Qcumber

The new nly way to reduce ghosting and smearing with DLAA/DLSS is to increase resolution. I would suggest trying Quad Views Foveated Rendering in fixed mode so you can set the centre resolution to about 1.5 and the periphery to about 0.5. this will reduce the artifacts. You can also use DLSS quality.

What is your setup and DCS settings?

Could you please elaborate? In what ways is it better? I am genuinely interested in if it is worth getting one. How does visual quality compare? And comfort?

What resolution are you running the headset at and what are your DCS settings?

Sweet spot refers to the centre focus. Fresnel lenses tend to have a small area of "good" focus in the centre. The lenses on the Quest Pro (and Q3, and Pixel Light, Super etc) are "good" across the whole frame. I can't comment on FoV.

I have not tested it yet. I will try to look later today.

I have tried the D9 a few times but have not bought it. I just couldn't get to grips with it. The K4 is my favorite warbird. I'm not sure why but I got the hang of it really quickly. I love flying it. I struggle with the A8 and the p47. I'm enjoying the F4U but not there yet. I might give the D9 another go.

DLSS 310.4.0 is out. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/nvidia-dlss-dll/

You will be constantly tweaking as you learn more. Welcome to the bottomless pit of VR. There is no return.

You would be better off using Godlike or Ultra and leave PD at 1.0. The next thing I would suggest is using Quad Views Foveated Rendering. This will give you a performance boost and allow you to run a higher resolution in the centre of view. I used QVFR in fixed mode with my Pico 4 for about a year before I bought a Quest Pro. BTW you can pick up a used QP for about £300-400 on eBay if you want to try out Dynamic Foveated Rendering.

Sorry. I meant your headset. I see that you are using VD and have PD at 1.1 in DCS. What setting do you have in VD? Godlike?

What resolution are you using?

It looks like you have re-projection (SSW, or Synchronous Space Warp) enabled. This will half the frame rate and insert extra frames to keep 72Hz. In VD look for the setting SSW enabled, disabled and automatic in the headset VD menu and set it to "disabled". The you will see your actual FPS.

On paper the PSVR2 appears to be better but the QP is a very good headset; much better than the raw stats would suggest. I had hoped that someone might have direct experience with both the QP and PSVR2.

Does anyone have a Super living near(ish) Cambridge UK that would be willing to demo? I'd really like to see how it looks.

I'm saving up for this: https://dofreality.com/flight-motion-simulator/

I have not gone above 12.5 GB even with the Phantom over Germany or Marianas. I agree that 24 GB has better longevity than 16 GB though. If the rumors are true.

Get a third party one rather than a Meta one. A lot cheaper. e.g. https://amzn.eu/d/6hLLTmT This one also has a charging port. Another option to consider is using Virtual Desktop rather than Meta link.

Wait until you accidentally crash into another plane. The first time is a real shock!!

Yes. It's now an neverending journey. There is no going back. Be prepared for a steep learning curve in optimisation though. Luckily there is lots of support on this forum.

Does anyone have a direct comparison? The Quest Pro is a very good headset and can be bought for a similar price to the PSVR2 (in the UK at least). The QP lenses are excellent. The PSVR2 has Fresnel lenses so how does the quality compare?

The QP is often misunderstood. What I am looking for is a QP with a higher pixel density.

What are peoples experiences with the PSVR2 after a few months use? I am interested in this now that eye tracking is enabled and can benefit from Quad Views Foveated Rendering.

Thanks for your positive feedback. That is reassuring. It is often the case that the minority shouts the loudest. I have the impression that Pimax really wants to create a product aimed at DCS users. I respect that. At the moment I am not sure which is the best headset to get. The Super sounds great (all 3' versions) but the upcoming Dream Air and SE version are also very interesting.

That sums up the QP pretty well. Especially the open sides etc. It suits me perfectly. I have tried running without eye tracking and no DLSS but there is too much shimmer, even with MSAA x4. That's why I run a high but small Foveated region (equivalent to about 4800 pixels) as there are no artifacts with DLAA/DLSS. The Pimax Super is tempting but the reasons I am hesitant are: 1) It's expensive. 2) The form factor is huge. 3) There is a long wait for shipping. I am also interested in the Dream Air. Smaller, lighter and about the same FOV as the Quest Pro.