Draken35

Any chance of adding BDU-33 or any other training bombs to the F1BE?

AWESOME! Thank you!!

Having native PAR would be awesome! But that, most likely, would be tie to the (new) ATC system

He's talking, I think, about SimShaker for Aviators Beta vs Stable

Awesome post! Thank you!

Let's see how this work: In all cases I was looking directly at the top of the tower 1.trk 2.trk 3.trk HMD Issue.miz

Ok. That assumes a cold and dark scenario and yes, you would be correct in that case it could be, easily user error... But in a hot start it would perfectly aligned so an incorrect alignment procedure wouldn't be a factor, right? I'll try to add a track / screenshot later today or tomorrow: Hot start, on the ground, looking at a well define object.

Honest question: Can you determine from a track file where the HMD is pointing to? Or where the center of the physical headset is pointing to? If so, we could setup a mission, look to a particular object (head level and object 'centered' in the line of vision ) so you can grab something useful from the track file. I think this has been done with screenshot, but if that helps you somehow, I can do it.

@BIGNEWY Sorry, I fail to see how a track would help here. This is the same Quest 3 too high issue that had been reported multiple times in the past 2 or 3 years with different modules that had a helmet mounted sight. Here are a couple of the threads: This is a physical headset issue that can be only solved by making the HMD adjustable in the special options of the respective module, like the BS3 has.

Since we now have user deployable RSBM / PRMG systems in the sim, can we have a deployable ILS? https://www.icao.tv/thales/videos/thales-atm-d-ils

Confirmed. Created new mission: Single (to rule out taxi interreference) veteran AI Harrier at Batumi, take of from parking, with a few waypoints including a landing one. Plane goes to runway, nozzles to 10° and seems to me adding power but moves only inches at the most. Seems to be stuck in the runway.

250914B (September, 14th 2025) - Support for UH-60L DAP 2.0 mod added. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3344152/

250914A (September, 14th 2025) - Support for UH-60L 2.0 mod added. Support for prior version of the mod deprecated https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3344152/

The question is about if is is working (as is not broken), not if it is supported…

Is The Way working with the Kiowa Warrior?

So... Went ahead and did a sanity check before making changes and found that I was able to reproduce the issue in 2D and SP, which seems to indicate that it is something in my client PC. Then I deleted the fxo and metashaders2 folders to no effect. Decided to double check everything before reverting versions (since it was working fine after the last update). First, I turned the PC off and booted again to go into the BIOS (PC is turned off every night). Nothing changed there as expected, but "saved" and exited the BIOS anyway. Tested DCS again and problem went away... So, I'm scratching my head a little bit...

Thanks, will try later today

My wingman and I had been flying a particular mission for the last couple of weeks in my dedicated server. Until yesterday we both had excellent performances. Today, however, with no changes to my PC (DCS client), the mission or the dedicate server , my performance tanked while my wingman's remained unchanged... My dedicated server is in my LAN, 1ms ping, my wingman connects from the outside of my LAN. My SP performance is excellent but when I connect to any mission in my server , I get a slide show. I'm at a lost at the moment on how to approach the situation since I don't want to have a kneejerk reaction and changes configurations anywhere but ran out if ideas on how to troubleshot. Performance drop is apparent right at the start, in the join coalition screen, regardless of the complexity of the mission... Both machines were rebooted a couple of times each... I don't see any connectivity issue in my LAN... No windows update in the client or server, no driver changes and no AV software changes either. So, please, if you have an idea on what to look at, share it...

3 years and 3 variants...

Have you seen a telephone pole (SA-2) coming at your face yet?

LOL... Welcome to the darkside! We have cookies... And unlimited settings tweaking sessions!

My only objection to this thread is calling this content "bloatware". Poor choice of words.. Now, as for making the handful of GBs of content optional (10-15Gb if I read the OP correctly)... Is it really worth the dev time and gained complexity for such a small gain? Because, I can see the complains already for the additional bugs in the installer and because the dev are dedicating time to this and not "that" feature or the "other"... null

What you call "bloatware" is not. It is not unnecessary (for me, an other who had posted here at the very least) and therefore it does not match the definition of bloatware. At best, or worst, depending on the point of view, it should be optional content.

Hold shift while moving it

Yeah... ED Just keep up working hard and gives us the stuff for free... /sarcasms in case it flew over your heads...Pun definitely intended. Can't wait for the PTO , Hellcat and Zero... My wallet is READY