Yellonet

I have the same problem, and the RWR worked fine for me in beta 1.

Do they reload at all?

Aha... so the JTAC can automatically see what you have on board?

...after or before you tell him that you're "out"?

I really though I had it, good angle, speed, rate of decent... :doh: Carrier landing.trk

Currently it looks like this But I used to have this on my desktop :yes:

Unless the first "item" is a prerequisite for the next, then we'd need the computer to make the correct settings for us in order to be able to skip ahead.

Yep, those are the ones, they might not be practical for regular use, but they're good for landing challenges and emergencies :)

Nice. But no mention of the two Kutaisi airfields?

India / Pakistan, very varied terrain and it's a "hot" territory and as such a good base for realistic campaigns, also we would have MiG-29 vs. F-16 that many people would like to see.

Completely agree.

I think Frostie ment the other "eating" ;)

The sound that might be missing is a kind of grinding/scraping metal noise, there's quite a lot of mechanical sound from the gun as can be heard in the first video.

At least you didn't put honesty and fighterops in the same sentence. But frankly the sentences next to each other are bad enough :noexpression:

The fulda gap scenario is quite unlikely nowadays, the 'A' was primarily a flying tank destroyer, the 'C' is more of a general CAS aircraft. The A-10C is a more modern aircraft as much due to its role as its capabilities.

Hmmm.... I'm kind of thinking that I'll do this at work :shifty:

Not entirely on topic but as I feel I've missed out by not having TrackIR I just ordered a TrackIR 5 + pro clip - when she was out of the room of course. Now I'm just hoping that when it arrives she'll assume that such a small thing is a lot cheaper than it actually is :music_whistling:

Yes. Perhaps. Maybe.... :suspect:

I want to know too... I would have thought the current version was pretty accurately modeled.

As long as it's realistic and accurate simulates the real deal I'm happy. I just thought that how it is was as it should.

Actually I was content with how it was, I thought that the zoom was just digital after you use that first optical zoom, and if so that would explain the blur as digital zoom sacrifices resolution.

Sure it will run, maybe not max settings but medium should be ok I think.

Omigosh, ED loves ST too, it's too good to be true :cry: :thumbup:

Sounds like rocket jumping adapted to simulators :) Not really sure if it works though...

Thanks, I guess I should have checked there... :idiot: