Looking forward to the MiG-19P.......but this kind of info does beg the question,why RAZBAM decided to model the 'P' and not the 'S'.
In most Theatres of combat in the 20th Century it was the 'S' model,that was commonly used,and not the 'P'.The manual available to model the MiG-19 on,or to gather data from,was on the 'S' model.
So one can only ask why the 'P' ?.....I am genuinely intrigued.I am in no way criticising their decision,just making an observation of the thought process behind it.
However,I hope a future update will incorporate the 'S',that will be warmly appreciated.