Rex

yeah, I removed them all from the mods directory manually. Oddly, the Hornet is behaving normally in Sinai, it's just goofed in certain maps. Anyway, it is repairing for good measure and then I'll test. Added: Yea, no mods now, ran repair, but still same problem. Did you get the Mig-29 today by any chance? That's the only other thing that has changed.

Fair enough but in the past six years I've never once had to do that before. The mods are in the Saved Games directory. Anyway, will try. The Hornet is not even showing up as human-flyable.

I just started flying the Mig-29 today, but since doing so, I notice that in regions like Caucasus and Nevada, I can no longer load the AIM-9X missiles onto the Hornet, and that F/A-18C only has like 4 liveries available (instead of the usual 30 or so). Something got corrupted somewhere. I'm not sure if it's related to the new DCS version, new plane (Mig-29), or something else. I do have a couple of mods running, Civil Aviation and the F-22, but it all worked before the latest updated and new plane, and has worked for 3+ years. Historic mode is NOT enabled, and either way the dates are set to 2025, "ALL" is set instead of "COMBAT", there are no payload restrictions, etc ... I already ran through most of the low-hanging fruit.

This is my favorite map in DCS. And it's just getting better. Thanks, guys, your hard work on this is very much appreciated, not to mention, greatly enjoyed. To this day I spend hours just flying around this map in SP because I love the atmosphere. I always find something new and interesting, and even educational. I didn't even know Mont St. Michael existed until I flew over it in DCS! I've since researched and read all about it. Ditto places like Jersey and Isle of Wright. And there is this country just north of France called "England"! I've since learned that it's famous for being a pretty country with godawful food and people who can't properly speak the very language they invented. Who knew??!! Okay, okay, I kid about England. Sort of. Anyway, London to Paris is 200 miles of content on one historical sim map, which is just outstanding. I love flying past the Eiffel Tower, Buckingham Palace, Big Ben, the Arc Du Triumph, London Bridge, the Louvre, and then when I'm done admiring them ... blowing them to kingdom come. It's improved my enjoyment of DCS immensely. Thank you so much!

Got it, I missed that, thank you! P.S. Man, check out those blowers when going from MIL to AB, that's beautiful

I'm getting a "check gear" voice warning every 45 seconds or so. My gear is up, though. It's controlled with my pinkie switch and I am up at 35K and still getting it. Anyone else getting the warning? Resolved: My bad, I had the flaps down.

Loving the Mig-29 so far! Thank you so much for making it, I've only gotten a couple of hours in so far, but they have been an awesome couple of hours. Very well done! Question: Using auto-pilot gives me a back-and-forth oscillation, even when using the damper. Is this a trait of the plane, or am I not using Autopilot correctly? Edited to Add: Just noticed it does not appear to oscillate quite as much at high altitude.

Lessay & Stoney Cross are 6,000ft, I think.

That's what she said.

Interesting, I've been trying to make a Jericho mission myself, and so far this is my best effort creating a stand-in for Amiens Prison. See the wall and machine gun bunker at the bottom? That's what makes it a prison! Eh, eh, genius, amirite? Now, I know what you're thinking, "damn, I wanted realistic but that's a little TOO realistic ... if any WW2 veterans see it, their PTSD may get triggered" ... but I decided to take the risk, and go all-in on immersiveness. If you look real hard, you might just spot George and Weezy Jefferson on the top floor, in their dee-lux apartment, in the sky high-high. Apparently, they were both spies for the frogs. Who knew? Except for Florence, that is. Who do you think turned them in? See? With ingenuity like this, I hardly think Ugra needs to trouble themselves with making an Amiens Prison. I mean, I highly-doubt a better one could be made.

I'm trying to make a mission, and in part of it, the Allies try to cross the Seine just south of Le Havre in Higgins Boats. Problem is, it won't work because the estuary is so shallow ... too shallow even for Higgins Boats. The thing is, I thought those boats only had a draft of like, 4 feet? I know nothing of the water navigation in that area, Is the Sienne estuary really that shallow?

I was trying to find the compass rose in the ME as well, which is how I found this thread. Add me to the people who would like to have it in ME if possible. All I would need to do to get multiple ingress/egress headings in a glance is place the compass over a specific base, which would be super-helpful.

Thanks, I hope that's true ... but ... it's been coming since 2015. Prince was still alive when 2.0 was announced, The first Trump administration hadn't happened yet. Kanye West was still quasi-sane when 2.0 was announced. I'm a software developer, and I know good software takes time. But unless it's been cancelled, 10 years is probably unanticipated by most. Not that the dev owes us anything, but it does toy with our excitement a bit. I'm really happy that it's not dead. But unless I missed it, which is possible, I haven't seen anything that looks like an estimated release date, so it's likely not imminent. I guess it gets here when it gets here if it gets here. I hope it does, and if not, well, there's always my kids. And their kids. And their kids. And th ... well you get the point. Somebody, sometime should be pretty excited. I hope the dev charges 1.x users for it too. Dude's going to go broke grandfathering us all in. 2.0 sounds like a ton of work, and he completely deserves to be paid for his work. I've been using the excellent 1.x.x for damn near a decade. I got my money's worth several times over. I use Tacview for DCS and other programs too (like CMANO). He doesn't owe me (or any of us) anything, IMHO. Not to mention, if you told me I had to give my product away, it would take me 10 years to complete it too. Assuming I ever did.

