Jump to content

Viper33

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Viper33

  1. @MARLAN_ is correct here. Think about it - what does L&S stand for? Launch and Steering. Why would the missile need a radar lock if all trackfiles are treated the same within the system - the only limiting factor for launch/engagement is the FOV of the radar dish as the missile still needs the DL/M-Link channels for midcourse guidence support. Having a STT for example would only increase the quality of the track and allow to operate single-ship with no off-board support. The public manuals specifically state the requirements for an L&S. All you need to understand is - a trackfile is a trackfile.
  2. It doesnt take the canopy into account among other things.
  3. SRS is still far superior. Both from the use, options available like MIDS radios, modulation and background noise (type of jet and canopy position making a difference etc.).
  4. Also noticed. They looked great when they came out but with MT (or something else) there is this clear grid pattern, which also affects contrails and missile trails now. Lack of particles for a lack of a better term. Would be also neat to have proper fog, wind effects, and turbulence + icing within clouds under proper conditions.
  5. There generally should be Husky and Pitbull indications in the HUD. Not in DCS right now.
  6. The nuts and bolts in the aft portion of the cockpit behind the seat seem to be missing the textures which are present on the moving part of the canopy. Along with some other details being untextured or low detail. Would be great if this can be fixed and improved. Thanks.
      • 2
      • Like
×
×
  • Create New...