Nu-NRG

Had this to, when I updated to 2.0.4 Erasing DCS from saved games and letting it re-create new one, worked for me!

Multiplayer?

Delivery methods you can check 476th videos. Operating in combined arms arms well, it's strictly multiplayer thing, but it sure makes things way interesting! I know, I've been on both sides :D For the CDU you have some nice videos by Recon Stewart, if that is what you need. Mission editor I'm no expert so I can't help you there. And yes I know what you mean by startup take off and land videos. Spam-o-Matic out there :D The thing is, that what you can do and learn in single player is just .. well .. this much and no more. And it feels stale. Once you know all that "stuff" and then bring that, along with some tactics in to multiplayer environment, it is then when things become way more interesting and FUN. OT: I feel like derailing thread, but at same time MasterZelgadis brought up a sweet topic! :D

Advanced topics, like what for example?

TGP stands for Targeting pod not search pod. Yes, they still fly heads out. Any kind of excesive heads down or fixation can lead to deadly consequences over battlefield. There are some scarry stories as to what can happen... Now days aided by HMCS. There is a famous quote: one look is worth a thousand radar scans.

Ahh I see. I dont have it either.

Thank you for your contribution to community!

What we need is points, flight plan, profiles/inv settings, SADL in multiplayer environment... aka proper DTC ... ED pwetty please? *sad puppy eyes*

Mavericks are not triggering MWS since 2.0 came out. They should tho, as they did in 1.2.x. Rife call when firing maverick should be made, not just because of dumping flare (might as well be radar guided - chaff), but rather the spooking of the flight as you go defensive and immediately switch from what ever you are doing to tracking threat in the direction. I can attest that SA-8, SA-19, SA-13, SA-18, SA-11 and AIM-9 trigger MWS. Those are the ones that I had experience with in past month. AN/AAR-47 is unable to distinguish friendly from foe missile. Due to it's nature it's also limited as to "till when" it's able to pick the missile. Also the way OSC's are placed you have a blind spot in forward sphere.

How about if you actually sign up with DYNDNS service of sort and use DN in auto connect?

I stand corrected on SOI acronym. Isn't that way I said?

Is it possible to make this for F-5? :D

There is no Air to Air HUD SPI SOI aka Sensor Object of Interest HUD Left MFCD Right MFCD SPI aka Sensor Point of Interest HUD (TDC primarily) STPT (currently selected one) TAD (hooked symbol) TGP (pointing at) AGM (pointing at) Note two underlined key words. Imagine the first one as object to manipulate/work with (zoom, polarity, exp, slew, etc ..) and the second as wanting to do something to that point (share, observe, destroy).. Layman terms .. and hopefully avoids confusion.

Do you have a picture of the chart?

You can bring it up and modify it in the waypoint page of the CDU. You can call it up by name or number.

Hey Ciribob! Couple of patches ago we stopped getting that beep beep beep sound when you turn on encrypted radio and silence it with PTT. Any idea what happened there?

@Tigercat & NoJoe There is nothing to set in DSMS for guns and rockets in terms of deliveries. Besides min alt. It comes down to - be in right position to turn in towards the target. Altitude, distance, speed. @Lalbatros For a CBU you would work your way backwards - from the target up. Ok, so we are using CBU-97. Now we want to know the effects - this will drive HOF. HOF among other things will drive your attack. It's practice .. As for numbers, they came from DAPS.

Was talking to PC-9 pilot couple of days ago. About visibility to! On a clear day ~7 miles seeing something is there, < 5 miles to start distinguishing it

Is it FN or is it Num? I have laptop here as well and I have a end/sysreq with FN and on numpad it's simply toggled by numlock.

Search is your friend. It's been reported and fix has been found. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=176814

Unfortunately for all of us, it's not the graphics setting. It's how DCS renders things. Jokingly inside the group one of our members tagged it with "New HMCS system that is in development". Fun intended :D

Tank putting his gun barrel on the aircraft? Gibberish. I have a hard time believing that any tank crew will put gun barrel on the aircraft and watching how the AGM 65 will hit it. I did see machine gun turret track your aircraft in DCS if that is what you meant :P You should pull off earlier as going over 3/9 line makes things shoot at you with rather nice precision. Also, it seems the pilot in question did not tell you why they practiced 60 degree dive on the tanks or you should ask him. 60 degree dive makes better penetration because it's coming from the top. Also, in the battle environment doing a e.g. 45 compared to 10 degree keeps you safer because it keeps you out of small arms fire and potentially MANPADs range.

Yardstick between wingman and you will only show distance and not bearing. It's 63 channels apart.

Aim-9 is there for self protection. You don't come unarmed in to a gunfight. They carry it in real life as well. For those, unseen or unpredicted situations. Also when ever they do not carry AIM-9 they do carry CAP-9 or AIS on that station (training).

Short answer is: wiring. The reliance on TGP amazes me :D Flying gentle/easy/steady over battlefield makes you a perfect SLAT You know how they say, practice makes perfect! What do you mean by that?