Dagger71

^^^^^^THIS! Many DCS players do not speak english and therefore only join private servers in their respective languages. Whether the server hosts 10 or 100 people is irrelevant as that is how the server members want it to be. The server DanielNL is complaining about is a russian squadron private server. They have no obligation to advertise their server in english forums, as (I am assuming) they are only using russian as the only language used on the server. They also had the highest connected players in all of DCS, so obviously they don't need to advertise on english forums!!!

And that won't happen. Daniel there could be 1000 reasons why they hide any info. A server might be setup for active service personnel across various overseas theaters and don't want to disclose that. Could be a test server for a specific MP beta testing team. Could be a private elite server that is only open to members of Skulls and Bones and requires a $100 000 entry fee. Could be a private server for manga lovers. It doesn't matter who the server members are, ED will never force them to disclose this information. A private server cannot be forced to accept anyone nor are they obligated to disclose anything about the server nor of the members. We've been through this before.

Looks like you have 2 mods installed F4E and Mig23UB.

it's obviously a private server since it's password protected. They don't need to provide a link, if they do not want to disclose it. Again ED hs no intentions of forcing private servers to do anything like change their name (unless it violates the terms of service). Besides there is in fact a place to post a link to the server info IF the admins wish to publish it. The title of this thread should be "ED please force servers to disclose all information about the server in the MP browser lobby". You are fighting a losing battle on this one and in fact you are exposing yourself to getting getting blacklisted by members of that server (or others) if you continue. Just my opinion. I'd leave it at if I were you.

Except it was never made public, so I am assuming it's a private event that did not publish the details to anyone except their own members. ED has no business (nor would they ever) in forcing them to disclose anything.

Again forcing privately funded server owners to do anything (like forcing to have an actual website or forum post) is not going to work. I understand that seeing a server full of people and not knowing anything about it can be frustrating, but this might be by design. A private squad might not want this to be public and in fact Firmament Fighters Event is a password protected server! This could be an event by invite only with members agreeing not to disclose anything about it. It doesn't really matter what they are doing, ED can't force them to disclose anything about their privately funded server. If you ask (NOT demand!) nicely on the forums, it's possible you MIGHT get answers from the server/squad in question. But since you came on here demanding ED to force them to disclose information about the server, is NOT going to win you any approval from the server admins. In fact they will see you as hostile and probably never allow you to join.

I think you misunderstood. Current environment temperature = outside temperature. ISA is a model set of temperatures and barometric pressures at various altitudes. @0 feet ISA is 15degrees Celsius with 29.92 in. (1,013.25 mb)

Ok Sorry, I was mistaken, Daniel only got officially banned from two not threeservers! But to be honest I do talk to DanielNL outside the forums.If he ever has questions or just want to talk he can!

Mr Biggs, I'm not sure why you are here complaining about an issue that has nothing to do with the OP. The OP is asking to have ED force private servers to allow connections from banned players while you are complaining about ED's forum policies. ED forums are owned by ED while servers are owned/leased/rented by private individuals. As for Daniel, IF ED or any private game developer ever tried to enforce private servers to allow banned players, they would actually open themselves to legal action in almost every jurisdiction on earth. If I own a server and ban you, there is NOTHING any company or government can do to force me to accept your connection to my network. It is my network, my hardware and my bandwidth. You've been banned from 3 servers to date, (as far as your previous posts have shown, possibly more!) so it's time you look at your own actions and stop trying to put the blame on others.

Servers are rented/bought by various groups and individuals and NOT by ED, therefore ED has no business nor any rights to unban anyone on a private server. It is the right of any private server to ban anyone for any reason they see fit. If you find yourself getting banned from multiple servers, then you need to reflect on your own actions that led to the ban.

I don't hear anything wrong.

What are you even trying to show here? You are basically moving your head back ad forth quickly.

Daniel ALL SAMs in DCS self destruct when the target is out of range (altitude or distance). This is not a TOR issue. Also what you did was hijack this thread, which is against forum rules 1.14.

Ok I am going to bow out of this conversation because it is clearly becoming nonsensical. There is nothing magical about IFF transmissions. I never made this statement. They are however NOT RF frequencies that any current RWR are designed to pick up. If I tune my radio to 104 MHz, it will NOT be able to pick up any other frequency. My radio cannot pickup anything other that frequencies on the AM and FM frequency bands. There really is nothing left to say on this topic. It's been answered several times.

RWRs are not classified BUT to talk about specifics can potentially be. And who are you waiting for????? I seriously doubt a former military "RWR engineer" is going to be allowed to comment here. Just open s new thread in 20 years.

So the answer is no. But I find it absolutely fascinating that the forum on your link posted the exact same question just two days before you posted this. We can close this thread.

Well if you don't understand it, I'll leave it at that. Do you have anything relevant to add to the discussion?

Please put the entire statement in context. "Fighter/attack jets do not monitor freqs to monitor radio emission from hostiles. That falls under Electronic warfare. "

Again NOTHING to do with IFF interrogation. To quote the article: "modern RWR systems (such as ALR-94 , ASQ-239 , Spectra) are capable of classifying the source of the radar by the signal’s strength, phase and waveform type, and even capable of pinpointing the exact location of a ground threat. " So I will ask you again for proof that any RWR picks up IFF interrogation. Not hypotheticals, not theoreticals, not guesses,PROOF.

Does this graphic glitch occur when you place the EWR off the actually runway?

I've already said I am sure there are some EW aircraft that do pickup all sorts of RF signals,possibly even IFF interogations from non nato planes. The question was do NATO RWR pick up and triangulate these signals. answer is no.

You should never plug or unplug a USB controller regardless of the game engine while the game is loaded and running. Always do it prior to loading while in an options menu. Hotplugging USB controllers is not really supported by any sim/game that I know of. Even if some do allow it without causing issues, you just should not do it.

Seems like no one actually answered the question. In game the Roland is the blue side "equivalent" to the red side TOR but is less effective. For some reason in DCS most Red SAMs are far superior to the blue equivalent (for all short, medium and long range SAMs).