DaveRindner

For fact, A-10C can target and sink Molnya and Grisha with AGM-65G. Smaller AGM-65 will damage ships, but won't sink them. Anything bigger then a Grisha, will not be sunk by 65G and will likely shoot down A-10. In my trial, I have sunk Elnya replenishment ship with AGM-65G, MK-82 bombs, and a really long cannon burst.

Same here. X55 Rhino axis do not work in F-15C. Something went terribly wrong with this update. A-10C crashes on cold start, F-15C axis don't work at all. Nosewheel steering on SU-25T do not work after landing, and front tire on T bursts upon landing and on takeoff roll above 270 kph. ALL Modueles have reduced FPS. Urgent fix or rollback is needed!

Got it! Thank you. I was not releasing properly under CCRP.

Help me out here, what should I be seeing , symbology wise, on HUD prior to release.

Perhaps I am missing something in deployment of LGB. The target is locked with pod in PointTrack mode, AC is 10,000 or higher. Weapon is released in CCRP mode. The laser illuminates target , but weapon does not guide. Not even close.

DCS does need F-16C module. Dynamics of F-16 are pretty well known, so having accurate flight model with accurate FBW Laws, and Advanced Systems Modeling, would probably not infringe on any classified data. But the radar in Block 50 and highter, ECM, radios,and NATO Link16 are kind of classified. SniperXR tgt pod is also classified. How AIM-9X works with radar and JHMQS is also classified. AIM-120C(8/9) and higher are way more capable in real life then what is modeled in AIM-120C by DCS. Older (1989-1990) Desert Storm era Block40/42 or even classic 1980's Block 30 with APG-63 and Lantirn could be doable.

Within context of DCS. A-10C is easy to fly, and easy to land.A little more practice is required for instrument ILS approach and landing. I find inFlight refueling is quite difficult, I have hard time stabilizing the aircraft with respect to refueling boom. The most technically demanding task is managing targeting pod and CDU, with weapons employment. But it is learnable.

Appears that scraping burner cans of SU-33 explodes the aircraft.

I am almost embarrassed to ask. What is the status of Kuznetzov's OLS fresnel lens?

MH-53E SeaStallion. Please O'Lord it be HFiveThree

IS the damage model in DCS 1.5.6 FC3 so sensitive that scraping burner cans on touchdown would completely destroy air craft, as in CFIT?

Gaudata, Nalchik, Mozdok, and Suchumi. I think its on all of them.

MIG-29A is affected likewise. Two issues I tested with and both have not been explanatory. 1. Gross weight on touchdown. I thought that having too much fuel on landing was issue. So I tried landing with fuel between 500 and 1000. Basically between critical and low fuel state, and no weapons. No good. Even VV of 1-2ms causes explosion right after the wheel touchdown squeak is heard. 2. Sideslip on touchdown. Even straight down centerline of runway causes explosion. Looks like excessively strict limits on Mig-29 landing have crept in. I have no problems on take off.

Hapilly SU-27 flies and lands just fine. The blown tires issue , IMHO, is a realistic effect. Do not exceed takeoff speed of 290 kph for more then two seconds. Do not exceed max braking for more then two seconds. On departure rotate around 240-250 kph. Do not exceed 3 meters/s VV on touchdown, and do not exceed 290 kph on touchdown. 270 kph touchdown works great with 2 m/s VV.

MIG-29S keeps exploding upon touchdown, regardless of VV. Started in 1.5.6 that just got patched.

Has anyone got to use new version of X56 Rhino (blue model) with DCS? If so how is it? I have older black version , and its not so great. Older models Zaxis(rudder) has sticktion and inaccuracy that no amount of silicon grease can solve.

Whats this A-4K from Viper Never heard of them.

I have MIG-21 BiS. So I am expecting same flight fidelity from Viggrn. In the mean time , when will Viggen be in DCS 1.5.5 as non-flyable aircraft, and how close would the ai controlled capabilities be to the flyable model? F-5, Viggen, Mig-21Bis, UH-1H, MI-8, Mirage 5-2000C, F/A-18C, A-10C (without pod and GPS embedded INS , is an A model). All thse are high fidelity flight models and systems modeling. Its like we are simming in late 1980's - late 1990's End Cold War/Post Cold War period prior to GWOT. I like it, those were good times for me, being GenXer. Now we need F-16C Block 50, and MIG-29SMT( fully simmed and sytemed MIG-29C), and fully simmed and systemed SU-27BM, AH-1W(USMC and US Army National Guard), and we got ourselves a decent set of period systems. Really would like to see Baltic campaign set in 1993 - 1995 context. Don't know if anyone cares, but I would love following modules. A-4M, Sepecat Jaguar, Tornado GR-4(UK and German Kriegsmarine), and AV-8B sim!!!!. Especcially Harrier!

Thank you. Solved. But DCS is not so great when panels are of different size. DCS needs panel editor built in so 2nd panel can be used for LCD and instrument display.

I have two panels Panel #1 is 1920X1080 Panel #2 is 2540X1440 set as primary monitor. I experimentally changed resolution to 4480 X 1080 Now the top of screen is gone and I cannot change the screen rez back becouse I cannot see the little gear icon. Which of the LUA files controles screen rez?

A-4EVER

None of the above. The project should be A-4 Skyhawk A-4, A-4 A-4EVER!

Vray , Arnold, Octane. Which renderer was used?

No nighttime work. Everything is done in bright sunny day.

Hi fidelity MIG-29M2 or K with PFM and ASM would be most welcome. At least by me. Along with F-16C/D Block50/52.