ENO

Description: A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows. Problem signature: Problem Event Name: AppHangB1 Application Name: DCS.exe Application Version: 1.2.8.27915 Application Timestamp: 537df6ef Hang Signature: ecd2 Hang Type: 0 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3 Locale ID: 4105 Additional Hang Signature 1: ecd265f48e07091f29ab80f8b423c13f Additional Hang Signature 2: 3520 Additional Hang Signature 3: 3520cc233adf4c2548b4e227d538d845 Additional Hang Signature 4: ecd2 Additional Hang Signature 5: ecd265f48e07091f29ab80f8b423c13f Additional Hang Signature 6: 3520 Additional Hang Signature 7: 3520cc233adf4c2548b4e227d538d845 Looks like a MIST error again... this is with 3.3a though... EDIT: Oops- went in and looked and it was running 3.3 only... so we can probably disregard this one- I'll leave it up just in case. crash 06.06.14.zip

These two missions crash consistently and I have no clue why... with SLMOD on and off... they both crater. Can someone take a stab at it? These are the missions associated to the dcs logs attached in previous posts. I don't think Killbox even generates crash logs- Anyway. I'd really appreciate some insights here since they're two of my favourites. Eno's Hosta La Kudepsta, Sochi 1.2.8.a.miz Eno's Killbox.1.2.8.a.miz

I read that in a lot of aviation style books as well and sort of understood what it meant- but that really clears it up. Thanks eddie.

I was using the same originally- I hadn't ever heard of ++ Notepad ++ is a fantastic tool that maintains syntax and minimizes the discomfort of change. I just "open with" and "set as default" to notepad ++ and the switch was seamless but the benefits are undeniable. give it a try!

You using just notepad or notepad ++?

Okay, I'll field this one. Feedback is important to you- so... by that how about I go into every available multiplayer server right now and deliver feedback: I don't like how this aircraft is set up, I want it set up with weapons when I come in, why not any warm starts... why are there air starts? I want cold starts... but I want them in a prepared pit... and I want it more realistic so that radio channels aren't just xxx.0. And, while we're at it... why can't I see from outside? Half of why I sim is for the eye candy... but what about his unrealistic mission? Why are we hunting ONLY AAA? Why is there a carrier? There wouldn't ever be a carrier in this part of the world... A-10C isn't a SEAD aircraft. Why are there so many missiles? Why are the missions to easy? Why are there no missiles? Why do you ambush with MANPADS? Why are there same aircraft on both sides... that gets confusing... but I'm always bored of fighting the same enemies... I'm tired of cheaters- why is there no balance? I get bored if I have to fly more than 15 minutes in one direction to get shot down and cold start again? Why not have positions available in the event a person is shot down so they can respawn in a warm pit? I've actually heard every single one of these things from different people- believe me. One more guy coming in here b1tching about how the mission doesn't line up particularly with his taste is NOT contributing or valuable. If guys are in looking for ideas- go on in. Deliver input. If it isn't requested- then maybe be a little more aware of the fact that it may not even be welcomed. Or it's already beaten to death. Focus on the latter. The reasons those missions exist, and I can say this from experience, is that the people it was made for were a certain group of simmers who talked to a mission maker who tried it out. Maybe the guy made it for himself and forgot to lock it. Maybe They left the door open for people who were of similar mind to come and join in. For everyone else- who had ambitions to fly to a different tune... believe me- I'm sure they know where the exit button is. And it's not right next to a "feedback" button- Just because somebody left doesn't mean it's an open door for open commentary and opinion on how it all could have been done better and how that particular mission maker- whoever it was- did anything wrong. Forums are a place to express opinions. Okay- so someone experienced something they didn't like. I have an idea... how about I come in here and openly just talk about how crappy everyone is doing and then walk away and let them swim in it for awhile. Actually- how about I just go ahead and skip the mission part and focus on this thread. Who cares? It's just my opinion and just like the next person I'm entitled to smear it wherever I choose. Unfortunately, on the opposite end of that entitlement, the people who are feeling like that person should go ahead and spend a few hundred hours building missions (that constantly break) to entertain an MP community of people who are in VERY short supply right now are equally entitled. I can sit here and shoot down these opinions scatter-gun style since it is my opinion that people who are so full of fantastic ideas to make things better can sit down like the rest of us and spend some time demonstrating it. Yes... Now that you mention it... What every mission maker in here needs is more feedback like that. So please, by all means- carry on helping the mission making community.

