Moorhuhn

As I get it right the Stennis is alo coming as Super Carrier Module, right? Does anybody now when this is planned? And does anybody know what happens to the actual old Stennis, with the uncorrect size? Any chance, it is removed with one of the next patches? I know, now youre gonna say, what about the players, which didn't buy the SC. Its not fair to remove the Stennis for them, due to the fact they have none then. Youre right. But please dont forget we still have one free-to-play-carrier: the Carl Vinson. I know, now youre gonna say, but its out of support and graphics looks like Nintendo 64 graphics. Youre right. But please think about this: Its an better option to upgrade the actual free-to-play Cars Vinson with Super Carrier-like graphic, but without the SC features like deck crew, LSO and so on. Just a blanc, good looking Carl Vinson. We then get rid of something unaccurate like the Mini-Stennis and we have 6 Carriers (70 to 75) instead of just 5 (71 to 75) with 74 doubled. Please ED, go ahead with this suggestion. Remove the small unaccurate fake Stennis and update the actual Car Vinsion with besster graphic for free-to-play-use. Thanks

Any informations about the Modex of the A? Are they dynamic now on the A? Or a few skins for each livery, each with a diffrent modex number? And what about the B now, when the A is coming? Is the B getting also some more skins for each livery, that there were more numbers to choose instead of four cats flying with same board numbers in formation? This looks awful. Whats in general for the B and liverys? Are there some additions planned in the close future? Some HiViz/CAG Birds coming? Or maybe the legendary Santa Cats for Jolly Gogers and Fighting Checkmates?

Vietnam Map is needed urgently. The upcoming Forrestal would fit perfect. Also the upcoming A-6 and A-7 fit in perfectly. F-4 also annouced years ago. Then theres just need for an ugrade on the Huey (correct sizes etc.) including a tape player function like the Tomcat has. Playing songs like: Bad Moon Rising, Fortunate Sun, Long Tall Sally, The Tracks of my Tears, Ride of the Valkyries, ... I love the smell of Napalm in the morning

RAH-66 Comanche confirmed? :music_whistling:

Thanks for feedback :) That would be a good start into right direction. Is this the plan for both, A and B or just for upcoming A? Are there plans to add more liveries (maybe HiViz) to the B? Or is it possible to do a liveries contest where the community create those liveries. 4 liveries -101 through 104- per skin, of couse and add them after a quality check to the default official game? Like ED did that for the Anton?

So, where is the issue? The dynamic modex numbers will look the same as the current static one? Same size, same location like we have them now, but we can make a 202 outta a 201. The dynamic ones shoudn't have a different size or location like the current static ones. The swordsmen have three versions. To make a 101, a 102 and a 103 they needed to remove the last number for every time. Just remove them again and fill in a dynamic field. Same technic like ED does for their modules. Can't understand why this should be such a big issues When I look out my canopy to my left and right wingman and both have same modex numbers... thats trash. Not what I expect from an 80 bugs module. :megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol: The custom liveries are NO option. There were always issues on multiplayer servers. All the liveries must be default in game. Hopefully there will be an official Statement by HB if there are more delault livery coming for the B. Does this mean HB already mentioned that they are working on dynamic modex numbers?

Sorry, seems I had tomatoes on my eyes :) Doesn't look good for the analog one :( And what happens now to the analog one? On the screenshot, it looks likes it was already finished. Is it going to the trash can now? Did the Suite 4+ Versions even had the digital one? Or is it now going to be an fictional Aircraft? an UFO? :( Can't imagine why anybody would vote for an fictional aircraft for DCS. :doh: (Please correct me if there were Suite 4+ with the digital one, maybe I am wrong with this) Digital, Ficional, no Backseat-AI ... I will buy it anyway, but it seems not to be one of the best modules in my collection. Even it's the legendary Strike Eagle. Let's see what we get at the end. Stay healthy and fly safe

Yes, Kitty hawk Class is also very important. Hopefully the put all four of them as bonus to the Intruder like the four Forrestals to the Tomcat. Then we just need the Enterprise ... as Bonus to the Prowler :music_whistling: :joystick: :pilotfly: :beer: :drunk: :wub: :santa: :worthy: Let's see what the future brings ...

Yes, the existing skins for the B are great. But I am really looking forward for some more B default liveries just to make the collection biggerand have more options. It's those little details Heatblur is so great in. Hi Viz Swordsmen and Red Rippers are really famous and their missing in the collection is a big hole and not the usual Heatblur Standard. I didn't mean replacing the grey ones with ViViz, just expand the collection by adding the Hi Viz next to the grey ones. Just to have the free choise and the option to use both of them. Now we are forced to use fly the grey ones. As every sqadron has grey ones the also have Hi Viz ones. There must be a CAG. But it's not possible to simulate that for us (at the moment) for some squadrons And as much I respect the community skinners and have to admit that you are doing a great job, your custom downloads always causes issues on multiplayer (other players just seeing placeholder textures/liveries and so on). Custom download skins are no option. But what Heatblur could do, if they decide to add more B-liveries by themself, they could take some of your skins and add them to the game and the default liveries collection. Couse thats the point. They needed to be official in the game that we can use them without any problems. Let's see if there will be a statement from Heatblur, regarding the possibility to add some more default liveries to the B. If their answer will be "no" we could ask them kindly to add round about five community skins ( we as community choose the best ones) to the game and the livries collection after a quality check. Of course just reallistic liveris, no fictional ones. With this option there will be not much work for Heatblur, just add them to the softwarepackage and roll them out with next update. Round about five to ten more and everything is great. The other issue with the liveries are the static board numbers. The master livery must be extend by dynamic/changeable boardnumbers/modex. Stay healthy and fly safe

Do you mean for the B? There are some grey ones with no colorful counter-part. Swordsmen, Red Rippers,... Are there any Infos from Heatblur if there are more default liveries for the B. Date doesn't matter for the moment. Just to know if there are coming some more in future or if the liveries collection is finished for the B.

