Prowler111

I have to enforce the fact that "regular upgrades" means adding new stuff to it (like the S version) not that something is missing from the final product

1.- Its being done, in fact there is a video around showing some fixes 2.- Most 3d work is ready, i decided (against myself, go figure) to post no pics in order to avoid unnecessary hype since it's not in current development stream 3.- MiG-19 is around the corner, I decided to release it as a full module, no early access BUT with regular upgrades and the usual bug killing due to DCSW normal evolution, if it wasn't for this decision, it would've been available a few weeks ago.

Let's see what happens in our next batch of projects, as it is we are completely full and that includes flyable assets for the Falklands/Malvinas map. Like i said from the beginning, our targeted A-4 is the A-4M Skyhawk II used by the USMC, which currently is not scheduled to be included in our current development "assembly" line.

Nice try, i wont bite...

DCS suffered new core changes, it's taking longer than expected to add new stuff and to prevent others to get broken, sorry for falling behind on this.

You have to keep in mind this is in the 1982 conflict context, and also, most definitely, is not around the corner, the reason for this poll is since we are starting to schedule all this HUGE task, we wanted to know what you all think, i can hardly see us making both versions, at least not in a row or even worse in the mid term, sorry but it is how it is....

Nothing i can comment freely

I'm sorry, your statement is completely wrong But at the end of the day, we are developing a MiG-23 MLA!

Tarawa Parking WIP

Will take a look at it ALSO, with latest ED update, choppers now take off properly (AI), not sure when it will show in the LHA-1

Just to rest you assured on 2 subjects: Bronco..there was a thread around here, i posted my answer there. Pucara..we are developing a South Atlantic terrain, there will be Pucaras.. About the O-2 Killing the OV-10..well, it's pretty much like when the AV-8B Plus is available it will most likely kill the AV-8B NA, but then again, you'll have both choices.

A well...to be honest, i wasn't aware of this. Cubanace, thanks, it's a poll on a may or may NOT be project in a future, as usual, i always ask the community. Of course none of this have an impact on current developments

It's a very thin line

I would really like to know about this, since if so, its a coincidence

Simple question O-2A Skymaster in DCS?

Some stuff really is out of our hands, but we know ED is working on a solution

Currently we have like 3 able 3d meshes ready for production( 3 Helicopters, 2 heavy 1 mid), but our production line is stretched as it is, and i don't want it to be too thin, once the pertinent development depts are ready, you'll start to see some helo production, when? i can't tell with a certain date, but in the mid term, sure...

This is an ED issue

night ops

Gents: Welcome to our new website and online store If you're already a customer, all your info is there and has not been changed. Hope you like it! https://www.razbamsimulations.com/

There will be one at the end of the development

Do 2 seaters were ever used in combat?

I can tell you from a 1st person experience, the AdA actual pilots of the Mirage 2000C actual complain is about something NO ONE complained (I wont say it, leave that to DCS M2000C experts) and the complain is about the procedure we used instead of it's functionality. And about some other complains by the community? well, some stuff (switches) in the cockpit are not even pilot intended but ground crew intended, and yes, the complain is about those not being implemented. About Harrier functionality, did you know that the NATOPS/manual hanging around freely in the internet actually has almost NOTHING to do with the version we did for DCS? it's mostly DAY ATTACK version (phased out long time ago) but only a REAL USMC AV-8B pilot can tell, so the so called Harrier Bible being used in RAZBAM inquisition is actually..well...obsolete. We do know since we do have real, very much in active, AV-8B pilots testing the module. And now about bugs, functionality and stuff "unfinished", DCS is a continuously evolving simulation, some stuff is "there" some stuff is simply "not there" yet and some is there but not fully implemented until the next iteration of DCS arrives, the most notorious might be A/G radar, some thing work today, tomorrow they wont (hence the coming and going bugs), we take the blame and find the solution (because something was changed in the code) but the bottom line is that this means that DCS is alive, always changing and evolving and we have to deal with it and constantly adapting, that's why we keep working with the M2000C (which is officially complete) and the Harrier being finished up. I love DCS, love the development mechanics behind it and i praise Eagle Dynamics for what they are doing. F-15E is a go, Mig-23 is a go, A-29 is a go, and some others that i simply can't talk freely due to my OWN policies. It has been said and explained ad nauseam our work flow, there is a very capable team, in all fronts. I could fill pages with tech stuff taken from the real world, pictures and stuff and explain to you how it works...in real life, but this is not REAL aircraft development, nor actual avionics or flight instruments, while in real world you have to work with navigational algorithms, in software development is as clear as if alingnementTime <= 4 then Pos = Pos + random; else Pos = Pos(this is not an actual code line) and then the DCS engine handles the rest, this is where we have to work hand in hand with ED(which is phenomenal in this department) . But these lines of code are not going to write themselves, it has to be done manually and that takes time (hence our silence), yes silence means we are working. So there you have it, I'm telling you what most are not willing to tell you, but those in the know (and i know there are software developers being DCS fans) know exactly what i mean. Now i will step down from this soap box and be quiet again, since there is a lot happening and yes, some of these guys actually work in Sundays. Best regards Ron Zambrano RAZBAM Simulations, LLC Owner & Founder

The A-29 project is healthy as ever There are some delays (unexpected), not only from the developer's personal level, but the aircraft itself (as you know, A-29 are fairly new), since it's an active duty bird

All in due time