mytai01

My personal experience is that I was in a Piper under a not very significant cloud layer that rolled our plane even though the pilot was using full opposite aileron. We came out of it quickly enough, but it was the first time I experienced that in a small plane. We were at least 500 ft under the cloud when it happened and it was just a layer of not more than 2,000 feet think on a normal sunny day.

There needs to be turbulence near and in clouds. That is just a reality in flying.

Anapa Surge Launch Obeying ATC Runway Separation Rules Below is the latest Anapa Surge Lauch file which obeys all of the ATC runway separation rules Su-33 Training.miz

I regret ever mentioning it...

Open Ocean I want to see a map of open ocean...;)

This is exactly why Air Traffic Controllers exist!!! Checkout my Anapa Surge Launch mission posted by the same name. It has all the same problems your mission has but I've since "air traffic controlled" the situation to make the airplanes obey all air traffic rules of separation. I'll post that file later today.

It makes sense when you consider that it's too hard for a pilot to fly with one degree of accuracy. Most radar vectors issued by ATC to pilots are to the nearest 10 degrees, and only sometimes to the nearest 5 degrees except for PAR approaches which are a little finer.

I'm waiting for the DCS: Wright Flyer. With a full fidelity clickable...er...cockpit? DCS: Paper airplane?

Personal Preference is not a bug. In the words of a mighty hero, "You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred!"

No going to happen.

ATC needs to be a true module.

I'm talking about ATC issuing wind information. The picture below is an example of what equipment that American ATC uses to issue wind from. As you can see it shows direction in 10 degree increments.

I want a Star Destroyer with the complete compliment of invasion equipment (AT-AT;AT-ST; etc) and Stormtroopers.

Could we have an option to receive Wind information the way it's given in the United States? Here the wind direction is given in whole 10 degree increments and the speed is in knots. And it's spoken by ATC as: example: "Wind, Two Seven Zero at One Zero" with gusts: "Wind, Two Seven Zero at One Zero, Gust Two Zero" variable wind with gusts: "Wind Two Seven Zero variable Three Six Zero at One Zero, Gust Three Two" We never say it in smaller units.

None of this answers the original question, real or not?

Is this a real module, or just a joke?

Don't forget, this is an alpha release. It hasn't even reached beta yet. There is a huge amount of potential changes that could happen before it reaches full release version.

I recently noticed that aircraft in the NTTR map seem easier to see further away using VR. Has something been changed?

Law suits are pending...:doh:

Why are all the frequencies in DCS not the real life frequencies?

The CAP is just a waiting spot. You want to point your radar at the likely direction of approach, so that is how you orient your race track pattern. AWACS should give you any contacts that are approaching you long before they are a threat.

What Canadianbaken said has been true for some years now, but it depends on the era of combat aviation you're referring too. Today, In the West, the Air Operations Center [AOC, usually a Joint AOC (JAOC) or Combined AOC (CAOC)] plans out the whole activity in the Area of Operations (AO) on a 72 hour cycle called the Air Tasking Cycle (or Wheel of Death). Everyday a new cycle starts, so there are 3 cycles at various stages of planning and execution each day. The final product they produce is the Air Tasking Order (ATO). In real life, you are never alone in the air. Everything is planned, including your CAP direction of orbit altitude and controlling authority (most likely an AWACS, or ground CRC). Control in the real world is very tight unlike DCS where it's a freaking free for all like atmosphere...

What do you want to see?