But if you, put both A and B full complete Block numbers to one module it could looks very confusingly for one single icon. But yes, it's uniformly to the other modules. But I would still prefer a more short-on-point module-name like "F-14A/B". "F-14" is too short in my opinion. But let's see how Heatblur solve this one when they get there.

Good Evening, under the module icon of the Anton is still visible the "EA" label. Will this one be removed? Or is it back in EA, due to the fact something has to be forgotten about the Anton? If not, please remove the "EA" label under the icon. Thank you very much for feedback.

I bet the VF-84 and 31 are coming with the A version. Both are legendary liveries and both are a must for the default liveries collection. But there are so many good (HiViz) liveries for the B model which aren't included in the game. Does anybody have any info if there are more liveries planned on the to-do-list for the B? Or is the B-Version finished in case of liveries? Just wanted to know I we can look forward to more things to come or if the default liveries collection for the B is complete. Just a little info ... Anticipation is the greatest joy Thanks for feedback :pilotfly:

I hope that you are right with you thing. A6 is needed so much. And the trailer for the AI looks so good. So much detail in this aircraft. If it's not coming out as an flyable module, just as AI for placing it on a carrier, it is wasted. There was so much detail. It really looks amazing. Heatblur did an awesome job on it. It's a crime to not release it as a module. Man, put it into EA-pre-order sale for 100 bugs, I'll buy it any day, any weather, ANYTIME, BABY! :wub: Is there a source for that info? The Saratoga is needed urgently

Thanks for feedback. Really exited what the final wallpaper will look like. :joystick:

Thank you very much for feedback. I agree, one Icon is the best way to go if its renamed to "F-14" or "F-14A+/B". If the community can vote between both, I would vote for "F-14A+/B" due to the fact all DCS modules have specific Version labels under their Module Icon name. But in the end of the day its up to you to choose between both "F-14" or "F-14A+/B". Lets see what it will be at the end. Thanks again. Nice to hear that you'll had this point on your to-do-list. Greetings

Please the analog one ... What is the actual status? More votes for analog or more votes for digital?

Good Evening together, the Wallpaper of our F-14 shows the D Version, but we only having the A and B. Is this wallpaper just a placeholder for an upcoming A or B version wallpaper? Maybe more as gamegraphic style instead of the actual reallistic photo we have now. Any infos from Heatblur? Greetings and fly safe :pilotfly: :joystick:

Hey, did anybody know if we get more default liveries for the B during the EA? Custom Community Skins are NO option, cause there always issue on multiplayer server. Very important that there are more default ones to come? Mabys some HiViz ones for example the Red Rippers, Swordsmen, and so on. Also like to see the Jolly Jogers Christmas Version. I know, I know, there are very cool and very good custom community skins. But as I said there are always issues on multiplayer. The liveries must be official and default in the game. Thanks for feedback. Greetings and fly safe :joystick: :pilotfly:

Hey, I was just wondering, if there will be a seperat module icon for the A-Tomcat? It make sense, to bind both into one single icon, but the Icon we already have says "F-14B". So maybe we get a second Icon in our module bar? Thank you very much for feedback. Stay healthy & fly safe :pilotfly: :joystick:

Hey, I am looking for the Virpil WarBRD Base. If you have one to sell please contact me. Greetings from Germany :)

Very very good... we need this skin competition also for Hornet and Falcon. But same quality standard as the actual default skins... changable boardnumbers and so on.

Are there more liveries released during the EA? We need more official default skins. custom community skins are always a problem in multiplayer server and NO option in my opinion. More official default skins need to come :pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly:

Yes Tornado important as well. By looking in your signature seeing an important one too: The legendary Starfighter. Also very important. But I hope Heatblur will go on first with the A-6. The way they sculpted the Grumman instumants are truely awesome. They should go on with this style of instuments, because they did is so brilliant. A-6 will be a Homerun ih Heatblur do it. The Panavia interior and instruments which will be also in the Tornado are not done by any 3rd Party yet. There is no binding to Heatblur. It could be done by any developer. The other way, the A-6 done by an different developer could be a flop. You have a high standard of sculpted Grumman instruments. In case the art and graphics look different to the Tomcat it could make the A-6 feel wrong. Grumman Aircrafts shoud be done all by Heatblur now. To make them look as the came all out of one "factory". Hopefully the Tornado come by an different rd Party developer right next to Heatburs A-6. Another reason is Heatblur is dropping an a-6 AI. It's on the Hand that they could do it as a complete module. Last Reason is the Release of the Super Carrier and the upcoming Forrestal. Theres a Hype for naval carrier based aircrafts. How awesom it would be to land in multiplayer with a freund next to you with an INtruder on the Forrestal ... at night A-6 would fit there in perfectly. A-6 is a MUST. PLEASE ANNOUNCE THE A-6 SOON :pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly: Then remove it from the Bucket-List for the E-2B Hawkeye. But thats future music... first they should go on with the A-6 followed by the the EA-6 :wub: Love Heatblur Simulations aka. Grumman Simulations :wub:

I am going with the Jak-9. But we defenetly need a Zero and P-40. ... a Pearl Harbor 1941 Map... and WW2 Assets Pack Update with USS Arizona and so on ... For the Zero a japanese aircraft carrier. Landing and starting with a warbird from carrier... awesome ... ... a WW2 Supercarrier module with Akagi, Kaga, Sōryū, Hiryū, Shōkaku, and Zuikaku and some US Carriers of course. In my opinion more priority then Jak-9. But Jak-9 also priority of course. Stay healthy & fly safe