Jump to content

sirrah

Members
  • Posts

    4726
  • Joined

  • Last visited

5 Followers

About sirrah

  • Birthday 07/31/1981

Personal Information

  • Location
    Netherlands
  • Interests
    Well.... guess...
  • Occupation
    Lead Engineer Plant Design (former F-16A/B MLU mechanic)

Recent Profile Visitors

21357 profile views
  1. If you're referring to the YT video I'm guessing you are.. Without diving into the actual "discussion", or I'd rather say "reactions" from the community (which for obvious reasons will probably not be allowed on this forum); from what I've observed and without judging, the general consensus in reactions of the community after seeing this leaked video, are definitely not complaints about bugs or comparisons with BMS But until someone dares to post a link here to said YT video (I don't ) it's unsure if we are talking about the same video. (My expectations are, that this thread won't have a long life )
  2. Thanks for answering MAXsenna
  3. Do note that Earth curvature is not modeled in current DCS maps (the excessive transmitting range seems more like a bug or simply not simulated)
  4. In your OP you said "we need cold war trainers" I responded that perhaps you meant to say that "you" wish for additional trainers. I (and many community members with me) don't need any more cold war trainers in DCS and rather see the effort spend elsewhere. No forum rules broken as far as I can tell. Good luck with your wish mate
  5. Who do you mean by "we"? Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.
  6. Cool! (I also always judge performance by "feeling/experience" )
  7. Sounds/looks great Any noticable effect on performance? (unfortunately, life won't let me try for myself for a while)
  8. Now that you mention it, I'd far more fancy helo ops over land instead of sea. Lucky for us that the Lynx was used for both!
  9. Quite interesting stuff. It wouldn't be the first time Heatblur surprises me with the amount of technically accurate details they've put into their modules.
  10. Something like that did cross my mind (I didn't know it is activated by pushing the lever), but I use a hotas bind for the gear. So no mis clicking (I am however also using Pointctrl, so a miss click is never far away and could still be the cause)
  11. Can you maybe expand a bit on that please? (or can I read about that somewhere?)
  12. Hi @MAESTR0 Any chance you could treat us with some teaser WIP screenshots?
  13. sirrah

    Little rant

    Hehe I totally get your frustration. It's like all normal polite behavior, goes down the drain as soon as people set foot in the magically digital world called "internet". Just let it slide.. There's plenty of stuff in life worth getting agitated about, this isn't one of them.
  14. Sorry up front, I forgot to save the track file But perhaps anyone else had this issue, perhaps it is a known problem in the F-4 (feature), or maybe even a known bug? I was doing some training touch-and-gos the other day at Ramstein AB. I was properly in the flow and Jester praised me every single time But.. After my 4th touch-and-go, I couldn't raise my landing gear. I was able to flip the landing gear lever, but nothing happened. I tried landing and taking off again, but still it stayed down. Any ideas on what might have caused this? I can imagine something like this could happen after a hard landing, but they were all pretty smooth (really, you can ask Jester)
  15. I'd certainly fancy a Westland Lynx (surely there's a place in DCS for the world's "fastest" helo)(also, DCS could do with some more non-US western modules) But I'd definitely also buy the CH-53 if it were available. With the Hook and Herc, DCS is focussing more and more on cargo hauling in their sim, so the Stallion would be a great addition in that respect
×
×
  • Create New...