Jump to content

Viper33

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Viper33

  1. No plane in DCS that can carry it outside of maybe AI.
  2. So when will you guys finally update the R-77?
  3. Majority of the size seems to be Kola witht he new sat imagery.
  4. Sniper pod for the Viper nowhere to be seen. Judging by the changelog only one person has worked on the Viper and Hornet for the past moth or so.
  5. It would be great if ED's "SME's" could be active on the forums or public channels and actually explain and show why they think the DCS Viper behavior is right. Would love to see it. Simply saying "trust us" is far from scientific and is never considered as an argument or proof for any bug report. Considering the many FM reworks and improvements this only proves that the FM was far freom ideal on release and in the first years of EA. Seen several SME's, some more active and known ones like Mover, who said that the DCS Viper is pretty off in some regimes of the envelope. Just modeling the Ps0 line is far from enough for a flight model. SEP across the envelope as well as the correct moments across all axes are way more important.
  6. Why don't you apply to one of HB's open positions? Otherwise nothing will change if you just keep posting your math.
  7. Because you literally said the F-4 would not affect F-14 development. It's also not a complete module release but part of an EA roadmap you started 5 years ago.
  8. Yeah I disagree. Not what I paid for.
  9. Can you send me a link to the stament by ED? It does not matter whether they breahced a contract, officially RB is being accused of an IP violation in MCS (not DCS) with their Super Tucano undertaking. Even if this was absolutely the case you don't use this discpute to not pay developers and extort and pressure them. So all the "leaks" of emails and conversations as well as ED's internal communications platform were fake and made up and out of context? I have not seen a single bit of proof by ED what the exact breach is and why it is ok to not pay developers for over a year and still sell their product on their store? I can't get a refund on Steam. Already tried.
  10. And I was never talking about the other ones. They are out of EA, clearly. Only 15E talk here from now on. Yes I am a consumer, a customer. And customers are entitled to get information about their purchased products and their support. Simple as that. I'm not stomping my feet here whatsoever, I'm simply asking for a source as to why you people seem to act like you know everything and that ED has provided enough evidence outside of vague statements for you to believe them. I am very open to be corrected or proven wrong when confronted with a source or evidence for those claims. Speak for yourself.
  11. The numbers come from Ron and the developers. All of these leaks and very real and valid, whether you like it or not. Obviously they won't disclose who exactly. So far ED is the sole party that has not provided ANY official statement or proof/receipts that prove the dispute being justified. Unless I have completely missed something in which case please provide the evidence and official statements by ED.
  12. When have they taken the F-15E out of EA? I only own the F-15E, nothing else. And this thing has just come out in EA and won't receive any roadmap items that it was advertised with at this point. Don't try to twist my words and bring up old, completely unrelated issues. You're just delusitonal at this point. Please elaborate.
  13. Whether this is true or not - only time will show. And you do realize what "in their current state" means, right?
  14. So I guess we won't see the early A and A-6 AI this year either now? Why all this silence after F-4 release?
  15. Any chance you could add these pilot models to the Hind as an option? Ukrain Army Aviation use the same pilot equipment.
  16. Regarding the "new" sounds - I can barely tell a difference other than the canopy open now producing a slightly louder engine tone internally (still not nearly enough) and there still being an overly windy exhaust sound mix in the aft as well as the old looped AB sounds. An improvement but not quite realistic still either.
  17. DCS is literally dying. ED doesn't know what they are doing anymore. I thought the removal of "open beta" meant more testing and more stable updates but what we got was the opposite and fewer updates to begin with.
  18. So to make this clear, can Onretech please contact Steam so customers can request a refund as Steam does not allow you to refund a year old product by default? This is borderline bait and switch especially after a year with no updates. Doesn't matter how well the map is done and what new was added. No one signed anything in the EULA that says another 3rd party can request to remove parts of a product.
  19. Where's the early A or A-6 AI?
  20. The surrounding area was much more detailed.
  21. Yeah what the actual? Imagine removing content from a map after a year. Where can we get Steam refunds?
  22. Yeah no, the loops are closed for that when radar isnt scanning. The simple fact why this is the case here is because ED simply faked/scripted this stuff with an arbitrary rate, with 0 actual procesing or scanning logic (raycasting). It's basically all afaked effect to make you think the redar is seeing false contacts. It doesnt even take into account the antenna angle or the altitude.
  23. I am aware but if you actually spent 2 minutes looking at them yourself you would know that those are esesntially the same. The SEP doesnt even have the correct back shape and extra angled UFP for that matter.
  24. But it will be fixed...as long as he said it, right? Right???
×
×
  • Create New...