Jump to content

WRAITH

Members
  • Posts

    660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by WRAITH

  1. + 100.000.000 here:smilewink::joystick::pilotfly: The F-16 Fighting Falcon is a Superior and proven Fighter the Best in modern combat Dying to See a DCS version of F4 all the F4 World we come running here with pleasure and a multitude of thanks. Read here http://defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/feature-advanced-f-16.htm The Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon .......... Forever Baby!:thumbup:
  2. As long as the 51D is present which actaully means (51 years stuck in a (D)og pen) This is the Jet age F-16 and F18 with the (F/A) acronym in it a multirole Attack Fighter... USAF POWER! Simple really! When things are like.... They told us.... they forgot to tell us...oh boy that sounds like trouble for both parties involved...:doh: I just hope its not a parallel universe of the original release of FSX. Please time warp me back in time or .... Back to the Future.... hahahahaha LoL
  3. Hi Azazel, Exactly, You know this discussion has been discussed in BMS Forums, and still the BMS Devs manage to have several F-16 variants in different Theaters and F-16A and the Janhas D model is on the way also its development. Just check the Community Mods/WIP Thread its awesome! I just hope DCS does the same thing also with an F-18 for carrier ops and some other nice Jets like the JAS 39 Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, Harrier GR9, Typhoon, Mirage 2000C / III, Tornado, SU-35BM, SU-37 Terminator, B2 Spirit, B1B Lancer etc all the good ones but F-16 is a must. Well time will tell. Right! The F-16D is also in development so its not that it cant be done but some just resist. I'm personally encouraging more combat sims to be produced its time, all this new tech we have these days LCD 3D HD Screens etc awesome good time to get back into combat sims. Just cant stand the niggling typical argumentative types knocking down every ounce of hope and creativity thats put out and voiced to actually better the sims to get more outa of them, to many people get lost in the detail. No wonder people say, "The Devil is in the detail"! LoL Its not that the dream cant be achieved just needs confirmation and a "YES WE CAN ATTITUDE"! Its always going to be a WIP effort like most sims anyway I guess. Time is the essence of things hoped for and where dreams are inspired! Me Still, Hoping for the Best :thumbup:
  4. Hi fella's, If I may, share my personal view and discuss it freely and not meaning to start a flame war. F4 was designed with real air force input found here http://www.combatsim.com/review.php?id=57 as I have explained in above posts which really is a treat and something for DCS to really think about moving forward and not wish the whole thing away just becoming another FSX which I enjoyed for a while and now its wasted space on my HD. Sorry, but thats true for a majority even among real life commercial pilots, the sim was a joke I mean the original release not current work with FSX allot has been fixed and modded with 3rd parties but you would have spent a good $500 or more to get it where it should have been, anyway beside the point. But still something to consider and treat seriously many guys I speak to simply dont bother with FSX or MS Flight but prefer Xplane10 flying 747 and A380's but no combat simulation, anyway thats move on. I read the whole thread again carefully, sure I completely understand and this is not BMS or FF here, but never the less Combat Sims are awesome and not many want to take the F4 path because it is a challenge and is very different from an editor even thou I dont know about coding or am I a Dev but I have read and studied all that there is out there on F4 and the principles that F4 is built upon is awesome and a treasure. What surprises me though Microprose could do it, Free Falcon does it and BMS is doing it, so then why cant DCS do it as a commercial line. Okay I see where this might go and the heated debates and all that, but thats not my intent or what I am trying to do or say, just that it is worth it in the end to do it. Meaning reviving the F4 concept found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_4.0 and developing the F4 concept into DCS is vital for a combat sim and I tell you right away you would be thanked over a million times and those who follow F4 would not shy from purchasing and supporting DCS products even further