Azrayen

Agreed that MIL seems to weak ATM. @ CptSmiley, details to follow when I'm back from work trip.

AFAIK interrogation is always triggered by the pilot. Choices are a "band" around TDC azimuth (not simulated ATM) or a full scope interrogation.

They will be released soon. :)

Yup. Been there since a while. Not sure it was even reported as it's relatively low priotity IMO

Never tried that. Full A/B is mandatory for taking off in this aircraft. No exceptions. As for the tyres, 190 should be close to or even above their speed limit + we always put stress on them when rotating.

FWIW during alignment (IRL), the pilot does his pre-flight walkaround. As simple as that ;)

@spec10 I agree re: cursor disparition being "breaking" category, I wasn't aware of this issue when I posted earlier.

@ZHeN: agreed with lemoen's answer.

^^ This! Way to go! :thumbup:

@ ZHeN: The question could be: why wouldn't you? Using GPU and aligning INS are SOPs for this aircraft.

Yeah, Wikipedia is not always reliable. It's even plain wrong on this particular thing. I edited the article. MICA IR is planned as an upgrade on the 2000D variant, which is to be kept on inventory for years to come, along with Rafales, while the Magic II are becoming obsolete (both in technique and in lifetime of the built missiles). As of 2016, MICA are only available on the 2000-5 and later variants, and on the Rafale. It was never planned (except perhaps in "what if" marketing/booze nights) on the 2000C.

Any VHF or UHF band frequency, I guess...

You're not alone indeed :) I agree that no software is ever bug free, and I don't remember any recent specific occurence of sim breaking bug in release. OTOH, even non-breaking bugs are sometimes killing the fun to fly. Yes, DCS is moving forward quickly (and it's a nice thing!!:thumbup:) I still feel that one week is really short to catch, fix and re-test many bugs (even when you do this for a living - I do sometimes - and not "only" on our free-time like many DCS testers). My personal opinion (doesn't engage anyone out of my little self), and suggestion for a better product: - Open beta: --- can have as many bugs as devs can manage to create (:smartass:) - Stable: --- should have no crash-bugs (already done) --- should aim toward no major bugs, only minor ones (*) If the "price" to get the latter is to have to wait 2, 3, 4 more weeks for a "stable" release, that's really not an issue as far as I'm concerned: I use OB branch as well. (*) I'm aware this could lead to lenghty discussions about what is a minor bug and what is a major one, but that's for another day :D Regards, Az'

Yes, it's outdated. I guess it's best to polish some controls and features before re-vamping the auto-procedure.

No. "PCA select" is the center of the 3-position switch: - select AA Guns - select nothing = manage via PCA - select MAGIC = it means return to "neutral". IRL you can't use the "PCA select" if you haven't first selected AA Guns or MAGIC. It's a physical impossibility. Now, about the fact that it select AA Guns: currently, guns is some kind of "default mode" whenever Master Arm is set to Arm. It's not how it should be, but it's how it is in DCS for now. This is already known & reported. ++ Az'

Can't you set the JTAC freq instead? Seems: - easier - faster - more realistic

No. Just like IRL, by the way ;)

No. Unless you've CALC failure.

Hi What about diving more? :)

Click on the knob. Of course, you'll have remembered first to power it with the CMGS/H.SEC switch to the Auto (middle) position on the right console ;)

OK cool thanks Zeus.

2. Built in. Implemented.

What what ?

While we're there... GBU on fuselage forward 2 points I get it. It's a recent "addition" for the French Mirage. GBU on fuselage rear 2 points I don't think it's an "open" configuration IRL: - it's tight! - aerodynamics issues when releasing the bomb.

IFF is not available. IFF Interrogator is. It interrogates and gets and answer based on the coalition (blue/red - DCS editor) the radar contacts are linked to.