RIPTIDE

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=51693

Everyone knows though that there is the FC2.0 'Mission Complication Level Server Participation Inverse Law.' :D Basically, the more teamwork you require and actual thinking and strategy involved in making your side win, the less participation in the server (and by extension, the more nOOb whines.) And that's how SAD it is. The best (or most pathetic) example I can think of was when the 104th used to run Tygers' Op. Rebellion. The mission itself was fantastic. However to greatly increase anyone side to get the job done, a set of things had to be done with co-ordination from at least 2 flights at any given time. Few if ANY ever even bothered. The worst was that there was a clear marked area called the 'Bermuda Triangle' filled with manpads. And I distinctly remember the same A-10A's time and time again taking off and flying through it at <3k AGL, getting hit by MANPADS. Respawn. Get killed again. Same with the fighters. It was a relatively small area and they persistently flew through it, grass cutting. And then of course the whining... 'waaah... too many manpads.... waaaah this sux' and everyone trying to vote the mission out. What happened in the end? The 104th removed it from the server rotate due to unpopularity. It was in that moment that the character of your average MP pool of players became very clear to me: A bunch of brain dead Muppets. There, I had my rant.

No.

Russia vs America /fight.

Same thing happened when FC2.0 came out. Names just disappeared and new ones appeared. LOL I've pretty much established for myself that many pilots were simply looking at the dot in the sky. When FC2.0 came they realised how sh1t they were when the dot suddenly wasn't there. Lots of whining about F-15C but if you take a look, many of the prominent F-15C pilots k/d ratio actually declined after FC2.0 release. Why? Because they were all dot chasing. ;) INdeed a lot of prominent players of all airframes decreased in performance because of no dots anymore.

Sounds like Greed. :D

^^ That is so much of a fail, it's almost a win. :)

I suppose the next question is how many of the 50 or so MiG-29S 9.13S were installed the SAU-451-06 Flight Control?

Sure, but in fairness we're talking FC not DCS. There is a lot of stuff already abbreviated and ... gaps filled in... with all due respect to the developer. My version, which might be wrong, since the USSR vanished, AFAIK about 50 were modernized to 9.13S, 10 delivered to frontline (without R-77), 10 delivered to R&D companies, and the remainder are cold stored somewhere in MiG-RSK's hangers. Or doing something else lol

This thread demonstrates the reserved nature of the posters and civilized approach. Because, I can think of other games/sims/products where the OP would be Megatrolled by the members, the Mods, Developers and the owners. :D

Integrity check. I asked for many days now for the integrity check. Email me the network.cfg file that will be used. EDIT: I got email. Thanks.

Surely some of them could pick up the phone and ask a few 'friends'. And fill in the gaps with a bit of imagination. There's plenty of gaps filled in with imagination already. C'mon Son. ;)

Thanks for the epileptic fit. :thumbup:

:megalol:

Hope he's done that Cali, 'cos this thread is over 1yr old. :D

It's ok. I already reported the bug and asked for it to be removed. Completely.

It was probably Chizh, he loves making everyone mad over there. ;) I don't know much about them, which probably isn't much less than anyone else for that matter. BTW, I think there is already a standing request for more accurate missile modelling. So, no. We haven't been careful: give us more flight modelling. Bring them then. But not PAC-3 cos that was a stupid idea. :megalol:

Nice ninja edit about the AIM-54C. Go on. Add the AIM-54C and the PAC-3. They're pretty useless for fighter targets. :megalol: I wouldn't carry them after FC3.0 Day 1 that's for sure. As for the R-77; false logic equating the reason for no TWS to R-77 = cheat. There most be another reason.

If I ever get an airplane I'll call it "Scary mary"

It's on =RF= server. :music_whistling:

Nice story there. Tell it again?

Can I have a cuddle too Pilotasso?

Chris. Use dropbox.com. Dl Application, which then makes a dedicated dropbox folder on your computer. Everything you drag into the folder will be synced immediately with your web storage. And you can right click the item in your folder on your computer to get the weblink for copy/paste, while you're waiting for it to finish syncing. Good for up to 2gig free.

Nate I'd like to report 3 bugs. MiG-29A, MiG-29G and MiG-29S. Can you remove them for FC3.0? kthxbai. :D

How "low" is low? Not speaking about you, but I think that many people fly low because of laziness., Laziness to actually get a few more 1'000 feet. Or maybe there's a subconscious comfort in been able to see the ground in the foreground when looking sideways or through the HUD. Anyway, the one sure thing about flying low is you piss through fuel very fast. Ironically it's very often the MiGs who are flying low, burning way too much fuel. That's why most of them never RTB. :D