the 79, which AFAIK, is still classified tech.

I can sympathise - but basically this was forced upon the sim, due to the amount of problems people were having with UAC. Nate

DCS становится брэндом. Генералы предвкушают глобальной войны.:)