This thread was posted over 10 years ago, so I assume 2.0 is no longer happening, but I figured I'd ask. I love Tacview and was looking forward to it. I'd pay for 2.0, no problem. I've been using 1.x for so long. I've also never necro'ed a 10 year-old thread before, and I want to impress the ladies by telling them that I did so.

I called my bank, and they said the don't see any declined transactions whatsoever. They're saying the decline is on Saferpays end. I don't know if that is true or not.

This is happening to me too. I can't buy the Corsair. I'm using the Saferpay option, not PayPal. It says "Blocked for Security Reasons". Two cards from two separate banks. This after spending $1,000+ on modules over the years. I don't have problems placing orders in general. I don't get it.

Understood. I guess it is what it is.

I am a BF-109 DCS pilot, and I have some tips for the Spitfire that I guarantee will get more kills. These are tips that very few people are aware of, and if you use them, everyone will think you are some kind of "super pilot". 1. Cut the throttle while turning. Most people enter turns way too fast, and they keep the throttle maxed while turning. Wrong, Wong, wrong. Power makes your turning circle wider, what you need to do is get right above stall speed, and then PULL HARD with the power at idle. The lower you execute this maneuver the better. The spit turns best at 50'-100' AGL. 2. Need to catch an enemy plane? Full flaps! I know it's sightly counter-intuitive but a Spitfire exhibits behavior called "flap draft". You know how race cars go faster when they are directly behind another car? Same concept. The flaps form a pocket of air directly under the plane, which significantly reduces drag and helps get the plane moving. 3. Inverted Flight = Better Performance. The Merlin engine is mounted upside-down in the fuselage due to space constraints. Inverted flight allows you to get the most power from the engine. 4. Adjust sights. There is a well known flaw in the Spitfire that causes the sites to be calibrated way too far in front of the target during deflection shots. To compensate, what you need to do is sight just behind the plane when firing. Missing will be a thing of the past. This is especially true when targeting the BF-109. For some reason, the Spitfire gunsight leads the BF-109 about twice as much another planes. Rumors are that a German spy infiltrated the Supermarine plant and altered the blueprints. Now that you, know, however, always aim behind the plane your trying to shoot. 5. Landing gear ... not just for landing! Similar to flap draft, there is another phenomenon known as "gear effect". Have you ever heard of "ground effect", where a plane experiences less drag near the ground (look it up!). Well, Spitfire gear is mounted just aft of the circumferential point, which basically puts you in ground effect regardless of altitude. When you need maximum performance, and you need it NOW, drop the landing gear, and hang on tight! Have you ever ridden a slingshot projectile? Well you have now! Look, we've all been there. Dogfighting can be challenging, but with these tips, you'll be racking up kills in no time. People will be saying "Hey, who is that? Is that Alphagamer1981 or is that Eric Hartman. P.S. I know you're a Spit pilot, so sorry to use a German pilot in that last example. I tried to think of an Allied pilot to use as an example, but while there are over 100 German pilots with 100 kills or more, the top Allied pilot only had 40 kills, and the third best was already in the 20s, so yeah, so when it comes to real aces, there is only one country to choose from. It's not that the Allied pilots weren't as good ... they totally were ... they just took more vacations or something. Honestly, I lost track of all the excuses, maybe the ground crew kept forgetting to put ammo in the planes, but they were totally every bit as good. Now if you go by kill CLAIMS, whoo boy, the Allies literally shot down every man, woman, and child on the planet .. five times over. Now that is a feat!

Indeed, there certainly is a dizzying array of reasons for an Internet connection to be unstable. That was kind of my point. Most of those reasons are not the fault of the customer, but the customer gets punished regardless. Ergo, it's customer-hostile, and an objectionable practice. One usually relegated to megalocorps for whom customer-hostility is a source of pride. Can we do anything about it? Besides complain about it, and registering our objections, I guess not. It's certainly a legitimate thing to complain about, though. And at least for me, it's out of character. Were you to look, I think you would find that my account is filled with nothing but glowing praise for DCS (and the odd admonition for profanity), and I think this is the only thing I've ever complained about. So it's not like I run screaming to the forums every time I find a bug. And your point is taken about offline mode, and I agree that this is a fantastic solution for the psychic among us. Were I psychic, I would absolutely avail myself of it, and I think this would be a reasonable solution. Alas, somewhere along the line, I lost that ability. I think my mother dropped me on my head or something. If one of you could give me a heads up before it goes down, however, I would be much obliged.

