Eagle7907

ED must be working on this now or have changed something. Before the update there was only 6 items that were not clearing. Now we have the whole aircraft saying ‘No go’ or ‘not ready’. I asked about this a month earlier and the response was “it will be fixed later”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

3/13 updates including F14 launch and OB fixes? Oh please tell me the uncommanded roll bug is fixed. I would rather have that fixed before anything else. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I agree with the sentiments here. I can understand previously when we didn’t have datalink. But shouldn’t the flight be able to see who’s targeting what with the radar? If so, then they should be able to accept such a command to engage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That will probably change again with implementation of the data cartridge. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Early Access. Things can/will change with development. YouTube videos don’t. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It is. Lots of those missions were made in the earlier stages, too. So the starting state of those mission will have items turned off which would cause the BIT advisory. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It will clear the advisory if you stop it. But it will trigger again if it detects another failure or fault. For the list of other items on the BIT page that’s WIP. The reason why it shows in instant action is because something might be powered off like the HMD or RWR or countermeasures. As of now it works for the most part correct. What doesn’t work is the ability to clear the BIT list of degrades and no gos. Those systems are not 100% done. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Ah! I was wondering about this. Thanks for the posts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Also when you shoot all your HARMs. Turn off countermeasures, HMD, RWR. It’s all WIP. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

A built in test for a system has failed or no longer working. It’s prompting you to check the BIT page to see what it is. Early access. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Tarawa shortcomings I agree, the Stennis taxi procedures don’t really work well. I think they should reserve an elevator for AI arrivals and despawn once lowered below. That way the mission creators can keep the deck space for players/static if wanted and the AI are predictable and get out of the way quick. As far as the spawning goes, the only solution I can think of is a timer or metering method that keeps the vital deck areas clear and allows an efficient operation for launch and recovery like they currently do. Otherwise, the problem is going from an operation that has clear cut, long, spacious taxiways/movement areas to some very limited square feet of flat surface. Tarawa just compounds the problem because it’s much smaller. However, still utilizing a lift to despawn on is still a good tactic. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Ah okay. Thanks Nealius. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Isn’t the 60 degree nozzle setting correct as implemented? I thought the Marine documentation states 60 degrees a lot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

No sweat. Glad I could help. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

I, like many others, appreciate your work. But let's be real here. The AI Harriers presently have no VTOL capability on the Tarawa. If they do, then mine is broken. I've never seen them fully land, then taxi to shutdown. They just disappear or crash. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

It doesn't reck my OB install. Though I only play SP. I don't know if MP will be a problem. Darn, I see it failed.

Thank you, just like I said.

I can’t remember what it’s called or if it’s still there, but when Harrier released I remember seeing a TDC (no action) button. I played with that and noticed if you press that and TDC slew, the rates are doubled. I don’t know if it’s still there. May try that? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Anti-skid proper behaviour? That’s odd. So then answer his question. Where is the flight idle position and how does he get it? Because Id love to see how that is even possible in the sim. I haven’t seen a difference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

TACAN offset for low visibility landings I would just make a waypoint over the threshold use same magnetic course and use simple 3:1 arithmetic to 3/4 mile final. That will be just as good as RNAV GPS approach. Of course I wouldn’t do that over any mountains or known obstacles. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

EFUZ Inst Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Oh that makes sense. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

That’s strange, i didn’t have it before the update. Oh well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hey y’all. I noticed RAZBAM fixes the pitch caret values. No need in selecting 6 for proper angle now. For whatever reason it wasn’t in the change log. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro