Falcon_S

Make your default zoom view with numpad and save with rAlt+Num0 , after that set buton for center view and that`s it. Zoom in / out >> center view button (if you want your default view)

I'm a little joking I have respect for you... And I understand... :thumbup:

:joystick: I must admit that I was an amateur with DCS:Su27. I'll try to change my tactics and from now always apply your pro advice. :D

I'm talking about those two minutes. Multiplied many times because... and because it is unnecessary. Su27 not need 9 tons of fuel for the 300km long route for ex. . And mission creator need about two minutes too, to edit fuel qty for maybe ten Su27 slots in mission. Just asking admins, if they can... it would be a nice. If not, thanks anyway. S!

S! Can you set all Su27 to have 50% fuel please. We needlessly wasting time while unload excess fuel and have trouble at the airport with too many planes, lag, crashes... We will be quick to get out of there. Please. Thanks in advance!

Guys, M2000 very often can`t be destroyed with few (hits) R-27 missiles. He fly with smoke and maneuver without trouble. Is that normal for that small plane vs. pretty deadly missiles?

Thank you Rossi. :thumbup:

Does the tool publicly available somewhere? Thanks in advance!

Nice. TY :thumbup:

BS guys, can you turn off the horror effect called "Model enlargment". Huge flying stains scare me. Yesterday I destroyed four but they constantly coming.

Thank you c0ff.

Of course it is a cheat. This mod, community was rejected a few years ago. Now again pushing it as something good. From now everything can be worse, the way how this mod functioning opens the door to others, show how to make cheat mods and avoid all dcs security protocols.

Why was prohibited at that time, LO1 time? And where you use it proudly at that time?

So, what is the point of that revolutionary IC then if cheat like a LEAVU can be used and can`t be detected?

Personally I think that both servers are overloaded. First, the number of available slots. According to my opinion, 40-45 slots is optimal (read maximum) for the EVERY DCS server and for clients on it. It does not matter what kind of machine is used as a server, high-end or min. recommended pc configuration. More than 40-45 people on EVERY server is to much/overload. Second, the missions that include to many unnecessary things as vehicles and equipment on the "wrong places" (irrational deployment of units) as well as their quantity. I was three years in the army and never saw tanks at the airport (near hangars or taxiway) as well as infantry units. Each vehicle is intended for specific military units and each unit has its strategic location. But in the DCS on each server in the same place (airport, city, area...) there are aviation, armored units, infantry, SAM units few meters near runway for example and many many more things... next, there are some static objects as scenery etc etc... and so at each place which is considered to be of interest. When we sum all these unnecessary things we get thousands of units in the mission loaded in server/client RAM + scripts = Rock 'N Roll getting started bacause overload. Lagg, freezing, mass kicking and server crashes are experienced by players with low-end PC`s and high-end PC`s at the same time... So? Far from it that I am a some DCS guru but the fact is that in missions are a lot of things that are not important for the final outcome for the mission on many servers and so on 373 and 104th servers too. This is just my opinion and pls don`t get me wrong. I respect mission designers and i know how much work and effort they invest for our fun and trying to satisfy all of us but anyway they should avoid to include anything and everything in mission. It is better to reduce the excessive size of mission (session) with a reduced number of players than the mass events that are unplayable.

:thumbup: Just playing while the multiplayer is unstable.

Today especially. :helpsmilie:

Thank you WD. :)

For all Su27 pilots, dancing with new wings... :)

About DCS F15C limits... Eagle have only one small problem - water. And yes, tacview not show G correcty. This eagle was in full +/- G in every maneuver with 3xF.Tanks, 8xAIM120. (...+ oil, pilot :D ) :doh: Tacview-20160411-161444-DCS.txt.rar

I confirm. And that is confused me in my first reaction.

Something like that :thumbup: +1

I use it as bands. See attachment...

http://www.endmemo.com/physics/weightforce.php 21400kg x 7.5G = 160500kg (weight/force N)