okopanja

Preliminary result: you have to connect to Contention server first. Afterwards my mission does not show PR anymore... @sleestakONE BIG APOLOGY FROM ME TO YOU!

God damn it, with trk it shows PR/LA Strange just got PR straight on Caucasus...

Let me reply trk myself (maybe in reply I do get PR). During flying I had not LA/PR at any time both on Caucasus and Syria...

NO LA_PR_Caucasus.trk Same here. Disabling FOG has no effect.

Here is the TRK file which reproduces the problem (Syria map!) @sleestakwhile we wait for the beta testers, please try this out and tell us does it work for you now. NO LA_PR.trk

Still ok you can tell us with which weather profile/settings it works and on which map. I hope others will check the rest.

Contention server is the best palce to try. And it is not a fog issue, it happens even at high altitudes with cold AB targets. @sleestakwe understood that works for you, good for you! Now please remain quiet and let multiple people having the same issue talk.

It can not do all of this things at the same time with no performance degradation.

I share your confidence, especially since the locations of all objects are well known inside the game engine.

Probably this needs report on HB, btw in the past (not sure if true still) Jester from F-14 was seeing through cockpit and calling on ET launches from below.

Updates: - added is the damage report of the airplane + image marking damage and structural diagram - Ilić did receive missile lock warning prior to being hit.

Yes, I am not surprised since I carefully tracked interviews of ED employees over the years, in particular sales director. The ditching of the arcade version of DCS I correctly understood as bringing DCS more to that mainstream market. My concern here is that the market for the arcade level of simulation is already saturated. Companies courting that kind of the audience are already established and quiet frankly they execute way better than ED. They also do not have the complexities of 3rd party integration and corresponding frictions on technical and business level. Even if they use the sub-contractors they do control that very strictly so the end effect always is toward their advantage. I am pretty sure I am not the only person stating the obvious.

With all due respect this sounded as a funny way to respond to constructive remark from loyal customer. Can you please elaborate how the multiplayer with modern sets would work? Whom will you motivate the fly on opposite side?

Su-30: +

Luminosity(as e.g. a glint of Sun reflection as I posted earlier) can play a great difference when it comes to the ranges at which you can spot the thing. This can be best seen in morning or eveming if airplane is positioned so it reflects light toward observer. There is no way you can miss this, looks like a very bright star in sky.

Is this one from the original 181xx series?

Depends on the airplane and their avionics upgrade. E.g. in Mig-29 we have in DCS this is pre-programmed on ground. Cockpit should have a keypad for entry of navpoint coordinates. There are various coordinate formats each with different precision.

Mission editor scripting can do this, but it will not work in multiplayer.

Yes, but they fought with that livery on, so actually more relevant.

Don't forgot SRJ "pepsi" paint scheme...

Where can we read more about it/this view?

Taken for the meme...

Have you ever tried to give an AI a task more complex than a single function?

Was about to suggest this. If you locate the story of Iljo Arizanov in 29 section, you will notice that he observed an aircraft still illuminated by the sun. I would estimate thatbthe distance must have been at least 37nm, since this was the time the AIM-120 was launched by Rico. One thing to note the dots should actually appear at different ranges dynamically. E.g. an airliner might be not visibile at ranges as close as 20km, but with glint this is several times longer. I was driving along one of the air traffic coridors yrsterday and was trying to judge the distances when at head of contrail I can actually spot the airplane.

We are all reading 64 of pages like this. I am pretty sure both ED and us are sick of it. Clearly this is about a personal preference, so why not allow people being seen to opt in/out? E.g. something like this: 1. I agree to be shown as 1 pixel or 2 pixel on HD display? So basically this would solve the problem of ground pounders not wanting to be shown as blocks. If you do not agree to this: you can not use the option yourself. 2 . Or make this valid only for air to air jets, and leave the helis and dedicated ground pounders concealed? And hopefully this would make @SharpeXB and @Tippis both happy.