Wyvern

It stands for Deka Ironwork Simluations, short DIS

Additional Photos, also visible here: AL-31 engine and again, no MAWS This hud appears to be the russian one, but im not surenullnull

As mentioned in the JF-17 SD-10 thread, there are pictures of a/multiple J-11As carrying the PL-12. You can see here:: White antenna section behind the nose, the Black-grey nose cone, only present on the Su-30MKK and the J-11A RKL-609 on the Wingtip, also only carried by Russian Versions It also doesn't have the Beidou MAWS in the picture

I mean... Its hard to tell, I dont know about the cockpit, howvever you can faintly see the hud in one of the pictures, and it seems to be the Russian type, it has the russian nose cone, the white antenna section, AL-31 engines, no MAWS, and it had the RKL-609 pods, which only the J-11A and the Su-30MKK carries. Anyway, I am going off topic here, I'll make a new post in the J-11A thread

@uboats Is the PL-12 supposed to show up as Unknown in the SMS page? It can be fired but shows up as unknown Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk Jeff_PL-12_Test.trk

well, the J-11A does carry the PL-12 IRL from what I have seen

If anything, they will plobably only put it onto the J-11A, however that is very unlikely, the only reason they have done this here, is so we can test the stuff. JF-17 doesnt carry the PL-12 IRL

nullNot officially added, but they made a change so people can test the AIM--120C API on the SD-10. It breaks Integity Check, but is allowed on 4YA PvE servers and other servers with IC turned off. From the changelog:

I made a quick tutorial on how to enable the PL-12 on the JF-17.

He was not replying to you

Put those into the Description.lua {"JF-17_pilot_helmet", DIFFUSE , "jf-17_pilot_helmet", false}; {"lambert3SG", DIFFUSE , "jf-17_pilot_helmet", false};

the PL-12 is already in the game. plus you can already arm the J-11A with them, there is a mod for that on the UF.

Fixed can also mean that it is fixed internally, but it will only launch in the next patch.

And as BigBorner already said, what will changing the scheme do? Last I have seen, the AIM-120 still has issues with tracking (losing track when enemy jettisons tanks for example) From what I see, the missile seems to intercept targets normally, but will sometimes mistake the target's position by about 20 meters and miss. My suggestion is, keeping it for now, until the 120 is fixed again, or try to figure out what exactly is wrong with the SD-10 Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

If the change is going to break the SD-10 just like the LD-10 when it was Switched to the AGM-88, then I'd rather not have the change and keep the current state. Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

did you happen to ever use an extra screen?

ah ight then

IRL or DCS? the DCS one is the manual for the Su-27 in DCS, not the actual thing, thats why the bypass mode for the R-77 is wrongly presented as TWS

I noticed this too, but if you leave the FOV on wide, the issue isnt as steong Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

thats all they have, they dont have an Discord, since its banned in China.

its because they are Dynamic, you can change them

i think i will make one

yup, its something with the update. I downloaded Stable off Steam, and that MV seems to work just fine