I just created an AI vs AI mission, BF109 vs Spit ... 109 on Ace, Spit on Rookies (just to give the Luftwaffe a chance). I watched the Spitfire climb at 20 degrees, starting at 133 knots. It picked up speed to about 139 knots, nosed up to about 30 degrees, and eventually came back down to 133 knots and stayed at 30 degrees nose-up. Never did it drop below 133 knots. It climbed this way for about 90 seconds until it caught the 109 (yes, caught the 109 in a climb). Never stalled, never even came close. Multiple lead suppositories. Poor 109 never stood a chance. Funeral was closed casket. AI Spitfire has a T/W ratio that modern jets would envy. For grins I created a F/A-18C vs Spitfire mission, both on Ace, guns only. This mission ran much longer, and the Hornet came oh-so-close several times, but the Spit's tight turns caused the shells to miss by two or three feet, and the Spitfire eventually prevailed here too, plunking the pilot through the canopy for an insta-kill. The AI Spitfire is the Chuck Norris of DCS.

Please accept my apology. That was not my intent. The whole thing just irks me, and I guess I took it out on the first post that struck me. I am an ashole. I didn't mean to direct ire your way. It was mis-directed. Your feedback certainly was helpful. I'm sorry.

Sure, maybe. Let's say that it is. Why is that relevant? If that is indeed the case, it is a near-certainty that he does not want his connection to be less steady, and probably did nothing to cause it. He may live in an area of the world where that's the best he can get. Or maybe he lives where his ISP is a monopoly and therefore his service is @#$@. I heard about this one obscure little country where this sometimes happens, but I forget the name of it. The Untied Status of Abracadabra or something like that. Anyway, his unstable Internet is likely not his fault. Why hold his hobby hostage over something third-world governments or widespread corporate en<profanity>tifcation? (seriously guys, you're doing substring searches for magic words now?). He paid for his modules the same as the rest of us, does he deserve to enjoy them less because he didn't have the good sense to be born to parents in a geographic area with more stable internet? Remember, he isn't playing multiplayer, in which case, sure, he'd be out of luck due to technical regions beyond his and ED's control. No, he's CREATING A MiSSION, a decidedly single-player, "offline". Good news, the unstable connection doesn't really matter in this case. Unless, due to purely selfish reasons, someone decides to makes it matter. Kicking legitimate, paid-up users out of their hobby likely won't curb piracy. It may very well increase it. How many times will someone get locked out before deciding to seek a way around it? Humans are ingenious creatures, and more often than now, they find a way. Punishing your most loyal, profitable users has become businesses knee-jerk default way of dealing with the "bad behavior" of others, but companies like EA get away with it due to pure market dominance across numerous titles. DCS is more of a niche market, and in niche markets, things like customer loyalty and goodwill are much bigger factors in a company's success. For instance, I've always purchased modules directly from ED because I wanted then to get the 30% that otherwise would have gone to, say, Steam. I also purchase modules that I know I'll probably rarely use, purely to support the company. Do you think I've ever done anything like that for EA? Do you think I've spend a nanosecond contemplating what was best for them? So it's hugely disappointing to me that they've taken this play from the Customer Hostile Playbook. Now ANY network problem, regardless of who is at fault, becomes your problem, and removes the content you paid for from your library. At least until the problem is fixed. What about people who bought their modules before this policy was initiated? And there is not one technical reason that this person needs to be barred from making their mission. The reason they cannot is 100% an ED decision. I mean, what if you move to Internet-Connection Nirvana, get a stable connection, get three backups, hire eight super-attractive women to act as your harem and indulge your every carnal impulse (I mean, as long as we're fantasizing) and hire a team of elite security guards to stand by your routers and dispatch any and all who dare to tamper with them? Can you finish your mission now? Well, maybe. Then again, maybe not. Does anyone honestly think ED themselves will never, ever experience a network outage? What if that outage is due to a mistake or bad decision on their part? It doesn't matter! Regardless of the reason, you will get punished, and you will be relieved of the modules that you've paid hundreds to thousands of dollars to enjoy. And apparently you deserve it, because ... because ... I mean, because ... actually, I don't know, you'd have to ask ED for that rationale, but make no mistake, you clearly deserve it. Unfortunately, when it becomes apparent to a company that something like this is a bad idea, it's nearly always too late to reverse. The damage has been done. Hopefully that happens later rather than sooner, but for every person posting about their problems on this forum, there are probably 10-20 who don't use the forums, so we really don't know just how often this is happening now.

I just moved a buttload of Soviet armor from the East German border, through Fulda, and into Frankfurt, and it was hilly and congested with windy mountain roads. Not much better than the what I assume the Ardennes would have been like. There was no "gap" to speak of. Why was this considered such an easy route, to the point that everyone assumed they were going to use it?

This map is already a contender for "Best Map of All Time", IMHO. It's just fantastic! There are so many air bases, if the one you want isn't modeled, use a another base as a stand-in. I mean, they have to release it at some point and 120 bases is really a lot. I think the Fulda Gap focus probably provides for the highest number of air+ground scenarios. Oh one minor thing, Ctl+F12 isn't taking me to my train. I'm sure it was a minor consideration and rightfully so, just throwing it out there as an FYI.

I just noticed "DCS Market" in the lower right. LOL.