REPUBLICANO

The most realistic of all them is the Mig-23ML and the Su-22M4. I would take the Mig-23ML Make a variable-geometry fighter Could be a hard but interesting project for ED.

Your graphic card is almost broken!

Muy bueno. Que tan bueno es el kh-66 para un ataque contra un blindado. Supongo que debe de tener peor resultado que con un kh-25 en el caso del Su-25

The 9M119M have no comparición in accuracy with the Sabot munition. It is a question of tactic. Not all the T-XX will shoot a guided missile in every stage of the battle. Normally the ATGM will be shoot at a distance where the Sabot ammunition have not any chance to hit, while a group of T-XX tanks move forward. In any case. The terrain is really important to get advantage. The Steal Beast simulator is made for the NATO armor operators... So is not really fair for a realistic world wide simulator like DCS

Nice video

Supongo que cuando uno entré al área de los nuevos mapas, en caso que un piloto no tenga el mapa simplemente encontrara el mapa sin texturas y los aeródromos no existirán para los no propietarios de los mapas.

1- Yugoslavia:Mig-21, Mig-29 vs F-15, F-16, F-18 (high level map detail) 2- Israel/Siria: Mig-21, Mig-23, Mig-29 vs F-15, F-16, Mirage (medium level map detail) 3- Persian Gulf: Mig-21, Mig-23, Mig-25, Mig-29, Mirage vs F-14, F-4, F-5 (Low level map detail)

USA fictional and not a Vietnam skin. No way with this skin list!

No puedo creer que los de saitek no se hayan dado cuenta de estos errores. Esperemos que todo quede en una actualización de driver.

My god... Is a non end...

About the ED video. Su-27SM is down, Mig-15... Nobody talk about, Mi-24 the same situation of Mig-15...

This problem is only for the argentinen. Win8 is different version in Argentina?

Thank u. Don't understand why the plans are revised... Before was not a campaign planed?

Sorry but the hellfire missile can't be shoot in very low altitude and is not faster than the ka-50 missiles. The ka-50 have not the technology of the apache. BUT... a good pilot with a Ka-50 can do more than an Apache. The gun of the ka-50 is clear more powerful than the Apache one.

Ok. Please try use the missiles. I think the poor accuracy and performance is about the missiles. With the 30mm gun is much better.

Some month ago the A-10C pilots complaint about the Tunguska hit the Maverick and was so hard kill this SAM. One patch after the Tunguska is completely out of performance with the missiles.

Was already fixed in FC2. Suddenly this bug is back since the first day of FC3 release. Not solved yet...

+1 Tor should have the capability of two target tracking. Also the Tunguska is really weak with the current missile, I think this one have a laser proximity fuse, but look really weak, I only get around 20 % hit with this missile. Don't believe such result in the RL.

This kind of implementation shoul wait till the SIM have the F-18 like flyable module. Right now have no sense this implementation. Even the F-18 been available, ED shoul wait some months to add this tactic for CA players. But, YES... All that kind of things shoul be in our SIM someday

Es que con cabinata 3D y AFM para todos los ruskis como que no me bajó de ninguno.... Ni para probar el F-18 jeje. Ya me imagino a la Peña montandose las mismas historias que hasta ahora con el Su-25T. Que no es real... Que no es simulación... No lo pongáis en las misiones porque es un fraude... Los rusos son la reostia haciendo aviones.

Well not for control Black Sea but they can use it for transport example Novorosik-Sevastopol. Military proyect for missile could be a serious threat with the new missile generation, this time not only 6 missiles. This monster may carry much more modern Russian missiles