sirrah

Or maybe just start with optional brighter director lights on the tanker. (I know they are quite dim irl, but everything is better than immersion breaking overlays imho)

Ah ok, I missed that feature somehow Nice

If I understand it correctly, the OP wants to have the infantry already embarked on mission start. I don't think this is possible. Perhaps with scripting it is, but maybe someone else can chime in on that.

Having just one Dutch (Volkel) and one Belgium (Kleine Brogel) airbase modeled, would already have me insta buy this map. Even if the scenery around those bases is just modeled generically and basic.

Ah yes tnx (I did check the FAQ post, but somehow missed that interactive map)

Sorry if answered somewhere in this or another thread, but did ED give any clarity on what we can still expect for the North part of the map in terms of additional scenery detail? (I'm not asking for an ETA, as I've been here long enough to know we won't get that ) I was kinda surprised to just discover that Mosul Int. Airport (Camp Diamondback and FOB Merez) hasn't been modeled yet.

Came here to ask the same. "In order to follow our DCS updates..."? What does this mean? Anyone?

@BIGNEWY or @NineLine, please ask the website developer to add Iraq to the user files section. (and while at it, please also ask him/her to include this to the "new-module-release-checklist", so that the community doesn't have to ask for this with each new module release...)

Very nice YT channel this one: https://youtube.com/@cider-c?si=b6_x4GyY5yOAzvP_ (Radio comms included and no cheesy background music)

Sorry if posted here before, but for those interested in the Cold War era, go check out this documentary: "Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War" https://m.imdb.com/title/tt26227818/ (Watching it on Netflix myself)

Wonder if it's also possible to just use a finger on the touch screen to select and/or lock something. Using a slew control on the throttle seems like a lot more unnecessary fiddling around and waste of time. But I suppose we'll probably not know for sure for quite some time.. Given all this stuff being classified as it is.

C'mon Nineline, nobody's expecting 100% 1:1 modules. The concerns expressed in this thread, are that this F-35 will be like >90% made up. I don't think it's fair to just do as if all existing DCS modules are similarly "made up" purely from videos and assumptions. This is a unique move ED is making here with DCS. Is it truly so strange that some dedicated community members have some concerns? Please don't just put us away as negative nay sayers.. we just care for DCS