Not sure if I'll be able to use it but I have to say it's impressive!

One more guy in here whining that mission builders don't make missions to their specific preference? Yeah... enjoy. I've had my fill of whiners who do nothing but take and give nothing.

^ Right?!

Tell you what Falcon- if you have such tremendous insight then I encourage you to invest some of it in the creation of your own missions. Frick I get tired of these threads.

Problem signature: Problem Event Name: BEX64 Application Name: DCS.exe Application Version: 1.2.8.27915 Application Timestamp: 537df6ef Fault Module Name: StackHash_1758 Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000 Exception Offset: 000064656b636f6c Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Data: 0000000000000008 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3 Locale ID: 4105 Additional Information 1: 1758 Additional Information 2: 1758bf567dd558b37438658eb9a55d14 Additional Information 3: 7b84 Additional Information 4: 7b84150655443719d797793f39b4b59a Wow- that didn't take long. crash 06.05.14 2.zip

I think if you're going to continue to use MIST, you NEED to update it to the 3.3a (for those missions that use MIST- that is.)

Description: A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows. Problem signature: Problem Event Name: AppHangB1 Application Name: DCS.exe Application Version: 1.2.8.27915 Application Timestamp: 537df6ef Hang Signature: 9e63 Hang Type: 0 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3 Locale ID: 4105 Additional Hang Signature 1: 9e6358afdd07108c6993f355eac02e56 Additional Hang Signature 2: 21fc Additional Hang Signature 3: 21fce8bab4dd6af8f74bb023125e679c Additional Hang Signature 4: 9e63 Additional Hang Signature 5: 9e6358afdd07108c6993f355eac02e56 Additional Hang Signature 6: 21fc Additional Hang Signature 7: 21fce8bab4dd6af8f74bb023125e679c You know what- this was a mission that was crashing before... for no reason I can figure out (called Eno's Killbox.) I forgot you wanted the other mission (Hosta La Kudepsta, Sochi!) I'll run that one next. crash 06.05.14.zip

Thought it was S6 on the RWR. http://wiki.hoggit.us/view/RWR

^ This.

Holy cow Ajax... nice work (again!) It took me a couple of times to read through it to realize what each thing signified as a mission editor- but yes, so many of those things are convenience items that I've just learned to work through. I'm sure it'll take me a couple times in the ME to fully appreciate these functions- Anything else in the Mission Editor Wishlist that you're plugging away at (other than the change coalition feature you mentioned- which, btw, would be enormously helpful).

I'm sure someone can answer more completely- but think of it this way... If you have a script that requires MIST to function properly, then logically you would need MIST to load sooner. Sometimes you need a few seconds for MIST to load, and then for the script to load. Most of my scripts are loaded on a "time more 10" condition to give MIST a chance to load. An exception to this rule might be if the script doesn't have a reason to trigger (ie: a unit is not in a designated zone- or you don't want it to track units until later on in the mission) then it won't necessarily cause an error. You can load the script on a different condition later on... they don't all need to be dog piled into the mission at once. I always recalled CTTS needing to be loaded by initialization (at the bottom) and my setup currently runs with CTTS loaded then, and MIST loaded at start. I was corrected on this recently- but this has not caused me any issues. As for the other scripts- I don't think they'll necessarily conflict with one another provided the script functions found within base scripts (like MIST) are already loaded. As long as those are loaded, you should be able to bring your other various scripts online thereafter... (time more 10-12 is a time that has worked for me).

I'm sure I owed you a few ;)

options.graphics.maxfps = 30 options.graphics.render3D = false options.graphics.ScreenshotQuality = 90 these are my settings.

It better, if they're going to be showcasing their wares at E3. Kind of embarrassing to have a thousand tons of abrams tanks stacked on top of each other in a 10 story tall pile on top of a bridge. Would look pretty cool with Oculus Rift though, I'll bet...

Worth a try. I was getting errors on other missions with unit related scripts

Yeah- Ajax was mentioning there were quite a few SLMOD errors in one of my last reports too. Unfortunately he hasn't had a lot of time to dig into it... but it would be nice if someone could take a look and sort out what happened?

Are you running the modified MIST 3.3a?

It needs a graphics card... of ANY caliber. Slap some 4-5 year old card in there? I've got a 260 in mine and it's MASSIVE overkill.

LAN instructions are completely useless since 127. People need to stop suggesting this. 1024 is generally sufficient unless there is a high AI content in which case 2048 is the HIGHEST setting recommended.