emg

In this case, the EFM may be done before the cockpit coding. CptSmiley has been working on the M2k for a good while.

Yep. The point was just to show, the F-104G (and F-5E) are not the only frontline fighters without BVR missiles in a 1980 scenario. Israeli F-16As went into frontline air-to-air combat in 1982 without a BVR missile - this maybe tells us that BVR misiles were not a necessity for small fighters in 80's air combat. Btw MiG-21 with WVR IR-missiles and guns only; still got many victories against F-4 and Mirage: http://www.acig.info/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=185&Itemid=47

Nice :thumbup:

CaptSmiley (who started the F-16 AFM crowd project) is their EFM programmer, I don't think there will be an SFM release.

Yes but make sure youcreate the correct file structure within the mod folder. It's pretty well explained in the guide.

AMRAAM beta version was first used on F-15 in 90/91. F-16A had no BVR missile. (Remarkably!) F-16C had AIM-7. http://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament_article10.html

Note the F-16A (1979) did not use AIM-7, yet was the main air defence fighter for many nations, and frontline fighter for many US squadrons.

The first 3rd party dev to make a twin engine, multicrew fighter/bomber (or just bomber) will make a lot of sales.

SLI/crossfire breaks the basic rules of math.

From M2M:

:lol: And I'm glad the internet is moving away from the Untergang meme videos, was getting a bit old in the tooth. Edit: actually, scratch that...

Thanks for the info. Yefim, I am disappoint ;(.

MiG-21PFM had them from '68, unsure if specifically the Bis used them. https://books.google.no/books?id=6s_vBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT116&lpg=PT116&dq=mig-21+kh-66&source=bl&ots=IIvRkjhHr8&sig=KwyPJ8NXyDVTYF1Z-ZGAFJXH54Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Zz3SVKPYHoTgyQOjloBg&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=mig-21%20kh-66&f=false

Thanks for the update :thumbup:

It's strange that you get half FPS in C-101 vis-a-vis MiG-21. Were you using the interior lights? Btw you can upgrade that GTX 275 pretty cheaply now, for instance a GTX 750ti can be had for like 130 USD. Gtx 275 compared to GTX 480 (big difference) http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2010-gaming-graphics-charts-high-quality/compare,2463.html?prod%5B4504%5D=on&prod%5B4524%5D=on And GTX 480 compared to GTX 750 Ti (750ti around 90-100% performance of GTX 480) http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1130?vs=1135

You can say the same about this wing config with extended slats and flaps :)

When sideslipping, the FM is modeling variable drag from your "sideways AoA." So, along with the variable lift and drag from the 109 flaps, variable wing geometry shouldn't be an "alien thing" in DCS.

How is this different from modeling flaps on the 109?

All have been used successfully by land-based units. ;) And the vast majority of F-14 kills were done by land-based Iranian units .

Yep, different than FL. The Rafale HUD does emphasize FL instead, see here: (3550) http://i.imgur.com/J1gMvHS.jpg

Nice interview with Cobra: http://dcs-uvp.cz/index.php/en/forum/news-articles/707-interview-with-nicholas-cobra847-dackard#5861

In Santander :megalol: https://twitter.com/aeropuertoSDR/status/562008786739548161

https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims Detail in the images is affected by image compression (look at the garbled labels) but it's nice to see a working HUD. Always liked the French HUD symbology where they emphasize the angels. (1264)

F-104 saw combat in 65 and 74 against the MiG-21, both planes reached initial service around 1959. IMO, it fits fine.

Get hyped ;)