Boogdud

I've noticed that he is off target with the gun, even when point tracked. It's regularly about 1-5m off target, especially when you're close to the target. Typically if it's far away enough the cannon spread is enough to hit the target even if he's off-aim, but close in you just see a pile of lead hitting off to the side/rear of the target.

Pro-tip: Don't fill it completely with fuel while you're learning. It's tough enough to fly on half a tank.

TC would be proud of this wallpaper. Fantastic job!

Problem goes way back, to at least September 2022. Reported, I think they even acknowledged the problem on the discord. Unfortunately nothing has been done about it for well over a year. Since the Harrier is the red headed step child right now, who knows when they'll ever fix it.

Same problem for me (and many others as well). It's been mentioned on their discord but I don't know if any official fix is in the works for it. It's been around for the last few patches at least. I think it has something to do with the smoke/fire and the new(er) FLIR modelling from ED.

Yup this is my exact experience as well, I'm not in VR though this is 2d and it's not a cpu/gpu performance issue, I'm normally running 140+fps but typically right after a run on the target when the TPOD gets masked, I get a massive frame dump (frame time as well) from 140fps down to 20-30 fps. Sometimes lasts for a good 10 seconds or so. Really great for SA as you're getting shot at... Has this issue been acknowledged by anyone? It's killing the module for me, seems like it's been going on for quite some time.

Well, I can't explain exactly why this worked, but here's what happened. After testing with different sticks and different curves for hours, I ended up looking at the collective. For some reason my collective axis had the "slider" checked (I don't remember changing it, but who knows). So I unchecked that box bringing it back to 'normal' axis and applied a small curve (I like some granularity on the collective). Once I unchecked that, suddenly the aircraft became tame as a kitten in comparison to what I was experiencing before?! Small inputs actually corrected movement unlike before where they were over-correcting every single input which cascaded into a wild pony ride every time. Level flight was a breeze (I do now see the sas in action during level flight). It was literally night and day. What's really curious is I re-selected the 'slider' setting just to double check and again the cyclic would overcorrect and any collective input seemed to throw the cyclic into fits, working against each other, maybe not quite as bad because I knew what I was looking for, but turning tha setting off for me definitely fixed it. It's at very least back to 'normal'. Extremely weird.

I did a little bit of experimenting with some old sticks I had laying around, an old CH Fighterstick as well as a TM 16000 I had laying around just to see if there was any difference in behavior from other sticks vs my VKB NXT. The difference was staggering, I could fly much easier and with much more stability on both the CH and TM, with the same curve setup and even with zero curves vs my NXT. It's like the NXT is 3x as sensitive as the others. One touch of the stick sends the apache barrel rolling or trying to kill me I'm not sure why this would be, but it's very evident. It's so severe I can get SAS Saturation warning at will just sitting on the runway by moving the stick along it's axis in any direction. All other modules seem to be unaffected. Does anyone at ED have NXT gear to test with? At first I thought the slower return to center on the nxt (from the built in dampening) might be messing up central trim position settings causing instability after trimming, which it sill may be. But it seems to me that the hall effect sensors on this model are so sensitive it really makes flying very difficult.

Has this issue been acknowledged? It is still broken. Multiples don't seem to matter, rockets fire two from one launcher rather than in pairs.

So how would this work with 'central position trimmer mode'? Wouldn't you have to release your stick (to center reset) at which point it would be pretty difficult to tell when you are reaching the ~2% breakout point. I really don't envy you guys trying to find a compromise on so many control methods, especially when none of the consumer ones are designed to work like an actual helicopter control, with the exception of maybe ffb which is a niche of a niche.

I'm on non-ffb as I mentioned previously and tried both central and instant same results on both but obviously with more 'bob' from the instant trimmer mode. Honestly the aircraft is flying like SAS is disengaged. I've only experimented with the aircraft hot (instant missions), I wonder if doing a cold start might see different results.

Well you don't need to feel alone, I'm experiencing similar things and I'm not on a ffb setup. FMC seems to just 'break wild' for me even during level trimmed flight. Almost like flying in a storm. I get the same experience in hovering as well, it may actually be worse than before the patch. Instead of holding a trimmed hover the aircraft just seems to randomly drift (while still maintaining 0 speed somehow). forgot to mention, I'm on VKB nxt evo stick and nxt omni throttle with the gnx-thq add on, as well as t-rudders.

I think you mean from 3:45 on (which honestly isn't 'rapid' it's smooth rudder action), because all the stuff you're talking about from 2 minutes on is just him applying the brakes while taxiing (spitfire uses differential brakes which shows from the outside as rudder input).

At this point it might be easier to just say "we didn't make any changes to the flight model this patch", though honestly that probably wouldn't even help.... reminds me of a phrase my grandma always used to say: Buy 'em books, and buy 'em books... all they do is eat the pages.

Spotting is one thing, try actually doing any damage to a target that is remotely close to a tree. They're like force fields.