Azrayen

It's a feature for developpers/debugging, de-activated on release versions.

Good question; perhaps a typo? Sounds illogical indeed to me too.

Nice vid anyway; found it there too.

Not on the M-2000C. TFR is on the N and D variants.

It is known :)

You should :) Or a track.

ZHeN, this is not what I saw. Plus I don't see how you can be sure that F-16 (AI in DCS, by definition) switches from TWS to STT ;) Last time I checked: - missile alarm sound when radar SAM launch (not tested all types => to be done) OK - missile alarm sound when Fox 3 goes pitbull OK - no missile alarm sound when fighter (any) shoots Fox 1 (only the lock sound) (but slight difference visually on the RWR if you pay attention). BUG

Good news :)

Do they? Not my recollection. A few seconds more generally.

Didi, really?

You won't get the specifics, but principles are available most of the time. Not main stream publications, but still. And when not, indeed educated guess is the way to go. You may read what Tharos wrote about the F-15 (in another topic, sorry I have not time to find the link now) on that matter.

silentconvo, agreed in general. Just one point: CW is not used on all the fighters we have. So it's not "only" the CW that RWR should be able to detect; that would be "too easy" ;) (I'm speaking about the missile guidance phase, of course)

Nothing more for me as of now. :)

Overall, probably simpler indeed; but I'm sure it manages that specific (& important) point :)

Zeus, perhaps the notion of radar horizon could be implemented (if it's not already)? Based on FC aircraft constatations (people, don't fret, FC modelization of air-air radar is quite evoluted): - doppler filter is only activated when ground returns are detected - this is calculated (for FC) by a tangent to the horizon: if all of your beam is above this tangent, then no doppler filter = no capability for the bandit to notch you. - I don't think FC aircraft take the mountains into account. Perhaps this is doable for DCS modules? Would be even better.

No I meant tuning the code of the aircraft = not something you or I can do, it has to be Razbam (if need be). This is part of the beta process ;)

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_(jeu_vid%C3%A9o) 1er lien sur Google avec la recherche "qu'est ce qu'un mod ?" :)

Did you look at your controls list, in games options, per chance? ;)

No, I'm on Caucasus mostly. But sure, if you use Nevada, it still hasn't got the update that fixes most of the issues related to lock. And what is the bandit doing, then? Notching/beaming? Are you above or below him? Are you familiar with doppler limitations? Let's please (all) describe better what happens. As far as I saw it, it's never "random". And again: if your target is beaming you, or if its relative speed is ~0, then a doppler radar will have problems. How much remains to be seen, but unless you have a different scenario, it's theorically logic, and as such I see this as intended.

As a side note, about the INS/GPS modern systems: This is what happens when implementation got it wrong (and is "too much" confident about GPS signals): [ame]http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Notice/GENOT_7110_711_EMB-300.pdf[/ame] System should have detected GPS problem and reverted to INS source "only". Didn't. Woops. = = = = = I'm not sure M-2000C's INS is "modern" enough, though.

Take care ;) (I share your pain)

N = 49%, that's ground idle :detective: IAS = 0 VS = 0 ... :smartass:

blast, I share some of your concern. There is a remaining bug with PID/TWS. This one is known, but fix doesn't seem easy. About PIC/STT, perhaps the doppler filter needs tuning? I can't tell for sure, because I haven't had the time to fly dedicated tests missions. Indeed so far, I saw radar unlock (or even contact lost on RWS) only when: - target is beaming - target relative speed is ~0 Both cases are logic, and intended. Now for the fine tuning part...

mattebubben, don't worry about people (in general), worry about Razbam guys. And you got an answer: :) Let's sit tight while Zeus is doing the INS, and see what happens next, shall we? ;)

Well, the product page reads: (my emphasis) So rest assured you won't be extra-charged for any of the feature listed. They will come with no additional charges when they're ready. And when all of them will be there, then the "early access/beta phase" of the module will be over :) ++ Az'