dcn

Your logic is really incomprehensible. Imagine that the Hornet you paid for suddenly became free, wouldn't you be angry? The only difference is that the Su-25 is much cheaper.

Why should I be thankful?I just know that I spent money.

The module I paid for suddenly became free,this is really ridiculous.

I don't know why you say this.People just analyzed that IFE's next module is probably F-117.

That's wonderful!I didn't think about that.I simply thought January 17th=1.17

Well, I thought ED and IFE were as close as Trump and Musk these days... The support I mentioned is verbal support, not that IFE helped ED develop F-35, which is clearly stated in the IFE's statement of 'We are not involved'

You said what I thought.Considering that IFE supports ED in developing F-35 and that the news this week was about IFE's G.91, that IFE seems to be close to ED recently, and that the 2025 and beyond video was released on January 16th, close to January 17th, and that January 17th seemed to hint at the 117, I think there is a 99% chance that the next aircraft of IFE will be F-117.

Never. Since the release of Mosquito, we have three WWII aircraft waiting to be released. The problem is that the development speed of WWII aircraft modules is too slow and there are no more third parties willing to develop WWII aircraft module.

This is what I want to say. Isn't the purpose of playing DCS to be as realistic as possible? If some procedures are imaginary, why should I spend time reading DCS manual to learn it?I studied like a nerd for a long time, but what I learned was a fictitious procedure?

I don't know why so many people say this.So we shouldn't complain when ED releases X-wing module in DCS? I think there is no difference between releasing F-35 module in DCS and releasing X-wing module in DCS.

That's interesting.Never knew this.Thank you.

I think currently all the modules in DCS are greater than 80% real, while DCS:F-35 is infinitely close to 0% real. I don't know why so many people say this, the first third party module is Belsimtek's UH-1H.

If ED insists on launching F-35 module, I suggest DCS be renamed MAC, then we will all shut up.

I don't know why so many people think DCS F-35 is better than FC3...FC3 is still based on solid documents,while DCS F-35...

Do you support ED launching F-35 module?

Maybe ED can't make much money from us old players, so they need gimmicks to attract new players, a lot of new players.

Now it seems that the J-8PP has already foreshadowed this day.

It is these people who demand 'historically correct' plane sets and maps that ruined DCS WWII.Why are these people so demanding of DCS WWII?When Phantom was released I never heard anyone complain about not having a Vietnam map.

Merry Christmas!Glad to see the update.When can we see the tutorial video like cold start?

Comprehension?I read it from discord I/JG7_Moto and two people in this topic also mentioned it.

So the development of La-7 was frozen is just a rumor?

It seems that La-7 has become another M3 Corsair.

This can't explain why there is only only mod(Lancaster). I think the most important reason is that most developers are not interested in WWII,Crosstail is developing A-1H but it's not WWII aircraft,people seem to prefer scenes like Veitnam more.It's actually more profitable to develop WWII aircraft because it's much easier to develop than cold war aircraft and the price is not much cheaper.(I know this statement may not be accurate because information about WWII aircraft may be harder to find, but in terms of aircraft system complexity) Additionally, the difficulty of developing DCS modules may have made developers unwilling to develop WWII aircraft.MSFS has more WWII aircraft than DCS. IndiaFoxtEcho and FlyingIron are more willing to develop MSFS products.

It's a shame there are only two third parties developing WWII aircraft module for DCS,there even aren't many people developing mods.

Would appreciate it if you could provide me the source.