Jump to content

okopanja

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2070

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by okopanja

  1. okopanja
    Reproduced: it goes after jammer. The only way it can actually hit aircraft is if it is on ground and not moving fast. Would be interesting to see if HARM would do the same. Flanker provided to show that ECM is on. JF-17 LD-10_against jammer.trk
  2. okopanja
    Happened to me at least 5 times, likely not intended, but actually plausible
  3. okopanja

    Skin Wish List

    okopanja replied to ustio's topic in Wish List

    Btw, there are ongoing problems with e.g. reworked F-5 liveries, since these community designers have now issues with loading of the models into ModelViewer2. I am concerned that the same problem will occur with Mig-29.
  4. okopanja

    Skin Wish List

    okopanja replied to ustio's topic in Wish List

    Should only 9.12a liveries be used?
  5. okopanja
    Roger, better move there, but it's pity since the majority of samples provided by @Ronin_Gaijin was in this thread. Do you think ED should provide the GCI officer screens as well?
  6. okopanja
    So, since we have seen so many pictures, which liveries do you think ED will include in the official Mig-29 module?
  7. okopanja
    Well it clear this is already decided, yet being ablr to disable e.g. DL would be good for servers which try to match airframes with historic capabilities. Something similar was done with BS3, you can force an older version. Why not with an eagle?
  8. okopanja
    IMHO: posting it like this is rude. And btw, there are us who actually liked each and every picture posted here.
  9. okopanja
    Its rare to see private unit videos like this. Thank you.
  10. okopanja
    BTW: here I almost managed to get the team kill:
  11. okopanja
    Was doing SEAD yesterday on contention. LD-10 was flying where I told it to, but in final stage it turned toward maneuvering harrier. SInce on this server harries use jammers, its very likely that anti-radiation missiles switch to them, since they emit in the same band as radar would be. Sadly no air kill.
  12. okopanja
    This is not hypothetical, Mig pilot is more than willing to sacrifice his life for the motherland.
  13. okopanja
    Any known example you can share?
  14. okopanja
    How about this?
  15. okopanja
    There were 2 more on March 26th. Go to FF Mig-29 forum section and you will find 4 stories I published so far. https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1217-dcs-mig-29a-fulcrum/ I think ED should allow at least for mission maker/server to enforce missing features.
  16. okopanja
    4 confirmed kills, and yes this was the version used in 1999. However it should be noted that these kills except in one case involved firing at minimum 2 missiles per aircraft. Regarding the NVGs, Mike "Dozer" Shower stated no NVGs during the fight he had, and this was on the first evening of the aggression. Also Cesar "Rico" Rodriguez, also stated no NVGs...
  17. okopanja
    This is becoming one of those Pluto-is-not-a-planet discussions. Its like "Hey I did it first but forgot to file patent application". We all know who did it first in front of the public and at such low altitude.
  18. okopanja
    I just used the missiles on contention on 2 guys, no problem PR.
  19. okopanja
    Looks like we got a fix, can anyone else confirm?
  20. okopanja
    No mentioning in release notes: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/changelog/release/2.9.12.5336/
  21. okopanja
    This is correct conclusion, but again not sure if it is a fog thing. I was able to activate the condition by trying to connect to contention which was 100% occupied, I did not even get to the lobby of the server. Just plain rejected connect attempt was enough to trigger the condition and only on this server! Maybe there are others as well, since this may very much have to do with their settings on server or with the mission file itself (I am not sure if attempt to connect results in immediate miz file download, or only after the server accepts it). Whatever the root cause is, it is safe to state that FC3 avionics of flanker/fulcrum get screwed up permanently. At all this time e.g. FIO mode works just fine, you get the tone. Missiles also track the target. I did make a full repair(slow) + cleanup including disabling any of the mods, and it still behaved the same.
  22. okopanja
    Dude, congrats! You have proven to be an expert, I have not seen recently so many people comment on the post at least since the announcement of F-35.
  23. okopanja
    Its ok, btw meanwhike I did cleanup and repair, including disabling any of the mods. Still the same, will do full repair and try again.
  24. okopanja
    Need to walk the dog now... Will come to check later...
  25. okopanja
    @Ironhand Steps to reproduce: Make sure DCS is not running Start DCS In multiplayer, connect to Contention server (syria 80s) On start screen click disconnect (you may even spawn, just connect and immediate disconnect is enough) Play trk (or open it as a mission), the PR will not appear anymore. One remark: I tried multiple servers on Caucasus and Syria, only on Contention this happened. I took a look at their miz, file all the things that occur there are invoked from lua files loaded on their server. So likely something they do there affects the clients afterwards.
×
×
  • Create New...