Wyvern

If anything, they will plobably only put it onto the J-11A, however that is very unlikely, the only reason they have done this here, is so we can test the stuff. JF-17 doesnt carry the PL-12 IRL

nullNot officially added, but they made a change so people can test the AIM--120C API on the SD-10. It breaks Integity Check, but is allowed on 4YA PvE servers and other servers with IC turned off. From the changelog:

I made a quick tutorial on how to enable the PL-12 on the JF-17.

He was not replying to you

Put those into the Description.lua {"JF-17_pilot_helmet", DIFFUSE , "jf-17_pilot_helmet", false}; {"lambert3SG", DIFFUSE , "jf-17_pilot_helmet", false};

the PL-12 is already in the game. plus you can already arm the J-11A with them, there is a mod for that on the UF.

Fixed can also mean that it is fixed internally, but it will only launch in the next patch.

And as BigBorner already said, what will changing the scheme do? Last I have seen, the AIM-120 still has issues with tracking (losing track when enemy jettisons tanks for example) From what I see, the missile seems to intercept targets normally, but will sometimes mistake the target's position by about 20 meters and miss. My suggestion is, keeping it for now, until the 120 is fixed again, or try to figure out what exactly is wrong with the SD-10 Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

If the change is going to break the SD-10 just like the LD-10 when it was Switched to the AGM-88, then I'd rather not have the change and keep the current state. Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

did you happen to ever use an extra screen?

ah ight then

IRL or DCS? the DCS one is the manual for the Su-27 in DCS, not the actual thing, thats why the bypass mode for the R-77 is wrongly presented as TWS

I noticed this too, but if you leave the FOV on wide, the issue isnt as steong Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

thats all they have, they dont have an Discord, since its banned in China.

its because they are Dynamic, you can change them

i think i will make one

yup, its something with the update. I downloaded Stable off Steam, and that MV seems to work just fine

I see what you mean, but I have to say, I like getting on in the evening, without having to keep 100% focused, I do appreciate having Datalink and Mavericks or JDAMs, which just nice when chilling and watching youtube on the side. And yes, i could also play Ace Combat if i want to blow up stuff with no effort, but DCS has the better physics ;3

I just would like to mention that China did copy a lot of designs in the past. Although i would argue that, this isnt something negative. Its just an step in the Evolution of an Design, first you copy something and use it to learn from its mistakes to become better and make an better product. To somewhat get onto topic, even if China copied design choices from the Su-15 or if they copied other stuff from the US or other foreign nations, its quite smart. Why waste money re-inventing someone's working technology, if its cheaper to recreate it. Also, if China did manage to copy (or "steal") foreign designs, that just means their Intelligence Agencies are better than the foreign ones. As for the J-11 and the Su-27, I mean, cmon. The J-11 based off the Su-27, even through to the J-16, its obvious. The J-15 is quite literally an Reverse Engineered and upgraded Su-33. J-20 has some similarities to the MiG-1.44/MiG-MFI. JF-17 seems like its inspired from the F-20 but mixed with an J-7, which in turn is an Upgraded copy of the MiG-21 (although licensed) As I said, "even if China copied design choices from... ...foreign nations, its quite smart. Why waste money re-inventing someone's working technology, if its cheaper to recreate it... ...that just means their Intelligence Agencies are better than the foreign ones" But asides from that, you need to keep in mind how much intel was actually stolen through spies, cooperation in an desperate cold war, and how a lot of planes from an similar Era look very similar. As an example, i've read a long time ago that BAC had an design for an Harrier and Jaguar succession, that shared similarities to the Su-27s and F-15s design. That explains the similarities in the MiG-25s and F-15s design. In the Su-15 case, i assume that both Chinese and Soviet Engineers came up with similar Ideas for their designs, similar to how a lot of planes that were designed at the same time. Especially when considering that the Chinese Probably studied the Soviet designs carefully. Did the J-8II share similarites with the Su-15? yes. Is it a copy? Most likely not. I think that is the kind of spirit behind technology, there is only one perfect solution, which can only lead to all the designs being similar, as they all try to be as close to the perfect design as possible. Hey, thats almost philosophic... But keep in mind to stay respectful to everyone on here. If someone is an A-hole, dont be an A-hole yourself, be better: Remain calm and respectful. Thanks for reading, have a nice weekend.

I even think that the Very Early PL-12s also had an R-77 Seeker that made them compatible. What I would be interested in would the R-27A and the R-27EA, basically an Active R-27

I am downloading stable on steam rn, ill check. Thanks for the files!

I appreciate that, but i need the AGM-65D, AGM-65H, and the HARMs... But, what youre saying is, the Stable Model Viewer works?

That has nothing to do with the Model Viewer, Its an issue of the pilot model name being different, i think when the modelviewer gets fixed, it should work

basically what i did here was: -open the J-11A model -click "generate livery file" Then it crashed Note: The Modelviewer crashes whenever i hit "generate livery file", regardless which model is open