to support the effort. So once DCS has grasped onto the whole engine thing and developed several theaters in different time lines with many options and benefits like relevant Air Craft and war scenarios etc etc it would have a solid founding to which continue and maybe share that with 3rd parties for a whole line of theaters like PMC more info here http://tactical.nekromantix.com/f4/falcon-4-pmc-theaters.php The theaters I have in mind as suggestions personally I repeat would be Korea, Balkans, Afghanistan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Iraq, Israel, Iran, Russia and Japan all with Dynamic War Campaigns and with many benefits and treats in each one. I kinda feel like many thou it just will never happen, which is sad because now we have all this new tech I mean look at this guy...WATCH WoW nice...ha With HD 3D screens and multicore GFX and Intel i7 processors oh boy you can have a real ball with combat sims now days its not the 486 days anymore its full on now, love it. I'm still using original release of DCS-A10 and LockOn because stuck with Windows XP Pro 32bit not for long thou getting Windows 7 and some upgrades soon. Anyways I hope for the best :thumbup:
  5. Hi, I read your reply, thanks for your opinion and support I was feeling lonely and ignored here ....... LoL Great to have guys like you, the F-16 is a renown fighter a good long 40 years now serving fighter A-10 is good but its no comparison to the F-16's and beloved F-18's in its many variants and there is plenty of information on both as they are really good for a sim combat experience being both multirole fighters in A-G and A-A specialization thats why I made this thread... http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1480778&postcount=19 Please respect it and use it for reference and study its not a childish attempt to place videos and get all googly about its a reference as to why its a good model for DCS series along with the F-18 if you guys like I post more videos and info on the F-18's. In real life the F-16 has been tried and tested in real battle and statics prove its a proven multirole fighter. F-16 Read more here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16_Fighting_Falcon F-18 Read more here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F/A-18_Hornet Now with upgrades to a new F-16V just released this year 2012 its up to par with JSF F-35 and F-22 etc capability as a modern multirole fighter and yet much secrecy on updates and performance made to it. I dont know why people in Combat Sim world dont act on this with a Falcon 4.0 concept which stirs me up passionately more info here http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1475896&postcount=688 I'm further encouraging this because its damn good, and DCS would thrive if there was any release news on this, seriously now! We are talking about "Combat Study Simulation" here right! Well I can only hope and trust that someone with talent is reading this and agreeing with us F4 followers and saying damn right it really is a remarkable jet with an awesome F4 concept effort. It will always be the GODFATHER of Combat Sims it just needs a NEW HOME and NEW LOOK for 2012 and beyond ... time to redesign and market F4 again even if its with a different name who cares not into names just the guts of it! :thumbup: Any body listening...... Please give us news on this that its in development.......
  6. not dumb to that either:helpsmilie: Forgive me 100.000.000 *10/2 Please "FORUMS":doh: LoL
  7. You gota fish info some way around forums lol Its what this smile is about Its all Lock and Key Doh! :megalol:
  8. Okay great an announcement is on the way....kool Thank you very much
  9. Well look Up see below the DCS label pics see what I mean
  10. Yeah I know bud I did read it took me a while but no real hard facts and no formal thread discussing it so bud your outa place since this is a Wishlist thread, just pointing that out to ya;)
  11. Hi any further news, dev input or discussion on this would be appreciated thanks. :thumbup: :smartass: :joystick:
  12. :megalol:LOOOOOOOOL I cant stop cracking up........ Fantastic catch its perfect its an act of a genius... hahahahaha
  13. Hi I will back you up on that more realism just like in carrier ops, watch FSX Super Bug Carrier Ops Nice http://youtu.be/X8uTw0efsGY?hd=1 Also these real life ops to reference from http://youtu.be/yqEYm-Z6bcA REALISM Damn nice, can you imagine..... I will never leave home LoL.
