P1KW

Hello. Thanks for the reply Nate. Changing the distance vision is not the solution. Even at 500m, if I am surrounded by trees performance drops a lot. Removing the trees is much worse, not for performance, look left to the simuador is depressing. I have two options, flying BS1, with a striking appearance, or fly BS2, a Falcon type scenario. I think the graphics engine spends too many resources to draw trees. Just would need to adjust the number of trees, not the distance. I hope some MOD appears to solve it. Greetings.

Hello. The problem is that with a sensitivity of 0% the joy works very fine and precise. But around the center of joy no more than 4 areas where the joy is anchored to the trimmer. The joy will not stay where you trimmer, he goes to the nearest area. With a sensitivity of 100% joy trimmer works with most positions, and is more accurate, but the helo control is very sharp and abrupt. Smooth curves in BS does not help. Who has control of FFB? Does the DCS simulator or Logitech? How hard is to find a final solution? Greetings.

Hello Trees penalize much of my system performance graph. What value should be changed to reduce the number of trees? How to remove the shadows of the trees? Greetings.

Hello The sensitivity of the axes X, Y of joy should be in 100%. It is the best value for positioning the trimmer FFB. Lower values ​​increase the slack, in point trimmer. It is very important not to dead zone axes, XY joy. In BS settings. After several trimmed central point accumulating error. To compensate for this 100% sensitivity, it is sufficient to slightly soften the corners of the axes in BS. For the throttle and pedal axis sensitivity value should be 0%. Greetings.

yes, 6 Vikhrs, 330 Kg 1 Kh-25, 300 Kg .. and I launch the Kh-25 first :cry: Greetings

Good. If over 6 Vikhr a pylon and a Kh-25 on the other, in flight I can not select Vikhr until launched the Ka-25. Is it so? Do I have an error? Is it a bug? Greetings.

¿? :noexpression: That lack of respect. And the X52 users? What are they? What about the joys of low cost? I do not understand. Ok. Each one chooses. What a joy savings with trimmer realistic, and pedals, I dedicate this: And for BS, not change it for any Warthog.

Is it only once? :closedeyes: Ok. I respect your opinion. In my case, I appreciate much more, a realistic use of the trimmer in helos. And that's what I recommend. :thumbup: Greetings.

Hello. If you fly in BS (trimmer), or IL2, or RoF, or CoD, (FSX, depends on aircraft), the G940 is the best option for the feedback of the FFB. The feedback improved more than any perceived improvement in precision. For A-10, LockOn2, Falcon, and reactors in general, Warthog, no doubt. If the Warthog had FFB, it would be just the perfect joy. Greetings.

Trimmer. :thumbup:

Hi. A-10C: Warthog. Ka-50: G940. Not debatable. What more do you fly? :pilotfly:

Hello. I wanted to show you this little analysis of the different options available in Eyefinity. Each rectangle represents a 1920x1080 monitor. The option of 3 stacked monitors do not show for lack of screenshots, although it seems less useful. edit: also missing the 6x2 mode, I not have screenshots. 1 camera, 3 monitors landscape. It is the most common. Good peripheral vision, but little vertical angle. In my view, does not compensate for peripheral vision in relation to poor cockpit view. 1 camera, 3 monitors portrait. Good balance, vertical and horizontal, we continue with 3 monitors and an acceptable cost. I think the best option. 1 camera, 5 monitor portrait. Visually spectacular, has good vertical and horizontal angle. Like 3x1 landscape, peripheral vision is distorted. Its main drawback, the cost, not just monitors, graphics card. And space. A good method to get divorced. 5 cameras, 5 monitors portrait. It solves the problem of distorted peripheral vision, greatly improves the field of vision, but has the disadvantage of poor performance. Greetings, I hope you find it useful. Excuse my Googlenglish. :music_whistling: edit: Add this image to compare proportions.

Hello. Excuse me if any have already posted this. When you load a flight plan in the ABRIS, in the bottom window of information, the field "TO" appears empty, without the WP name. On the map, and the WP list appears correctly. How to Fix it is to edit the flight plan, but it seems dangerous to edit during the flight. Is it a bug? Will it be corrected?

Hello. Excuse me if any have already posted this. When you load a flight plan in the ABRIS, in the bottom window of information, the field "TO" appears empty, without the WP name. On the map, and the WP list appears correctly. How to Fix it is to edit the flight plan, but it seems dangerous to edit during the flight. Is it a bug? Will it be corrected? Greetings.

Hi. I think the most important is the resolution and refresh rate. I combine 22" and 24" with a setup ATI Eyefinity. Greetings.

Hello. The size difference does not affect. is very small. May disturb the reading text strings. With a card Eyefinity, the Configuration is very simple. I recommend, portrait mode, and aligning monitors at the bottom, is better than the top due to the cockpit instruments. Lanscape mode is too wide, it is unnatural. Greetings.

I agree. 3x2 is very good. But you get the horizontal line blezels divide the cockpit view (external view) of the Instruments view. If the horizontal line blezels interferes with the external view, it becomes uncomfortable. In my experience, the main drawback of the portrait mode is that the monitors support a major shift in viewing angle, when they are horizontal. But vertex, the shift from a view should be done a minimum, as it darkens the picture. Especially in the farthest to the left. In a 3x1 portrait is not a problem, but in a 5x1 can be. Although in practice, in a 5x1, the monitors side (1 & 5) only provide peripheral vision, very important indeed. My theory, and experience, the best basic mode, is 3x1 Portrait, from this you can expand or not ... ;) electromagnetic tan ... I am :alien: :D Greetings.

Hello. I do not understand your question. Sorry, my English is googlenglish. :music_whistling: Of course. I forgot. I have not tried this setup. But 7 bezels vs 4. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=63606 post #5, not video, photo. ...5400x1920

Hello. I have a 5x1P in 6990. It is the best solution ... With 3x1L, the vertical viewing angle is too narrow. With 3x1P, the vertical viewing angle is improved, but is lacking peripheral vision. I like more than 3x1L. 5x1L is just perfect. Combines the best of both modes. The bezels do not obstruct the vision. You get used quickly. The only drawback is to read text strings. Greetings.

Hello. The frames end up being invisible. The immersion is brutal. 3x1 landscape is too narrow vertically. 3x1 portrait is a good balance. 5x1 is the perfect solution. 5x1 is also a good solution to extract (ABRIS and Shk) in full screen mode. Portrait 3x1 cab, and other monitors ABRIS and Shk. Here is a solution for problems with HD6990. Last page. http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=405&threadid=152297 Excuse my bad English. :cry: Greetings.

Excuse my laziness. I have no time. They are just labels. My G13 is only for the PVI-800. Greetings. PVI-800.zip

Hello. Sorry not to respond earlier. Template designed in Corel, print, cut, laminated, and stuck on the keys. This afternoon I upload the Corel file. Greetings.

A easy tunning for G13, sorry, the LCD ist inoperative. You have a profile with working LCD? Greetings.

Thank you Gadroc. An excellent job. Greetings.

Hello. This is my "setup"to BS, and occasionally FS. Sorry for my poor English. The triple-monitor is a 5870, Eyefinity mode, full screen. The central panel is 2 BU0836A for switches and encoders, and 1 U-HID for switches and LEDs. The LEDs work synchronized with several buttons and switches but do not receive data from the simulator. The rugged G13, married BS, and this is his new suit. Greetings.