Jump to content

Azrayen

ED Translators
  • Posts

    3691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Azrayen

  1. @Tharos: When I said "worth it" (or not), it was in the general DCS context. Of course I agree this area of simulation is currently under-modelled and it would be worth enhancing it, all other things equal. But as Zeus reminded us, lots of other projects exist. And I feel comfortable with the idea that, for the same amount of worktime, it's better to work on matters on which documentation/classification is less of an issue. :) ++
  2. I have to disagree (too), sorry. :ermm: The choice not to want to buy another full price module that "looks alike" the M-2000 is yours only, I won't try to convince you to change your mind. But besides their delta shape, general architecture and family name, both birds are so different that in term of work to do (by Razbam), the "full module / full price" is totally justified IMO. - airframe - flight controls - stability/maneuverability - engine - radar - nav system - avionics - weapons/loadouts (generation) (capabilities) all is different! ++ Az'
  3. /bump because there are talks about the M-III, so a reminder for those who want it (1st post).
  4. That would be a DCS level evolution (all jammer-equipped and all radar-equipped aircraft). So heavy "cost". Not sure it's worth it/likely.
  5. No, it's been noted and will be fixed.
  6. Duplicate http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=167102 ;)
  7. It works here without TARGET (never tried with for now).
  8. Bonsoir SkyEM, Pas à ma connaissance. Je te suggère de te rapprocher directement de Leatherneck, ils seront sans doute heureux de te confirmer (selon les infos qu'ils ont). ++ Az'
  9. Ah, c'est bien ça. :) Mais pourquoi écrire si gros ? :huh:
  10. Even so. PIC is possible only in HFR. This is radar-related.
  11. Rogonaut: https://www.lotatc.com/projects/lotatc/wiki/Documentation ;)
  12. The "real Mirage manual" describes a start-up with ground power available. As CrashO said, this is the normal way of starting-up the aircraft. In this case, AC buses are then powered, and LP pumps work as soon as they're switched On. If you start without ground power, only the start-up pump is powered (this one works on DC power, for this very reason). Read §1.3 in the RL manual. At N = 45%, the engine turns quick enough for the alternators to come online. From that point onwards, you have full AC power (and working LP pumps).
  13. Hi 1 & 2: reported, thanks. 3: already WIP in dev, hope it be available soon. @ CrashO: not really a "lack" of power, LP pumps are powered by AC, battery doesn't do that (except for a tiny part of essential systems). Actually, LP pumps L&R are powered by AC Main bus #2 (refer to diagram in manual). ++
  14. As it's a non-default system for the C variant (that is modelized), I would guess this has a lower priority than other systems that are included on the real Cs, such as the INS. So... after beta is finished? I'm confortable with that.
  15. Probably. Wouldn't be CCM anymore elsewhere ;)
  16. mytai01 & Jugdriver, Did you try to reset your controls? (only temporarily, to see if it "solves" the problem => would help to understand it, which is the first step needed for Razbam to be able to try to fix it). How? Simple: 1/ move your C:\Users\<your_username>\Saved Games\DCS\Config\Input\M-2000C folder to your desktop (that way DCS won't see it, and won't use it). 2/ launch DCS, test again --> problem still there? then it was a false lead. Replace your folder in its original path. And let's keep looking for what causes problem. --> problem solved? then your personal config files are probably outdated/blocking DCS; you can re-do your controls, and why not post your config files so that ED or Razbam can look into them to (perhaps?) find a root cause.
  17. Oh, little confusion in the manual, here, Zeus. TAS is not the acronym for Téléaffichage. Téléaffichage = indeed, from GCI and as said jojo for homeland. Litteral translation = remote display. It's abbreviated TEL (on the IDN/HSI). TAS = short for Télémétrie Air Sol => Air-to-Ground Ranging (via the radar). ++ Az'
  18. Techniquement impossible. Tu fais forcément une erreur. Soit il ne sont sont pas à 60 km d'écart, soit il ne s'agit pas de la VTH (ni de la VTB d'ailleurs) (mais plutôt du RWR Serval) Si tu veux connaître la distance d'un (groupe de) contact(s), utilise ton radar. Ou demande au contrôleur (AWACS). Heureusement, il a dit km et non nm. ;)
  19. It's above the limit actually, in particular for front tyres.
  20. Distance ? Jamming ?
  21. Azrayen

    Removed

    This is not a bug, this is expected behaviour. The contact is lower than you (= in ground clutter) so your radar use doppler filter. And then he beams you = goes into the blind zone for your radar, which lose lock. Try again while being lower than him! ;) = = = = @ OldE24: no red or yellow dashed lines anymore vs a jamming target; that was not realistic and has been removed. Now "only" the fake contacts & green dashed line (above BT) + the real contact and its closing mach (below BT).
  22. This is for the A-10C. They have an FM radio. The M-2000 doesn't.
  23. Azrayen

    Removed

    Both are English acronyms. CCM = Close Combat Modes CAC = Close Air Combat So yes, CCM = CAC modes.
×
×
  • Create New...