  14. Oh, I forgot...... What is DCS.....A Combat Sim with F-18 Carrier Ops :pilotfly: Realism.... Anything else is just a game..... goto here for games....http://au.ign.com/ No kool-aid here ..... :lock: :smilewink: :D LoL Thanks :thumbup:
  15. Hi well we hope so I guess thats what this thread is all about http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=89885 As long as we dont get a running list of crap FM models like the original release of FSX not the recent work and 3rd party stuff the original release I'm talking about, I will be happy if DCS continue a high standard good price and regular updates and add-ons on the whole concept of a Combat Flight sim similar if not better than Falcon 4.0 or BMS meaning simply taking a combat sim like DCS well into a good future of combat sims, simply a pleasure to study and fly accurate and realistic hi-fidelity modeling of the aerial War experience. So in the world of want and needs and fixes ... LoL... all I want is a F/A-18E/F and F-16 Block 50/52 variants .... Please :smilewink: F/A-18E/F F-16 Block 50/52 Beautiful aren't they! Hoping for the best :thumbup:
  16. Hi this thread its gone off topic a bit but its basically an F-16 FM request discussion. If more than one variant can be made which wouldn't be that hard you have the base and calculations for one F-16 FM and adjust minor differences for others. I'm no coder or dev but once you establish a base it should be fairly smooth and easy to have some variants F-16AM, F-16C, F-16i, F-16CD, F-16CJ or another way to put it is a Block 15 then just a Block 50/52 as an example If F4 Devs can accomplish this certainly DCS can make the dream right, seriously these guys do it full-time and a bigger team than F4 teams. This would be the same for other A/C's like F-4, F-14, F-15, F-18..... SU's..... Migs..... and so on Well its just me thinking out loud anyway. I'm still hoping for the best............................:thumbup:
  17. Hi all, I completely understand what this thread is about although the reason for this Forum is an "Aerial Combat Simulator", I would say we are feeling kinda worried that we simply wont get what is quoted just above and with many links to what we are here for that is what needs clearing up. "WE ARE COMBAT SIMMERS HERE PRIMARILY FOR THAT", produce that first we pay fair price then all other fun stuff, is okay with us since DCS is a business and any revenue would be to make profit and sustain itself, just as long as we customers get what we want to buy or else the target audience is missed. The future of DCS is "Aerial Combat Sims", but my strong opinion is develop it from the "F4 Concept of what is a Combat Flight Sim with many A/C's on offer and improve on overall product! My view is post a "5 Year Development Plan and Direction of DCS", so we are all on the same page a short post with vague statements isn't clear enough. Best free market consultation advice you get here, click on links in quote! Enjoy Folks! Me still hoping for the best :thumbup:
  18. Well to keep up with modern appearances F-16 Block 50/52 is the best AESA Radar, FCLS, HUD, better avionics updates, JHMCS capable, data link, better weapons loadout and so on. Please watch http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com.au/2009/10/f-16-block-5052-explained.html http://www.military-heat.com/52/lockheed-martin-f16-block-505260/ Da best :thumbup:
  19. Well then the "GRAND SLAM Mother BOMB" is coming So this will be me then on the choo choo's watch LoL.......:lol:
  20. Well all I'm going to say is that once I'm in my F-18 and F-16 and if I see on my A-G radar a choo choo or if I see over my shoulder or thru the canopy or on my RWR a propy planey I'm going to eject and land on the pointiest tree to end the nightmare........:D So as it says it better be beyond my future...... because I do wanna fly my beloved JETS.....LoL :doh: Ah, unless, I pickle off multiple Aim 9x's with a B61 or multiple CBU's in sheer frustration still deciding........ its painful. LoL
  21. All I'm going to say is - "HiFi STUDY COMBAT FLIGHT SIMULATOR" ........ PLEASE!:joystick::pilotfly::smartass: EDIT- Why, cause I want to learn to fly many types of HiFi A/C's preferably F-16 / F18's variants in different Theaters with Dynamic War Campaigns .................. ........ never getting bored! :joystick: :smilewink: :thumbup:
  22. Hi fantastic a celebration it is for F4 followers Love it thanks :smilewink::thumbup:
  23. PLEASE WATCH THE Fighting Falcon - The VIPER is Sacred....... LoL http://youtu.be/rOb79JrcNY0 http://youtu.be/KE4yG5qjWMA?hd=1 F-16 FCLS F-16 AESA RADAR F-16 Jammer POD http://youtu.be/bSJDUABpXzI F-16 SNIPER POD http://youtu.be/mTFcmlbn1GQ http://youtu.be/mpPudL-Ztdg?hd=1 Falcon 4.0 http://youtu.be/OCFMX5z-ed4http://youtu.be/hPNnXAKHDsE?hd=1 http://youtu.be/26k1LxYaAkc?hd=1 The F-16 BEST MULTIROLE FIGHTER THEN IN SECOND PLACE IS THE F/A-18E/F Super Hornet! I can post more on the F-18 if you like gents, I have a whole collection of video downloads from youtube dont be afraid to ask. Flight Sims, Da best!.................... :thumbup:
  24. Well watch http://youtu.be/hgw9DlIK8DY?hd=1 Cryengine more here http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1480392&postcount=5442 Awesome :smilewink::thumbup:
  25. The grass and terrain in ARMAII is not bad what you all think Watch And FPS and quality is good
×
×
  • Create New...