Eagle7907

Quick question, I noticed that some of these waypoints are not selectable to be used for navigation. Like the hostile area, defend point, etc. You can’t have jester point you to that point. Is this correct, or am I doing something wrong? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Solved So after upgrading to Win 10, my Ram cap was indeed removed. The 16GB usable was removed. Now I assume I need to check all programs including DCS, to see if I need to reinstall an compatible version. :doh:

Yeah I checked that, MB limit is 32GB. I guess I’ll go ahead and upgrade to Win 10. Support is ending for Win 7 anyways. :/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Okay. So it sounds like I’m right. If you own windows 7 HE 64 bit, you are limited to DCS using only the 16GB allocated for windows? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hey guys, On a whim, I decided to go ahead and plunge into the big 32GB world. I'm not much in understanding the architecture of Windows 7, but noticed after installing that my OS is capped to 16GB. Will that affect how much DCS can utilize? I'm guessing yes? If that's the case, should I upgrade to windows 10? I know lots about how to fly jets but just an amateur computer builder. Tanks!

Yeah, that was sort of the idea of this mission. I included some no-fly areas and the idea of hostile using a mosque for tactical reasons, dispersing weapons at night, etc. Something commonly seen in previous combat videos. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Is it a safe bet the AG radar will not be available when released? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

LOL Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Nope, I understood that as well. I thought I had to write the whole file. Super simple. Just carefully read the directions. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Did he mention anything about 3rd party folks making their changes to 2.5.5 yet? If so, that’s good progress. All that’s left is QA testing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That’s what I was getting at earlier. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

ENGINE SOUNDS KINDA DISAPPOINTING Kaboom!!!! What a turn around. This thread went from “hey this is incorrect” to “what the heck” to “never mind I can fix it” to “we got this”. I like it! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Excellent. That boosts my confidence. Thanks again! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You mean TWS, I’m sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Ah okay. I’m not a very good coder. But as long as I create a backup, I should be okay. Correct? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Solution Thank you Tippis, much appreciated. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Temporary Solution It appears that did make the the 65F impact and destroy the building. I didn’t change anything with the exception of adding a hidden vehicle inside the building itself. Now this is a building like a house. Not sure if that would work with a building with a flat top. The vehicle may just sit on top. Thanks for the idea. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Spotting Oh I wasn’t aware. Where would I make such changes to the distance? Is it something simple to do? Can you direct me to that information? I would like to change it to around 10 miles. I usually can’t spot traffic while flying until about 10 miles anyways. 15 is pretty difficult to do, unless there is a major contrast. Like if there is nothing but a big white cloud behind it. The problem is I have a high res monitor and well, you know. Without labels, dogfights are about a 5% success. My point on the labels cheating argument. I don’t think that completely holds water. I still lose sight of the opponent sometimes with labels on. It all depends on how big the label is and other variables. Anyways, I play SP. MP is too choppy for my system and ISP. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hmmmm. Okay. Thanks for the response guys. Like I said, geniuses. So how would I solve this problem in this mission? Somehow change the lighting? Am I understanding this right? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I don’t think so. I remember Wags saying that once the HARM modes were complete it would be full steam ahead with ATFLIR. I believe the only modes left are prebriefed and just bug fixing. But this has been discussed before, plans change. Always subject to change, and who knows it may be better for everyone’s benefit. They may have hit a snag, so instead the strategy had to change to continue the momentum of releasing features. I’m, so far, happy with their work and the progress they have made. I don’t completely agree with the EA purchasing, but I don’t run the business, someone else does and I leave it at that. Keep going ED! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I most certainly agree. I think the lack of a dimension in digital communication has probably caused more grief than what most realize. Every time I see a locked thread, I question how much or how often was a message misunderstood in that thread. ‘‘Tis a shame, but we must continue to do better. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Great. Anyways, FWIW, I don’t play MP. So I don’t intend to ruin anyone else’s experience. Just saying there are areas to improve or at least add the option to improve to make it less of one person having a significant advantage over another person or bot, to level the playing field. Technology changes, so DCS should adapt to those changes. Nuke away nine. Kaboom. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I agree. What bothers me about the recent delay is now we have 3rd party developers delaying other 3rd party developers patches. Therefore, those who own those products are now being affected. It’s a slippery slope for ED. I sympathize, it’s certainly not an easy business. I don’t know, come to think of it, this probably isn’t the first time this has happened. Anyways, that’s my 2 cents. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I hope it’s not the 3rd party I think it is. I know I shouldn’t be profiling, but if the shoe fits.... .....also, if that’s the case, we may be waiting a while. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hey geniuses. How would you target a building or structure with the 65F? Not sure what I’m doing wrong. -master arm to ARM -select A/G -select MAV -I allow the missile to align. -make sure left DDI is selected by using sensor select LEFT - After aligned, Uncage missile, slew crosshairs to target - once locked, fire weapon Problem is I can’t get the missile seeker to lock on to a building. The target is an actual unit. Not a static object. So I’m completely lost. Also, I tried using the 65E and a JTAC lase the building. That didn’t work either. The laser was no where near the target even though I assigned JTAC to target this unit. ???? The unit has line of sight and no red showing in the ME once assigned. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro