Jump to content

Big Nuts

Members
  • Posts

    180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Big Nuts

  1. Really illuminating! This stuff will be quite advanced in the present day i imagine, although what's to stop someone simulating it if data is not forthcoming? This is in reference to the RWR and related electromagnetic jiggery-pokery.
  2. Sustained turn rate would be the most important one no? It implies performance. High sustained alpha? Means it doesn't stall easily? I heard the designer of the F15/F16 say the F35 was a turkey, what's peoples opinion of his opinion?
  3. There used to be a game in 4 colour CGA, it used pyramids for mountains and the terrain was a solid lump of purple. It ran on a pc with a 25mhz cpu, 512k ram and 2mb hdd. It had a campaign where you could plan attacks against any target to outcome the campaign. OCA the airfields and deny them air power, then get the tanks? As a virtual F16 pilot you waged a war with your squadrons, and you quickly developed your own tactics. I would hit the fuel depots after a time and watch as the enemy war machine ground to a halt. There is nothing like a mission that actually makes a difference to the war. In the words of Brian Cox, it was 'Amazin'.
  4. Yeah ATC really is fun, another layer of being a pilot. Let's use that big word 'Immersion' :) Here's my cheesey sell point to ED, but improvements to the core game, improve every module at the same time, i think it would be a major addition to the Sim/Game(?) Ever hopefull B Nuts.
  5. Love the MiG15bis ~S~
  6. Any chance we can see work in the following areas? AWACS/EWR ..........Get rid of ghost contacts and more 'operators' to stop the long delay. ATC ..........Fully simulated ATC AI ..........Mo better. Improved Radio comms. ..........Asking status/ fuel state / weapon state / raygun etc.. .
  7. Just chiming in, yeah the MiG21-93 would be amazing. Imagine an upgraded MiG21, Helmet sights R73/aim9x, IRST, F16 radar, Amraam/R77/R27E, more thrust, god it would be mental.
  8. Yeah it's like there's only one guy doing all the comms. Can we recruit some more please ?
  9. Yeah good old Parachute, you land fast then go straight into a wall of jelly. So cool.
  10. Shallow and fast with the 21, and cushion the sink rate with a burst of power. Don't try and be a flare master with it, just get it down within limits and use the throttle to take the sharp edges out of it.
  11. They'd be busy making the terrorists. eheh
  12. The English Harrier coz the Harrier is English, and why not a Sea Harrier? I'd jump at that.
  13. Big Nuts

    Radar IFF

    Yeah a working AWACS and Ground control would be nice, not to mention atc that regulates it's zone of control. I would have thought these were important, but they've been this way since forever.:joystick:
  14. Weather is and winds are a big and ever present factor in flying, it's a shame DCS doesn't convey this to it's players much. Players who don't fly Irl are missing out on a whole load of fun.
  15. That would be great, also could we have our multiplayer flight time added to our logbook?
  16. Global Illumination, that would be my wish. :pilotfly:
  17. The F16 would be very popular! All i can say about the F18 is EffShmeighteen, MiGs dance circles around it. F16 is the biz. I heard mention of BMS, respect :bow: P.S. can i chng my effn username??? Thx.
  18. Been looking last few days, tried 3/4 missions and there's nothing for CA users. :cry:
  19. Just want to chime in here saying i just bought CA and think it's great, look forward to seeing it evolve.
  20. How about GDI (is that the right acronym?) for the MiG21? EWR stations share the same problems with AWACS? How about scripted Awacs/GDI delivering text to the player? Also how about more fleshed out CA stuff in your missions? A few more SAM systems that players can take to a tactical position and await the enemy? Thx. P.S. The Op Leopard mission is giving a few people problems with stutters, is it just more intensive on RAM than the others? :bow:
  21. So the Nevada theater has come from the work of the Fighter Ops team???!
  22. Not even possible! This is computer land were talking about here, they can do anything at all, the infantry have skeletal animation, and follow commands. The carrier tends to be the focus when at sea, allowing for high levels of detail without rendering huge amounts of terrain. Many leagues from impossible. They have the hard stuff done already it seems.
  23. I get flamouts at around Mach2+(42k feet) Is there any way to avoid this, is it just not able to go beyond mach 2, even though it has the thrust ?
  24. Hi, can i please change my user name? .... :helpsmilie:
  25. Mine does this, it was fine at first in sp... But in mp it was like that. Then after a few days it started appearing like this during my sp as well. By the way i run the game with only 4gb of memory so i know that's not upto snuff.
×
×
  • Create New...